Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Workshops and Meetings
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer option
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Biology Open
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Biology Open

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Workshops and Meetings
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer option
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Fine-tuning the onset of myogenesis by homeobox proteins that interact with the Myf5 limb enhancer
Philippe Daubas, Nathalie Duval, Lola Bajard, Francina Langa Vives, Benoît Robert, Baljinder S. Mankoo, Margaret Buckingham
Biology Open 2015 4: 1614-1624; doi: 10.1242/bio.014068
Philippe Daubas
CNRS URA 2578, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathalie Duval
CNRS URA 2578, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lola Bajard
CNRS URA 2578, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francina Langa Vives
Centre d'Ingénierie génétique murine, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benoît Robert
CNRS URA 2578, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baljinder S. Mankoo
King's College London, Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, New Hunt's House, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret Buckingham
CNRS URA 2578, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris 75015, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    EMSA experiments showing that the 145-bp Myf5 element contains HBox sites to which Meox2 and Msx1/2 proteins bind in vitro. (A) The DNA sequence of the 145-bp Myf5 enhancer. HBox1-3 binding sites are in red. Blue letters above the sequence show nucleotide changes in mutated oligos used in EMSA. HBox1-3 DNA probes used in gel shifts are indicated by solid lines under the sequence. Pax3 (black) and Six1/4 (green) binding sites (Bajard et al., 2006; Giordani et al., 2007) are indicated in bold. (B) EMSA experiments were performed using 3 different DNA probes containing putative HBox1, 2 or 3 binding sites. In vitro synthesized Meox2 protein was added to the probes (lanes 1-2) and polyclonal anti-Meox2 antibodies were subsequently added (lanes 2). Each probe binds Meox2 protein and the complex is supershifted when antibodies are added (asterisks). Competition with unlabelled probe is shown for HBox2 (lanes 3, 4). A 200 molar excess of unlabelled probe competes the binding (lane 3), whereas unlabelled probe with a mutated binding site does not compete (lane 4). A control with crude reticulocyte lysate is shown in lane C. (C) Example of an EMSA experiment showing that Msx1 and 2 proteins can bind to the HBox2 probe. Binding occurs when Msx1-Cterm-HA (Msx1-HA) or Msx2-Cterm-Flag (Msx2-F) proteins are present (lanes 2 and 4) and specificity is demonstrated by the reduction of the shifted bands when antibodies, anti-HA (lane 3) or anti-Flag (lane 5), are added. Controls are shown with crude reticulocyte lysate (lane C) or with Pax3 protein as a positive control (lane 1).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    EMSA experiments with combinations of proteins to test co-binding or competition on the HBox2 probe. The labelled HBox2 probe, which contains Pax3 and Six binding sites was used in limiting molar amounts, compared to the proteins added. (A) Pax3 and Six4 proteins can bind together to the same DNA sequence. Pax3 binding (lane 1) is supershifted with anti-Pax3 antibodies (lane 2, asterisk). Six4 binding (lane 3) is supershifted when anti-Six4 antibodies are present (lane 4, asterisk). When both proteins are present, an additional slower migrating band is detected (lane 5, arrow) and the intensity of the band corresponding to Six4 binding alone is reduced, compared to lane 3. When anti-Pax3 (lane 6) or anti-Six4 (lane7) antibodies are added, this band, which is therefore due to co-binding of Pax3 and Six4 on the same oligo, is disrupted and the bands due to Pax3 or Six4 binding alone are supershifted. Similar results were obtained with Pax3 and Six1, with disruption of the Pax3/Six1 complex with anti-Pax3 antibodies (results not shown). Lane C is the control with crude lysate. (B) Meox2 and Six1/4 co-binding is not detectable. EMSA was performed with constant amounts of Meox2 and increasing amounts of either Six1 (left side of panel) or Six4 (right side of panel). Presence of anti-Meox2 (lanes 5) or anti-Six1 (left, lanes 6,8) or Six4 (right, lanes 6,8) antibodies are indicated above the panel. No additional slower migrating band, suggesting co-binding of Meox2 and Six proteins, is detected. A weak band (indicated by an arrow) was detected in most samples, including the control with crude lysate (lane C). Asterisks indicate the position of bands supershifted by antibodies. (C) Meox2 and Pax3 co-binding is not detectable. In the presence of constant amounts of Meox2 (left side of panel), no Pax3 (lane 1) or increasing amounts of Pax3 were added (lanes 2-4). No supplementary band is detected when both proteins are present. Controls are shown with Pax3 alone (lane 7) or with Pax3 and anti-Pax3 antibody (lane 8) or lysate alone (C). In the presence of constant amounts of Pax3 (right side of panel), no Meox2 (lane 1) or increasing amounts of Meox2 were added (lanes 2-4). No additional slower migrating band is detected when both proteins are present in the binding reaction. A weak band (arrow) was detected in most samples, including those without Meox2 and appears to represent a Pax3 complex with this lysate. Addition of anti-Meox2 (lanes 5, 8) or anti-Pax3 (lane 6) antibodies disrupt the bandshifts and, in the case of Pax3, generate a supershift (asterisk). Controls are shown with Meox2 alone (lane 7) or with Meox2 and anti-Meox2 antibody (lane 8). (D) Msx1 and Six4 co-binding is not detectable. Increasing amounts of Msx1 alone (lanes 1-3) or with constant amounts of Six4 added at the same time (lanes 4-6) do not produce an additional slower migrating band when both proteins are present. Six4 binding is reduced when higher amounts of Msx1 are added (lanes 4-6). This displacement occurs even if Six4 protein is added before Msx1 (lanes 7-9). (E) Msx1 binding is displaced by increasing amounts of Pax3. When constant amounts of Msx1 without (lane 1) or with 2.5, 5, or 10 fold amounts of Pax3 (lanes 1-4) are added, reduction of Msx1 binding is seen as Pax3 levels increase, under gel conditions which facilitate distinction of Pax3 and Msx1 binding with lower levels of Pax3. This is confirmed by the histogram showing a scan of this autoradiograph with ImageJ 1.47v. (F) Msx1 and Pax3 can bind together when the spacing between the sites is increased. One copy of a mutated HBox2* site, which does not bind Msx1 (see Fig. 4), was intercalated on either side of the bona fide HBox2 site, thus increasing the distance between Pax3 and Six binding sites. In the presence of constant amounts of Msx1 (lanes 2-6) and increasing amounts of Pax3 (lanes 3-5), a supplementary slower migrating complex appears (arrow). When anti-Pax3 antibody is added, this band disappears and Pax3 complexes are supershifted (asterisk, lane 6). This band does not appear if Pax3 is added alone (lane 7) but is detected when Pax3 and Msx1-HA proteins are added together or sequentially (lane 8) and disappears if anti-HA antibodies are added (lane 9). Note that bands corresponding to Pax3 or Msx1-HA complexes alone migrate at almost the same positions as shown in Fig. 1 (G) The drawing resumes the competition between homeoproteins such as Msx1 and Meox2 and Pax3/Six proteins for in vitro binding to the oligonucleotide probe in the EMSA experiments presented. The binding of a homeoprotein at the HBox2 site (red) prevents the binding of Pax3 or Six1/4.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Msx1 and Meox2 proteins interact in vivo with the 145-bp Myf5 regulatory sequence. ChIP experiments were carried out with two different anti-HA antibodies (aHA1-2), to immunoprecipitate chromatin prepared from the thoracic region of the trunk including forelimb buds (forelimb region), of E10-E10.5 Msx1Tag/Tag embryos, or with anti-Meox2 antibodies to immunoprecipitate chromatin prepared from the equivalent region of wild-type embryos at E10.5. Histograms represent the fold change in occupancy of the 145-bp Myf5 element, versus two different negative control regions located respectively at −257.5 kb (black) and −55.2 kb (grey) upstream of the Myf5 gene transcription start site (Bajard et al., 2006; Giordani et al., 2007). A control using IgGs from non-immune serum is shown for experiments with wild-type chromatin. Results on the right part of the figure were obtained with ChIP on extracts from interlimb regions, excluding limb buds, of Msx1Tag/Tag embryos at E10.5, using anti-HA antibodies or control non immune IgGs. Biological replicates of these ChIP experiments were carried out with three different preparations of chromatin. Error bars indicate s.e.m.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Mutation of HBox2, without affecting Pax3 and Six1/4 binding, results in premature activation of the −58/−57 kb Myf5 limb enhancer. (A). Single mutation scanning in the HBox2 binding site (red) region by successive replacements of nucleotides by a cytosine (C) (Mut1 to 6). Pax3 and Six1/4 binding sites are shown as shadowed boxes. (B) EMSA experiments were performed with the wild-type (WT) sequence or the mutated probe corresponding to Mut6 in order to test the binding of Pax3, Six1/4, Msx1 and Meox2 in vitro synthesized proteins. Compared with the wild-type sequence (WT), mutation 6 (Mut6-HBox2*) does not affect the binding of Pax3 (lanes 2), Six 1 (lanes 3) and Six4 (lanes 4), but compromises the binding of Msx1 (lanes 5) and Meox2 (lanes 6) (arrows). Controls with crude lysate are shown in lanes 1. (C-L) Examples of X-gal stained transient transgenic embryos at E10.5 (35/36 somites), obtained with a −58/−57baMyf5nLacZ transgene in which the 145-bp sequence within the −58/−57 region contains a mutated HBox2* sequence (C-G) or a wild-type HBox2 (H-L). Whole mount X-Gal stained embryos are shown in C and H, with close-ups of the forelimb region in D and I, where the arrow points to X-gal staining. FL, forelimb bud, asterisk shows branchial arch expression – this and variable neural tube expression are due to sequences in the Myf5 proximal promoter region used (baMyf5). (E-G,J-L) Serial cryostat sections at the forelimb level where the plane of section is shown by a line in C for E,F, and in H for J,K. Sections including the hypaxial somite and proximal forelimb are shown in G and L. These X-Gal stained sections (Myf5-β-Gal) were treated with anti-Pax3 antibodies, revealed by horse radish peroxidase (PAX3-HRP) to label Pax3-positive myogenic progenitors (HDM, hypaxial dermomyotome).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Msx1 Cre-mediated inactivation in Pax3-positive cells leads to premature expression of Myf5 in the hypaxial somite. (A) Immunochemistry on transverse cryosections at forelimb level of Pax3Cre/+;Msx1fl/+;Msx2fl/+(control, left), Pax3Cre/+;Msx1fl/fl;Msx2fl/+ (M1, middle) and Pax3Cre/+;Msx1fl/fl;Msx2fl/fl (M1M2, right) embryos at E9.75 (28-30 somites), showing merged images after immunostaining with anti-Pax3 (green) and anti-Myf5 antibodies (red). Contrary to control embryos, double positive Myf5+/Pax3+ cells are found in the region of the hypaxial dermomyotome (HDM), indicated by white arrows in the higher magnification shown for the M1M2 embryo. White lines in merged images represent the upper limit (corresponding to the ventral part of the neighbouring neural tube) below which Myf5+ cells in the Pax3+ population were counted. The contour of the embryos is marked by a white line. FL, forelimb; DM, dermomyotome; M, myotome. (B) Histogram representing the percentage of Myf5+ cells among the Pax3+ cells counted in cryosections equivalent to those shown in (A), with 870-960 Pax3+ cells counted from three embryos for each genotype. Error bars indicate s.e.m. 0.01<*P<0.05; 0.001<**P<0.01; versus control. (C) Comparison of wild-type Msx1+/+ and Msx1nLacZ/nLacZ (Msx1−/−) mutant embryos hybridized with an anti-sense Myf5 riboprobe. Whole mount lateral enlarged views at the forelimb level of embryos at E11.5 are shown.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Meox2 inactivation induces a delay in Myf5 expression in forelimb buds, which operates via HBox sequences in the 145-bp Myf5 element. (A-F) Lateral views showing X-Gal staining at 36 (A,D), 37 (B,E) and 39 (C,F) somite stages of Meox2+/−Myf5+/nLacZ (Myf5+/−A-C) or Meox2−/−Myf5+/nLacZ (Myf5+/− D-F) embryos. Activation of the Myf5nLacZ allele in myogenic progenitor cells in the forelimb bud is delayed in the absence of Meox2 (arrows in B,E). (G-L) X-Gal stained Meox2+/− (G-I) and Meox2−/− (J-L) embryos (E10.5) obtained after crossing with a transgenic 145-baMyf5nlacZ line, with magnifications of the dorsal aspect of the forelimbs shown in H,I,K,L. There is a striking reduction in β-galactosidase positive cells in the mutant at this stage (red arrows). (M-O) X-Gal stained transient transgenic embryos at E10.5, with a −58/−57baMyf5nlacZ transgene (−58/−57) (M) or with the same transgene in which HBoxes 1-3 sequences in the 145-bp sequence have been mutated (−58/−57 Mut HBox1/2*/3) (N,O). An enlargement at the forelimb level is shown in O. When all 3 HBox sequences are mutated transgene expression in the forelimb (red arrow) is absent at E10.5. Expression in the branchial arches and neural tube is due to sequences in the proximal promoter region of Myf5 (baMyf5), present in the transgene.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Model for activation of Myf5 transcription via the 145-bp core element, during early forelimb bud development. Binding of Msx1 interferes with binding of Pax3 and Six1/4 to the enhancer, and this prevents premature activation of Myf5 expression in myogenic progenitors in the hypaxial somite. Binding of Pax3 and Six1/4 in conjunction with Meox2 binding to flanking homeobox sites in the enhancer is required for normal activation of Myf5 expression. Maintenance of Myf5 expression in the myoblasts once they have migrated into the limb is dependent on Pax3 and Six1/4 but is independent of Meox2 activity. Abbreviations: DM, dermomyotome; M, myotome; HDM, hypaxial dermomyotome; PMM, pre-muscle masses.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Myf5 transcription
  • Msx1
  • Meox2
  • Mouse embryo
  • Limb myogenesis

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Biology Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fine-tuning the onset of myogenesis by homeobox proteins that interact with the Myf5 limb enhancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Biology Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Biology Open web site.
Share
Research Article
Fine-tuning the onset of myogenesis by homeobox proteins that interact with the Myf5 limb enhancer
Philippe Daubas, Nathalie Duval, Lola Bajard, Francina Langa Vives, Benoît Robert, Baljinder S. Mankoo, Margaret Buckingham
Biology Open 2015 4: 1614-1624; doi: 10.1242/bio.014068
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Fine-tuning the onset of myogenesis by homeobox proteins that interact with the Myf5 limb enhancer
Philippe Daubas, Nathalie Duval, Lola Bajard, Francina Langa Vives, Benoît Robert, Baljinder S. Mankoo, Margaret Buckingham
Biology Open 2015 4: 1614-1624; doi: 10.1242/bio.014068

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article Navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Molecular characterization and overexpression of mnp6 and vp3 from Pleurotus ostreatus revealed their involvement in biodegradation of cotton stalk lignin
  • Edar is a downstream target of beta-catenin and drives collagen accumulation in the mouse prostate
  • The signal peptide plus a cluster of positive charges in prion protein dictate chaperone-mediated Sec61 channel gating
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advertisement

Cover article - Contribution of non-circadian neurons to the temporal organization of locomotor activity

A confocal projection of an expression pattern of a novel neuronal cluster that participates in the control of locomotor activity in Drosophila

Our cover article characterizes the impact of different putative postsynaptic partners of the small ventral lateral neurons on the control of rhythmic locomotor behavior. M. Fernanda Ceriani and team found that some of these novel neuronal clusters are relevant for the control of locomotor activity.


Featured article - Development and validation of RdRp Screen, a crystallization screen for viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases

Light micrographs of some of the crystals obtained with the RdRp screen

Frank Kozielski and colleagues have developed a 96-well crystallization screen for viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRps). Read about this platform for streamlining the crystallisation of RdRps and implementing structure-based drug discovery programs.


First person interviews

First authors Sarah Hoffman, Amani Hassan, Eriko Seo, Yunlong Li and Klytaimnistra Kiouptsi

Have you seen our interviews with the early-career first authors of our papers? Recently, we caught up with first authors Sarah Hoffman, Amani Hassan, Eriko Seo, Yunlong Li and Klytaimnistra Kiouptsi.


Why should you publish your next paper in BiO?

Biology Open has strong credentials and publishing with us is easy and fast. BiO aims to provide rapid publication for scientifically sound observations and valid conclusions in developmental, cell, experimental and translational biology. Submit your paper here; you’ll be in good company.

Part of Fig. 4: Folic acid rescue is MLCK and Src-kinase dependent

Recent disease mechanism highlights in BiO – Timothy Plageman and team investigate folic acid’s modification of epithelial cell shape during morphogenesis, shedding light onto the mechanism by which folic acid may prevent neural tube defects.


Transfer to Biology Open

If your submission to one of our other journals, Development, Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Experimental Biology or Disease Models & Mechanisms, is unsuccessful, did you know you can transfer your paper and any reviews directly to Biology Open? The majority of papers transferred with reviews are accepted for publication. Find out how here.


PreLights - Short-range interactions govern cellular dynamics in microbial multi-genotype systems

Connor Rosen highlights two preprints which show that microbial conversations dictate growth by measuring and modeling the crosstalk between individual microbial cells.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About BiO
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Grants and funding
  • Workshops and Meetings
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer option

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact BiO
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2019   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992