Advertisement
Research Article
Homeotic functions of the Teashirt transcription factor during adult Drosophila development
Wei Wang, Neil Tindell, Shun Yan, John H. Yoder
Biology Open 2013 2: 18-29; doi: 10.1242/bio.20122915

Summary

During Drosophila development region-specific regulation of target genes by Hox proteins is modulated by genetic interactions with various cofactors and genetic collaborators. During embryogenesis one such modulator of Hox target specificity is the zinc-finger transcription factor Teashirt (Tsh) that is expressed in the developing trunk and cooperatively functions with trunk-specific Hox proteins to promote appropriate segment fate. This embryonic function of Tsh is characterized as homeotic since loss of embryonic Tsh activity leads to transformation of trunk segments toward head identity. In addition to this embryonic homeotic role, Tsh also performs vital Hox-independent functions through patterning numerous embryonic, larval and adult structures. Here we address whether the homeotic function of Tsh is maintained throughout development by investigating its contribution to patterning the adult abdomen. We show that Tsh is expressed throughout the developing abdomen and that this expression is dependent on the three Bithorax Hox proteins Ultrabithorax, Abdominal-A and Abdominal-B. Conditional reduction of Tsh activity during pupation reveals broad homeotic roles for this transcription factor throughout the adult abdomen. Additionally we show that, as during embryogenesis, the tsh paralog tiptop (tio) plays a partially redundant role in this homeotic activity.

Introduction

The zinc-finger transcription factor Teashirt (Tsh) has diverse, pleiotropic roles throughout Drosophila development. Initially identified for its homeotic function during embryogenesis (Fasano et al., 1991; Röder et al., 1992), tsh also has many Hox-independent patterning functions. In the embryo Tsh is expressed in the trunk segments (thorax and abdomen) and functions cooperatively with trunk-specific Hox proteins, encoded by a subset of the homeotic complex (HOM-C) genes, to direct fate away from head identity (de Zulueta et al., 1994; Fasano et al., 1991; Röder et al., 1992). In the absence of Tsh activity, thoracic and abdominal segments differentiate sclerotic cuticle indicative of gnathal structures. Furthermore, in common with trunk-specific Hox proteins, ectopic Tsh expression transforms head toward trunk identity (de Zulueta et al., 1994; González-Reyes and Morata, 1990). The collaborative homeotic function of Tsh and trunk-specific Hox proteins is underscored by their parallel contributions to repression of the homeodomain transcription factor Optix, restricting its expression to the labrum, maxillary and labial segments of the head (Coiffier et al., 2008). These observations support the hypothesis that in Drosophila Tsh establishes a trunk ground state and that in combination with trunk Hox proteins promotes segment diversity through regulation of both independent and common transcriptional targets (de Zulueta et al., 1994). Tsh and the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) physically interact in vitro and both contribute to repression of the target gene modulo in the prothorax (Taghli-Lamallem et al., 2007). Combined these observations support the hypothesis that during Drosophila embryogenesis Tsh functions collaboratively with Hox proteins to pattern segment identity, and at least in the case of Scr physical interactions may promote this homeotic activity. In this regard, Tsh displays similarity to two well-characterized Hox cofactors Extradenticle (Exd) and Homothorax (Hth); homeodomain proteins that bind to Hox proteins altering their DNA binding specificity and affinity (Chan and Mann, 1996; Chan et al., 1996; Mann and Chan, 1996; Ryoo and Mann, 1999; Ryoo et al., 1999).

tsh also has Hox-independent patterning roles throughout Drosophila development. For example, tsh is necessary to maintain late-embryonic wingless (wg) signaling (Gallet et al., 1998). In tsh null embryos the identity of posterior thorax and abdominal segments is not altered; however, wg-dependent regions of naked cuticle are reduced (Gallet et al., 1998). This tsh-dependent modulation of Wg signaling is mediated through physical interaction between Tsh and Armadillo (Arm); a key effector of the canonical Wg signaling pathway (Gallet et al., 1998; Gallet et al., 1999). tsh is also essential for development of a number of adult structures. In leg discs tsh patterns proximal segments (Bessa et al., 2009; Culi et al., 2006; Erkner et al., 1999; Wu and Cohen, 1999; Wu and Cohen, 2000) and dynamic transcriptional regulation of tsh in wing discs permits both blade specification (through its down regulation) and actively promotes proper morphogenesis of the proximal hinge and notum through continued expression in these domains (Azpiazu and Morata, 2000; Casares and Mann, 2000; Soanes et al., 2001; Wu and Cohen, 2002; Zirin and Mann, 2004). Lastly, tsh is a crucial regulator of retinal determination and eye development, functioning to regulate both patterning and proliferation ahead of the morphogenetic furrow (Bessa and Casares, 2005; Bessa et al., 2002; Pan and Rubin, 1998; Singh et al., 2002; Singh et al., 2004). These non-homeotic Tsh functions involve tissue-specific genetic interactions between tsh and other patterning genes, principally wg and hth. For example, Wg represses tsh in the developing wing blade (Ng et al., 1996; Wu and Cohen, 2002); however, in leg discs, wg and tsh overlap and Wg promotes Tsh nuclear translocation (Erkner et al., 1999; Gallet et al., 1998). In the developing eye Tsh expression overlaps with Hth and Eyeless (Ey) and these proteins function cooperatively, likely as a complex, to repress genes ahead of the morphogenetic furrow (Bessa et al., 2002).

tsh function, both homeotic and non-homeotic, is complemented by the paralogous gene tiptop (tio) whose expression in embryos and imaginal discs is coincident with tsh (Bessa et al., 2009; Laugier et al., 2005). Unlike tsh, tio− homozygotes are viable and have no overt developmental defects. Reducing tsh activity by RNAi in tio− embryos greatly enhances larval cuticle defects compared to loss of tsh alone suggesting tio partially compensates for tsh loss (Laugier et al., 2005). Interestingly, tio can rescue tsh− embryonic lethality when driven throughout tsh domains in a hypomorphic tsh-GAL4/tsh− genotype (Bessa et al., 2009). However, significant adult developmental defects, including fused proximal leg segments and poorly developed abdomen, suggest common but potentially divergent functions of these paralogous genes (Bessa et al., 2009).

The homeotic roles of the Hox cofactors Exd and Hth are not limited to embryogenesis but extend throughout larval and pupal development functioning broadly as cofactors with each of the Drosophila Hox proteins (González-Crespo and Morata, 1995; Rauskolb et al., 1995; Ryoo et al., 1999). Whether tsh has homeotic function beyond embryogenesis has not been investigated (Robertson et al., 2004). However, abdominal defects observed in the tio rescue experiments reveal broad and uncharacterized roles for tsh during pupation (Bessa et al., 2009). Here we present expression data and gene knockdown experiments showing that tsh is necessary for homeotic patterning of the adult abdomen. Additionally, by performing tsh knockdown in a tio mutant background we show that as during embryogenesis and imaginal disc development these paralogous genes function semi-redundantly to perform these homeotic activities.

Results

Teashirt expression correlates with BX-C proteins in the pupal abdomen

To investigate tsh adult homeotic activity we first analyzed Tsh protein expression in the developing pupal abdomen for which we have developed a reliable immunohistochemistry protocol (Wang and Yoder, 2011) and in which trunk-specific Hox proteins pattern individual segment identity. The adult abdominal epidermis is derived from imaginal histoblast cells that remain quiescent until proliferation is triggered at pupariation (Madhavan and Madhavan, 1980). Expanding histoblast cells then replace the large polyploid larval epidermal cells (LECs) to form the adult epidermis. Four bilateral pairs of histoblast nests contribute distinct cell populations to each abdominal segment and the three Hox genes of the Bithorax complex (BX-C) Ultrabithorax (Ubx), abdominal-A (abd-A) and Abdominal-B (abd-B) confer distinct fates to each segment (Celniker et al., 1990; Duncan, 1987; Karch et al., 1985; Sánchez-Herrero et al., 1985). For example, in the posterior abdomen Abd-B functions cooperatively with the sex determination transcription factor Doublesex (Dsx) repressing development of the terminal male abdominal segment (A7) and promoting male-specific pigmentation on A5 and A6 (Kopp et al., 2000; Wang and Yoder, 2012; Wang et al., 2011). Tergites and sternites (the dorsal and ventral cuticle plates of each segment) in the posterior abdomen have additional Abd-B dependent sex- and segment-specific morphology and A6 tergites of both sexes as well as female A7 are mostly devoid of trichomes (fine hair-like epithelial extensions) that cover more anterior tergites (Duncan, 1987; Celniker et al., 1990; Kopp et al., 2000; Sánchez-Herrero et al., 1985). Ubx promotes reduced A1 tergite size and unique bristle morphology as well as repressed A1 sternite development while Abd-A principally patterns segments A2–A4, which have similar morphology to one another (Duncan, 1987; Lewis, 1978). Loss of function mutations in any of the BX-C genes transforms these respective segments toward more anterior identity (Celniker et al., 1990; Duncan, 1987; Sánchez-Herrero et al., 1985). Likewise, mitotic clonal analyses of the Hox cofactors exd and hth show strong homeotic transformations throughout the adult body (González-Crespo and Morata, 1995; Rauskolb et al., 1995; Ryoo et al., 1999).

The abdominal defects seen in tio rescue experiments and cursory analyses of adult tsh-lacZ enhancer trap expression suggest tsh should be expressed in the pupal/adult abdomen (Bessa et al., 2009; Bhojwani et al., 1995). We confirmed this prediction by immunohistochemistry. By 26 hr APF (after puparium formation) histoblast nests in each abdominal segment have proliferated and fused into a continuous epithelium. At this stage of development individual abdominal segments are clearly distinguishable as they remain separated by narrow bands of LECs that will soon be removed by apoptosis as the adult epithelium continues development (Kopp et al., 1997). At 26 hr APF, Tsh protein is broadly expressed in both sexes throughout the pupal abdomen in all LECs and histoblast cells (Fig. 1A,B). Tsh expression is not uniform throughout the abdominal epithelium, but instead is slightly elevated in the anterior- and posterior-most segments A1 and A7 compared to mid-abdominal segments (Fig. 1A,B).

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Tsh expression in the pupal abdomen correlates with BX-C protein patterns.

(A,B) Tsh is expressed throughout the developing pupal abdomen of both sexes and is enriched in terminal segments A1 and A7 (labeled). Vertical bars indicate boundaries between adjacent pupal segments. Large polyploidy nuclei (red arrowhead) are of larval epidermal cells and small nuclei are of the imaginal histoblast nests (A5 histoblasts outlined in yellow in A). In all panels pupae are 26 hr APF (after puparium formation). White arrowheads indicate the border between elevated A7 Tsh expression that correlates with elevated Abd-B levels (see D). (C) The A1 enrichment of Tsh (left panel) coincides with high levels of Ubx (middle panel). Border of expression level difference is indicated with a white arrowhead. (D) Posterior enrichment of Tsh in A7 (left panel) also coincides with the highest levels of Abd-B protein (middle panel). Border of expression level difference is indicated with a white arrowhead. (E) Abd-A is absent from segment A1 and significantly reduced in A7. Abd-A expression in A2–A6 correlates with the lower expression of Tsh in these segments (compare to A and B). (F) tio-GAL4>UAS-GFP shows the tsh paralog tio is expressed in a similar segmental pattern with enrichment in A1 and A7. (G) Merged image of Abd-A and tio<GFP as seen in E and F. In merged images Tsh or tio<GFP is green and Ubx, Abd-A and Abd-B are red. In all panels dorsal is up, anterior is left. Scale bars: 100 µm.

The spatially dynamic expression of Tsh suggests regionally distinct transcriptional regulation. BX-C proteins are expressed in discrete domains throughout the developing abdominal epithelium (Kopp and Duncan, 2002; Wang et al., 2011) and tsh is a known target of Hox proteins in the embryonic trunk (Röder et al., 1992). We therefore compared Tsh expression with Ubx, Abd-A and Abd-B. Abdominal Ubx expression is strongest in the anterior compartment of A1 with weaker expression extending into A2 (Fig. 1C) (Kopp and Duncan, 2002). Tsh A1 enrichment is coincident with the strongest Ubx abdominal expression in the anterior compartment of this segment (Fig. 1C). In the posterior abdomen Abd-B is expressed in a gradient from the posterior compartment of A4 through A7 with strongest expression in posterior A6 and A7 (Fig. 1D) (Kopp and Duncan, 2002; Wang et al., 2011). Here Tsh expression is likewise elevated coincident with highest Abd-B levels (Fig. 1D). Abd-A is expressed at moderately lower levels than either Ubx or Abd-B and is restricted from, or its levels significantly reduced, where these neighboring Hox proteins are elevated (Fig. 1E) (Kopp and Duncan, 2002). In mid-abdominal segments, in the absence of high Ubx or Abd-B, Tsh levels are similarly attenuated, but nonetheless robust (Fig. 1A,B). The strict correlation between Tsh and BX-C protein levels and distribution in the pupal abdomen suggest that here, as in the embryo, tsh may be a target of these Hox proteins.

In both embryos and imaginal discs Tsh and Tio are expressed in overlapping patterns (Bessa et al., 2009; Datta et al., 2009; Laugier et al., 2005). We were unable to detect Tio in either the abdominal epithelium or imaginal discs with an anti-Tio antibody used in previous studies (data not shown) (Bessa et al., 2009; Datta et al., 2009; Laugier et al., 2005). We therefore used tio-GAL4 (Datta et al., 2009) to drive GFP and observed broad, but patchy and stochastic, abdominal expression coincident with Tsh protein (Fig. 1F,G). Like Tsh, uas-GFP;tio-GAL4 shows enhanced expression in A1 and A7 compared to mid-abdominal segments. We conclude that as in other tissues examined tsh and tio are expressed in overlapping patterns, likely reflecting similar regulatory control and a compensatory function of tio for tsh activity (Bessa et al., 2009; Laugier et al., 2005).

Spatially dynamic Teashirt expression is positively regulated by BX-C proteins

To test whether adult abdominal tsh expression is regulated downstream of the BX-C proteins, we analyzed Tsh expression in gain or loss of function genotypes as well as null mitotic clones for individual BX-C genes. In the abd-B regulatory gain of function allele Fab-7 Abd-B levels are elevated in A6 to levels comparable to wild type A7 (Fig. 2A) (Gyurkovics et al., 1990). As a result, A6 is transformed toward A7 fate adopting characteristic female A7 morphology and undergoing male-specific reduction. In abd-BFab7 pupae Tsh expression is also elevated in A6 (Fig. 2A) suggesting that it is positively regulated by Abd-B. The regulatory allele Uab5 can be considered both an abd-A gain of function and a Ubx loss of function allele as Abd-A expression expands anteriorly into A1 repressing Ubx (Fig. 2B) (Karch et al., 1990; Lewis, 1978). In Uab5 pupae Tsh A1 expression is reduced compared to wild type and expressed at levels equivalent to A2–A5 suggesting that high levels of Ubx promote elevated Tsh expression (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Tsh expression is positively regulated downstream of the BX-C proteins in the pupal abdomen.

(A) Tsh expression is elevated in posterior A5 and A6 of the abd-B regulatory gain of function allele Fab-7 compared to wild type (compare A to Fig. 1D, arrowheads indicate border of elevated Tsh expression at pA5). Left panel is Tsh and middle panel is Abd-B. (B) Tsh expression is reduced in A1 of the abd-A mis-expression allele Uab5 compared to wild type. As a result of anterior expansion of Abd-A in Uab5 Ubx is eliminated from A1 and Tsh is expressed at levels comparable to wild type A2 (compare B to Fig. 1C). Left panel is Tsh and middle panel is Abd-A. (C) Tsh expression is greatly reduced in abd-B null mitotic clones (outlined). Two adjacent clones in ventral A7 show reduced Tsh expression (left panel) and elimination of Abd-B (middle panel). (D) Conversely, Tsh is up-regulated in abd-A null mitotic clones. Clone in dorsal A3 shows increased expression of Tsh (left panel) and elimination of Abd-A (middle panel, outlined). (E) Similar abd-A clone in A3 of another pupa shows activation of Ubx expression. In merged images Tsh is green and Abd-A and Abd-B are red. In all panels dorsal is up and anterior is left. Scale bars: 100 µm (A,B), 20 µm (C–E).

These abd-B and abd-A/Ubx alleles cause embryonic segmental transformations, therefore the altered Tsh expression we observed may reflect these earlier events rather than Hox-mediated regulation during development of the adult abdominal epithelium. We therefore also generated null mitotic clones of abd-A and abd-B in the developing pupal abdomen to test whether Hox proteins are required to maintain tsh expression during pupation. Consistent with a positive regulatory role, null abd-B clones in A7 lead to strong reduction of Tsh (Fig. 2C). Conversely, Tsh is strongly up regulated in null abd-A clones (Fig. 2D). These results are explained by the genetic interaction of posterior prevalence in which HOM-C proteins negatively regulate transcription of more anteriorly expressed Hox genes (McGinnis and Krumlauf, 1992) As a result Ubx is up-regulated in abd-A mitotic clones (Fig. 2E). This increased Ubx expression likely promotes higher transcription of tsh. Combined, these data show that during pupal abdominal development the BX-C proteins are essential for proper maintenance of Tsh expression consistent with observations during embryogenesis (Fasano et al., 1991).

Tsh has a homeotic role in patterning the adult abdomen

tsh is required for patterning several adult tissues; however, none of these described functions can be characterized as homeotic (Bessa and Casares, 2005; Bessa et al., 2009; Datta et al., 2009; Erkner et al., 1999; Laugier et al., 2005; Pan and Rubin, 1998; Singh et al., 2002; Singh et al., 2004; Wu and Cohen, 1999; Wu and Cohen, 2002). Rather, in each case (eye, leg and wing imaginal disc) tsh functions in a Hox-independent fashion to regulate proliferation and patterning through genetic interactions with other key developmental genes (Bessa et al., 2002; Erkner et al., 1999).

Although expression of tio in the tsh domain can rescue tsh embryonic lethality several adult phenotypes, including severe abdominal developmental defects, were observed suggesting only partial compensation by tio for loss of tsh (Bessa et al., 2009). We repeated this experiment to more closely analyze adult abdominal phenotypes. Pupae of this genotype do not eclose and die at various stages of late pupal development. In the most advanced pupae, tergites and sternites are developed and have differentiated bristles and trichomes; however, they fail to fuse at the dorsal and ventral midlines (Fig. 3D). Similar phenotypes are observed upon perturbing the cell cycle of abdominal histoblasts (Ninov et al., 2007; Ninov et al., 2009) suggesting that tsh contributes to regulating histoblast proliferation, consistent with observations in other developing adult tissue (Bessa et al., 2002).

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Developmental defects of tio rescue flies suggest adult homeotic function for tsh.

(A,B) Adult abdominal cuticle preparations of wild type male and female flies. (C) Dorsal cuticle preparation of wild type adult male A5–A6. (D) Dorsal cuticle preparation of tsh-GAL4/tsh−;UAS-tio adult male A4–A6 shows proliferation defects resulting in failed fusion of lateral hemitergites. (E) The T3 laterotergite of wild type flies (marked by a yellow line) is a thin band of tissue separating T2 and A1. (F) In tsh-GAL4/tsh−;UAS-tio flies the T3 laterotergite is expanded (outlined by a yellow border) and often generates bristles (arrowhead). Dashed line outlines the haltere. (G) Wild type males lack an A7 tergite. As a result no sclerotized cuticle or bristles are located between the A6 tergite and the genitalia. (H) In tsh-GAL4/tsh−;UAS-tio males a small A7 tergite develops (outlined) with supernumerary bristles (arrowheads). (H′) shows the same image with outline and arrowheads removed for clarity. ga, genital arch derived from the genital disc. In A–F anterior is up. Scale bars: 200 µm (A,B), 100 µm (C–F), 50 µm (G,H).

Although these proliferation defects prevent thorough analysis of segment identity we found two phenotypes that suggest tsh contributes to homeotic patterning of the adult thorax and abdomen. In wild type flies Ubx represses most thoracic tissue derived from the dorsal T3 disc with the exception of halteres. As a result, only a thin band of laterotergite separates the wing-bearing T2 mesothorax and abdominal A1 (Fig. 3E) (Hittinger et al., 2005). In strong Ubx loss of function adults the T3 laterotergite is transformed toward T2 identity characterized by expanded size and the presence of bristles. We observed similar T3 transformations in these tsh-GAL4/tsh−;uas-tio/+ pupae (Fig. 3F). Additionally, in wild type D. melanogaster males Abd-B and Dsx cooperatively repress male A7 development (Kopp et al., 2000; Wang and Yoder, 2012; Wang et al., 2011). As a consequence neither tergite nor bristles develop between male A6 and the genitalia (Fig. 3G). However, some tsh-GAL4/tsh−;uas-tio/+ males develop small A7 tergites identifiable by the presence of small cuticle plates and associated bristles (Fig. 3H, cuticle outlined and arrowheads indicating ectopic bristles). These two observations suggest that either tsh is required for proper homeotic patterning in the developing abdomen and this activity is not fully rescued by ectopic tio or alternatively that ectopic tio interferes with the function of other homeotic genes.

To distinguish between these possibilities we used RNAi to reduce tsh activity in the developing pupal abdomen. tsh is located close to the centromere of chromosome 2 preventing construction of FRT linked chromosomes for mitotic recombination experiments. Additionally, the induction of widespread tsh-RNAi clones leads to pupal death at various stages of development preventing analyses of adult segment morphology (Bessa et al., 2009). We therefore used the GAL4;UAS system to conditionally knock down tsh activity by driving expression of a double-stranded-tsh construct (UAS-ds-tsh) throughout the developing pupal abdomen. Because tio functions redundantly with tsh in other tissues, we also performed tsh-RNAi experiments in a tio loss of function background. Our results show that tsh functions broadly to help establish proper segment identity throughout the abdomen and that as during embryonic and imaginal disc development tio plays a redundant role in this homeotic activity.

To circumvent embryonic tsh requirements and potentially lethal pupal pleiotropy we used a dsx-GAL4 driver which, as we have previously shown, drives broad expression in all abdominal histoblast cells (Rideout et al., 2010; Wang and Yoder, 2012). Importantly, this driver has very limited embryonic expression and is absent from the LECs, therefore we can be confident that observed phenotypes are due to tsh requirements during pupal development and do not result from altered homeotic activity during embryogenesis. We confirmed by immunohistochemistry that Tsh expression is significantly reduced, but not completely eliminated, within all developing abdominal segments in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh pupae (data not shown). Additionally, all pupae fully mature and eclose allowing detailed cuticle characterization.

We predicted that if Tsh has adult homeotic activity then reducing its expression throughout the pupal abdomen should produce transformations similar to exd and hth mutant clones; anterior and posterior segments should be transformed toward mid-abdominal fates (González-Crespo and Morata, 1995; Rauskolb et al., 1995; Ryoo et al., 1999). Analyses of adult dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh cuticles confirmed these predictions. Reduction of Tsh activity partially restores male A7 development (100%; n = 19) (Fig. 4B, arrowheads) and leads to fusion of female A7 laterotergites (100%; n = 22) (Fig. 4D, arrowhead), both characteristics of A7 transformation toward anterior segment identity. Additionally, in wild-type adults, A6 tergites of both sexes, and A7 of females, are mostly devoid of trichomes that cover tergites on A1–A5 (Fig. 4C). However, in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh A6 trichomes are restored in both sexes (100%; n = 25) (Fig. 4D). The ventral sternite cuticle of male A6 also has characteristic wild-type morphology that is transformed anteriorly in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh flies. Wild-type male A6 sternites are U-shaped and lack sensory bristles found on more anterior sternites (Fig. 4A). However, in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh males, A6 sternites are rectangular (100%; n = 19), like more anterior segments, and occasionally develop 1–2 sensory bristles (58%; n = 19: 9 individuals with one bristle; 2 individuals with 2 bristles) (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Adult homeotic transformations associated with reducing tsh expression during pupal abdominal development.

(A) Ventral cuticle of adult wild type male. A6 sternites (center) have a characteristic horseshoe shape and are devoid of bristles. Neither A7 tergites nor sternites develop. As a result of A7 reduction during pupation A7 spiracles are associated with A6, which therefore has two spiracles adjacent to each tergite (arrowheads). (B) In dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh males A6 sternites are rectangular, similar to more anterior sternites (compare with Fig. 3A), and often develop 1–2 supernumerary bristles. Additionally, A7 spiracles are positioned more posterior than in wild type males and are associated with small A7 tergites (arrowheads). (C) Dorsal cuticle of adult wild type female showing tergites A5–A7. The laterotergites of A7 never fuse at the dorsal midline (arrowhead) and remain triangular hemitergites. Additionally, in both sexes, tergite A6 is devoid of trichomes as seen in magnification of boxed area (C′). (D) In dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh females A7 tergites are fused and pigmented at the dorsal midline indicating transformation toward anterior identity. Additionally, in both sexes, trichomes are present on A6 as seen in magnification of the boxed area (D′). (E) Ventral cuticle of wild type male showing sternite A2 and absence of sternite A1. (F) In dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh flies A1 is partially transformed toward posterior identity as indicated by the presence of a sclerotized cuticle plate (sternite; right half outlined with dashed line) and a supernumerary bristle (arrowhead). In all panels anterior is up. Scale bars: 100µm.

In addition to posterior abdominal transformations, segment A1 is also transformed upon reduction of Tsh activity. Consistent with exd clonal analyses this transformation is toward more posterior segment identity. In wild-type flies segment A1 does not generate a ventral sternite (Fig. 4E); however, dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh adults show sclerotized ventral cuticle plates (100%; n = 19) that occasionally develop a single sensory bristle (26%; 5/19 individuals) (Fig. 4F).

Together these observations suggest that during pupation, as during embryogenesis, tsh functions cooperatively with trunk-specific Hox genes to pattern segments of the adult abdomen. The homeotic phenotypes described here are weaker than those reported for exd mitotic clones and gynandromorphs (González-Crespo and Morata, 1995; Rauskolb et al., 1995). Furthermore, one abdominal character, male-specific pigmentation, which is under direct regulation of Abd-B (Jeong et al., 2006; Williams et al., 2008), showed no phenotypic alteration in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh adults. Because Tsh protein in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh pupae is reduced but not eliminated, it is likely the degree of the observed homeotic phenotypes reflects activity of residual Tsh. Additionally, we have previously shown that target gene expression under control of this driver is spatiotemporally dynamic (Wang and Yoder, 2012). Prior to 26 hr APF dsx-GAL4 promotes robust expression in all A7 histoblast cells with weaker and ventro-laterally restricted expression in more anterior segments. After 28 hr APF, this driver promotes strong and ubiquitous expression in all abdominal histoblasts. Therefore, moderate or weak tsh-RNAi phenotypes in mid-abdominal segments, especially in dorsal tissue, may reflect these spatiotemporal dsx-GAL4 dynamics. To circumvent this issue we used two additional drivers (abd-A-GAL4 and pannier-GAL4) to express ds-tsh. abd-A-GAL4 drives strong expression in segments A2–A6 (with weaker expression in A7) and pnr-GAL4 drives expression in a stripe of cells along the dorsal midline, including the dorsal-most histoblast cells. Both drivers are expressed from embryogenesis through adult development, and therefore promote expression of ds-tsh throughout all stages of histoblast proliferation and development. These experiments show that tsh plays an important role in patterning all adult abdominal segments. Strikingly, abd-A-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh transforms adult A2–A7 toward A1 identity. Tergite bristles are fewer in number than in wild type A2–A7 and adopt a short, stout bristle morphology characteristic of A1 (Fig. 5A). Additionally A2–A7 tergite pigmentation is modified toward A1 and sternites are reduced in size or absent reflecting A1 identity (Fig. 5A). ds-tsh expressed along the dorsal midline under control of pnr-GAL4 not only restores trichomes in tergite A6 but is also partially effective at repressing male-specific pigmentation (Fig. 5C). Also, as observed in exd thoracic mitotic clones, reduction of tsh expression in pnr-GAL4 flies suppresses bristle development (Fig. 5C) (González-Crespo and Morata, 1995).

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Additional adult homeotic phenotypes revealed through earlier reduction of tsh expression.

(A) In abd-A-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh, tsh expression is knocked down throughout the abdomen, likely from early embryogenesis throughout pupal development. The result is a strong homeotic transformation of segments A2–A7 toward A1 identity. Bristles adopt a short and stout morphology characteristic of A1. Additionally, the band of pigmentation at the posterior margin of each tergite is restricted to the most dorsal domains as in wild type A1 (compare A with Fig. 3B) and sternites are reduced in size or absent. (B) Control male dorsal cuticle showing tergites A4–A6. The genotype is pnr-GAL4, abd-BMcp/TM6B. abd-BMcp is a regulatory gain-of-function allele resulting in expanded expression of abd-B into A4. As a result A4 is darkly pigmented similar to wild type A5–A6; however, note absence of pigmentation in patches of A4. (C) In pnr-GAL4, abd-BMcp/UAS-ds-tsh pigmentation is reduced along the ventral midline in A4–A6. Also, note reduction in bristle number within the domain of tsh reduction. Scale bars: 200 µm (A), 100 µm (B,C).

Partial redundancy between tio and tsh

Reduction of tsh expression by RNAi in a tio null background dramatically enhances larval segment and adult leg phenotypes compared to tsh-RNAi alone reflecting partially redundant functions between these paralogous genes (Bessa et al., 2009; Laugier et al., 2005). To investigate similar redundancy between tsh and tio during adult abdominal development we reduced tsh expression in a tio null background (tio473;dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh). In this genotype adult survivorship was reduced compared to wild type and dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh (percent eclosed 73%; 24/33 pupae scored). However, all uneclosed flies reached pupal development and could be removed from the pupal case for cuticle analysis.

Neither male nor female A7 transformations were clearly enhanced in tio473;dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh abdomen. As in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh A7 tergite development was partially restored in all males and all female A7 laterotergites fused at the dorsal midline (Fig. 6A,B). Likewise, we observed no dramatic increase in the number or density of trichomes restored on A6 tergites of either sex (Fig. 6B). We therefore used bristle number on A1 and male A6 sternites to compare the degree of transformation in these two genotypes. In dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh 47% of males (9/19) develop a single bristle on sternite A6 while 10% (2/19) possess 2 bristles. In tio473;dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh 80% of males (n = 21) generate one or more A6 sternite bristles and the number of bristles is increased compared to dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh (single bristle = 3, two bristles = 12 and three bristles = 4) (Fig. 6A). As in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh 100% (n = 21) of tio473;dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh flies develop an A1 sternite; however, the number of flies with A1 sternite bristles (74%; n = 19) and the number of bristles is increased (single bristle = 4, two bristles = 8, 2 three bristles = 2 and 4 bristles = 1) (Fig. 6C). The increased penetrance of homeotic transformation in tio473;dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh indicates that as during embryogenesis and imaginal disc development, tio function can partially compensate for loss of tsh.

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. tsh homeotic phenotypes are enhanced in tio− mutant background indicating functional redundancy.

(A) Ventral cuticle of adult male tio−;dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh. As in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh male A6 sternites are transformed toward anterior identity and adopt a rectangular shape. However, more flies possess A6 sternite bristles and bristle number is increased; three bristles in this sample (compare to Fig. 4B) (see text for details). Additionally, as in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh A7 spiracles are posteriorly displaced and small A7 tergites develop (arrowheads). (B) Also as in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh female A7 laterotergites are fused and pigmented at the dorsal midline (arrowhead) indicating anterior transformation. Additionally, in both sexes, trichomes are present on A6 as seen in magnification of the boxed area (B′). (C) A1 transformation is greatly enhanced in dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh adults. More flies possess A1 sternite bristles and bristle number is increased; four bristles in this sample (compare to Fig. 4E,F) (see text for details). The right half of the transformed A1 sternite is outlined with dashed line. In all panels anterior is up. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Homeotic activity through regulation of Hox target genes

Finally we addressed the mechanism of tsh homeotic activity during adult abdominal development. During embryogenesis tsh is positively regulated downstream of trunk-specific HOM-C genes but is not required for maintenance of Hox expression. Therefore tsh homeotic activity in the embryo is not a result of its regulating Hox expression. We asked whether BX-C protein expression in the pupal abdomen is likewise independent of tsh activity by investigating expression of each protein in pnr-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh pupae. This genotype provides an internal control for assessing protein levels as only the dorsal-most cells of each histoblast nest express ds-tsh. We found no evidence that tsh is necessary for proper BX-C expression as neither Ubx, Abd-A nor Abd-B levels are altered upon tsh knockdown (Fig. 7A–C).

Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. tsh is not required for maintenance of BX-C protein expression.

Knock down of tsh in pnr-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh does not alter expression of either Abd-B (A), Abd-A (B) or Ubx (C). In each series the left panel is Tsh and the middle panel is the indicated BX-C protein. Reduction of Tsh is apparent in the dorsal-most half of each dorsal histoblast nest. In merge panels Tsh is green and BX-C protein is red. Abd-B and Ubx labeled pupae are 26 hr APF. The Abd-A labeled pupa is a 36 hr APF male, note the absence of segment A7 that is completely reduced by 36 hr APF. In all panels dorsal is up, anterior is left. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Next we investigated expression of known targets of one abdominal Hox protein to confirm that altered target gene expression correlates with specific homeotic phenotypes. Three Abd-B targets have been characterized that contribute to male-specific characters in the adult abdomen. The bric-a-brac (bab) locus encodes a pair of paralogous transcription factors involved in many developmental processes and Abd-B and Dsx directly repress bab in male A5–A6 promoting characteristic male-specific pigmentation of D. melanogaster (Williams et al., 2008). Additionally, we have shown that Abd-B and Dsx repress wingless in male A7 leading to loss of this segment in adults (Wang et al., 2011) and that Abd-B positively regulates dsx during early pupation (Wang and Yoder, 2012). We therefore predicted that Wg and Bab repression would be partially relieved and that Dsx expression would be reduced following knockdown of tsh expression in in pnr-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh pupae. Indeed, ectopic Wg expression was observed in male A7 (Fig. 8B, arrowhead) and Bab was elevated along the A5–A6 dorsal midline in pnr-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh males (Fig. 8D, arrowheads and magnified insets). However, we observed no down-regulation of Dsx in this genotype (Fig. 8C). The differences in response to tsh knockdown between these three Abd-B targets may reflect differential sensitivity of each gene to partial depletion of tsh. Alternatively, the difference in response by positively versus negatively regulated Abd-B targets may be evidence of the collaborative mode of Tsh homeotic activity (see Discussion).

Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. Knock down of tsh expression leads to dysregulation of a subset of Abd-B targets.

(A) Wild type 26 hr APF male pupa co-labeled for Tsh (green) and Wg (red). Wg expression is repressed by Abd-B and Dsx in male A7. (B) Male pnr-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh pupa at 26 hr APF also co-labeled for Tsh and Wg. Tsh expression is strongly reduced, but not eliminated, in the dorsal-most half of each dorsal nest (left panel). Wg expression is de-repressed in A7 (middle panel, arrowhead). Inset in each panel are the dorsal-most cells of A7 showing reduction of Tsh expression and concomitant de-repression of Wg. (C) High levels of Abd-B in A7 positively regulate Dsx expression; however, reduction of Tsh (left panel and green in merge) does not alter Dsx levels (middle panel and red in merge). (D) Dsx expression in wild type male at similar developmental stage for comparison. (E) Bab1 expression in pnr-GAL4, abd-BMcp/+ male pupa. Bab1 is expressed in A1–A3 and repressed by Abd-B in A4–A6. (F) In pnr-GAL4, abd-BMcp/UAS-ds-tsh males expression of ds-Tsh along the dorsal midline de-represses Bab1 expression in A4–A6 (arrowheads). In all panels dorsal is up and anterior is left. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Finally, we investigated whether phenotypic similarities between reduction of Tsh activity in the developing abdomen and Exd/Hth abdominal mitotic clones reflects functional interdependency between these homeotic collaborators. Exd functions as a homeotic cofactor through direct association with Hox proteins, leading to altered DNA binding specific and affinity. Exd nuclear localization is dynamic throughout development and its nuclear translocation requires physical interaction with Hth (Rieckhof et al., 1997). In the developing eye Tsh was found to directly interact with Hth, forming a putative trimeric complex along with Eyeless (Bessa et al., 2002). Such physical associations between Tsh and Hth may modulate the latter's ability to promote Exd nuclear translocation. Furthermore, in wing and antennal discs ectopic Tsh can maintain Hth protein expression outside of its normal domain indicating a possible regulatory role for Tsh in Hth expression (Bessa et al., 2002; Bessa et al., 2009). However, in these tissues tsh-RNAi clones do not alter normal hth expression or Exd nuclear accumulation (Bessa et al., 2009). These data suggest that in this developmental context Tsh does not participate in hth transcriptional regulation. To investigate whether the Tsh adult homeotic activity we have characterized may be an ultimate consequence of regulating Exd subcellular distribution we investigated expression of both Hth and Exd in Tsh-RNAi pupae. In wild type pupae Hth is ubiquitously expressed in all abdominal histoblasts and LECs (Fig. 9A; data not shown). Upon reduction of Tsh activity in pnr-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh pupae Hth expression is unaltered and remains at expression levels similar to wild type within histoblast cells (Fig. 9B). We therefore conclude that here, as in other imaginal tissue, Tsh does not regulate hth transcription. In wild type pupae Exd is also expressed in all abdominal histoblasts and LECs (Fig. 10A). Exd expression is much weaker compared to Hth and is enriched in ventral compared to dorsal histoblast cells (not shown). Because Exd expression is extremely weak in dorsal cells we compared its expression in ventral histoblasts between wild type and dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh pupae. As with Hth, neither Exd expression levels nor intracellular distribution were altered upon reducing Tsh activity. These observations are consistent with similar Exd expression analyses performed in wing and antennal imaginal discs (Bessa et al., 2009) and suggest that the homeotic function of Tsh is not mediated through promoting either expression or nuclear accumulation of Hth or Exd.

Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. Knock down of tsh expression does not alter expression of Homothorax.

(A) Hth expression in dorsal nest (A5) of wild type 26 hr APF male pupa. Hth expression is ubiquitous and nuclear localized in all abdominal histoblasts and remaining LECs. (B) Hth expression in dorsal nest (A5) of male pnr-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh. Reducing expression of Tsh alters neither Hth expression levels nor nuclear localization. (C) Tsh expression in contralateral control segment A5 of same pupa in B showing extent of Tsh down-regulation in the dorsal-most histoblast cells. Because anti-Hth and anti-Tsh antibodies were raised in the same species this method was used to estimate the extent of Tsh repression in the experimental sample (B). In all images dorsal is up and anterior is left. Scale bars: 25 µm.

Fig. 10.
Fig. 10. Knock down of tsh expression does not alter expression of Extradenticle.

(A) Exd expression in ventral nest (A4) of wild type 26 hr APF male pupa. Exd expression is weak, but ubiquitous and nuclear localized in all abdominal histoblasts and remaining LECs. (B) Exd expression in ventral nest (A4) of male Dsx-GAL4/UAS-ds-tsh. Reducing expression of Tsh throughout the pupae alters neither Exd expression levels nor nuclear localization. The clusters of bright DAPI positive nuclei in B are associated with tracheal tubes beneath the abdominal epithelium. In all images dorsal is up and anterior is left. Scale bars: 25 µm.

Discussion

Products of the Drosophila HOM-C genes positionally specify segment identity along the anteroposterior axis through independent and combinatorial actions reflecting their spatially restricted expression domains. In vitro, individual Hox proteins exhibit weak target specificity due to high affinity for a shared and abundant target DNA binding sequence (Ekker et al., 1994; Gehring et al., 1994; Hoey and Levine, 1988). However, in vivo Hox proteins possess a high degree of target specificity and regulate unique suites of genes within their respective domains. Several non-exclusive mechanisms are proposed to aid in generating this target specificity including, but not limited to, dimerization of individual Hox proteins (Papadopoulos et al., 2012), collaborative regulation with other transcription factors (Gebelein et al., 2004; Williams et al., 2008) and physical interaction with cofactors that alter Hox DNA binding specificity (Chan and Mann, 1996; Mann and Chan, 1996). Tsh has been proposed to function as such a cofactor based upon its broad effect on embryonic trunk-specific Hox activity and its observed physical interaction with Scr (Robertson et al., 2004; Taghli-Lamallem et al., 2007). In this single example of target co-regulation by Tsh and Scr the binding sites of the respective transcription factors are not immediately adjacent and no cooperative binding was observed, and therefore it has been cautioned that without additional data Tsh should be considered a genetic collaborator rather than a cofactor (Mann et al., 2009).

We have described the first detailed characterization of Tsh expression in the Drosophila pupal abdomen and provided the first evidence that Tsh functions as a homeotic patterning protein during adult Drosophila development. Additionally, our analyses show that as during embryogenesis and imaginal disc development the tsh paralog tio functions redundantly with tsh for these patterning functions. Our data show that the homeotic functions of tsh are not limited to embryogenesis and the choice between trunk versus head identity. Rather, conditional reduction of tsh expression during pupation reveals a crucial collaborative role with the HOM-C genes throughout development as exemplified by its necessity to establish proper fate in all adult abdominal segments.

Here we note an interesting correlation with observations following RNAi against the single tsh/tio homolog in the red flour beetle T. castaneum (Tc-tiotsh). Reduction of Tc-tiotsh during embryogenesis does not promote a trunk toward head transformation, suggesting the embryonic trunk-specifying activity of Drosophila tsh may not be conserved throughout insects (Shippy et al., 2008). Likewise, neither thoracic nor abdominal segmental transformations were observed upon RNAi against the tsh/tio homolog in the Hemipteran insect O. fasciatus (Herke et al., 2005). Rather, in basal insects the principle patterning function of the tsh homolog appears to be restricted to leg segmentation. However, when Tc-tiotsh is reduced during larval development adult segments display strikingly similar phenotypes to those described here, such as the apparent transformation of ventral A2 and A3 toward more posterior identity (Shippy et al., 2008). Therefore functional interactions between tsh homologs and trunk specifying Hox proteins appear to be evolutionarily conserved at least within the holometabolous insects.

Combined with earlier observations of the homeotic activity of Tsh during embryogenesis (Fasano et al., 1991; Röder et al., 1992), these data deepen similarities between the interactions of Hox proteins with Tsh and the Hox cofactors Exd/Hth. Like Exd/Hth, we have shown that Tsh is required from embryogenesis throughout adult development to aid in Hox-mediated patterning. Though not as severe, the abdominal segment transformations described here are similar to those produced by exd and hth mitotic clones (González-Crespo and Morata, 1995; Rauskolb et al., 1995; Ryoo et al., 1999). Additionally, our analyses of Hth and Exd expression in tsh-RNAi pupae suggest that the phenotypic similarities are not the result of Tsh-mediated regulation of hth or exd transcription or nuclear localization of their protein products. The difference in degree of transformation between our analyses of tsh and those of exd/hth may reflect incomplete penetrance due to residual tsh expression. However, this may also be indicative of differences in the modes of cooperative gene regulation between Hox proteins and these transcription factors. For example, exd contributes to both positive and negative regulation of Hox target genes (Mann et al., 2009); however, the only characterized Hox/Tsh targets are repressed through these collaborative interactions (Alexandre et al., 1996; Coiffier et al., 2008; Robertson et al., 2004). We found that only products of repressed Abd-B targets (Wg and Bab1) showed altered expression following tsh knock down. Expression of Dsx, which is activated downstream of Abd-B, was not affected. While again, this failure to alter regulation of Dsx may be a consequence of incomplete tsh knock down another possibility is that Tsh serves as a dedicated Hox corepressor similar to characterized Hox/Engrailed interactions (Gebelein et al., 2004).

Our data do not provide evidence to either support or refute the Hox cofactor status of Tsh. However, regardless of the mode of interaction between Tsh and Hox proteins, our observations of similar homeotic phenotypes provide evidence that Hox/Tsh and Hox/Exd/Hth interactions likely regulate overlapping suites of target genes and therefore function cooperatively in at least some of their actions. Characterization of target regulation through analysis of Hox, Tsh and Exd/Hth responsive cis-regulatory elements (CREs) will be necessary to determine whether Hox/Tsh and Hox/Exd/Hth act on the same or distinct CREs and, if on the same elements, whether their actions are independent or collaborative.

Materials and Methods

Fly stocks

The following stocks were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center at Indiana University: ds-tsh (tsh-RNAi) is a pVALIUM20-derived transgene generated by the Transgenic RNAi Project at Harvard Medical School (Ni et al., 2011). Tsh-GAL4 is a hypomorphic allele resulting from P-element insertion at the tsh locus. The UAS-gfp transgene used is located on LG II and the hs-flp transgene is on the X chromosome. w*; FRT82B, Ubi-GFP/TM3, Sb1 was used to generate mitotic clones. pnr-GAL4 drives expression in a longitudinal stripe along the dorsal midline from embryogenesis through pupal development. abd-AUab5 is an X chromosome translocation that alters transcriptional regulation of abd-A. abd-BMcp is a regulatory allele that expands abd-B expression throughout A4. The pnr-GAL4, abd-BMcp stock was generated by standard recombination crosses.

tio473 is an imprecise P-element excision that removes the tio open reading frame and 3.6 kb of surrounding sequence (Laugier et al., 2005) and was used in combination with dsx-GAL4 and UAS-ds-tsh for the redundancy analyses. tio-GAL4 (A. Singh) is on LG II. tsh2757R8 is a reversion of a tsh enhancer trap (Andrew et al., 1994) and was used in combination with tsh-GAL4 and UAS-tio for the rescue experiment. These tsh and tio stocks were obtained from J. Kumar. dsx-GAL4 is an in-frame homologous recombination transgene that maintains functional endogenous dsx expression and was a gift from E. Rideout (Rideout et al., 2010). The FRT82B, abd-BM5, FRT82B, abd-AM1, and abd-A-GAL4 stocks were gifts from E. Sanchez-Herrero. abd-BFab-7 is a deletion removing a boundary element at the abd-B locus and was a gift from F. Karch (Gyurkovics et al., 1990).

Antibodies

Antibodies against Abd-B (clone 1A2E9), Exd (clone B11M), Ubx (clone FP3.38) and Wg (clone 4D4) were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (Celniker et al., 1989; Neumann and Cohen, 1996; White and Wilcox, 1984; Aspland and White, 1997). Antibodies against Tsh, Tio, Bab1, Hth and Abd-A were kindly provided by S. Cohen, L. Fasano, T. Williams, A. Salzberg and I. Duncan respectively (Alexandre et al., 1996; Kellerman et al., 1990; Ng et al., 1996; Williams et al., 2008; Kurant et al., 1998). Fluorescent secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor® 488 and 555 (Invitrogen).

Immunohistochemistry and cuticle preparations

Pupae were dissected, fixed and stained as previously described (Wang and Yoder, 2011). Dilutions of primary antibodies were as follows: mouse-anti-Abd-B (1:250), mouse-anti-Ubx (1:100), mouse-anti-Wg (1:250), rabbit-anti-Tsh (1:3000), rat-anti-Tio (1:20–1:500), rabbit-anti-Bab1 (1:100), mouse-anti-Abd-A (1:100), rabbit-anti-Hth (1:1000) and mouse-anti-Exd (1:5). For Hth and Exd images samples were incubated with primary antibody for two days in PBS +0.3% Triton X-100. All secondary antibodies were diluted 1:250 in PBS. Samples were then washed and counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and equilibrated in 75% glycerol. Samples were mounted in 0.8 mm depression well slides and imaged using a Nikon 90i fluorescent microscope equipped with an Optigrid structured illumination accessory (Qioptiq). Cuticles were prepared as previous described (Wang et al., 2011).

Mitotic clones

To generate abd-B and abd-A mitotic clones the following stocks were constructed: hsFlp;;FRT82B, abd-AM1/FRT82B, Ubi-GFP and hsFlp;;FRT82B, abd-BM5/FRT82B, Ubi-GFP. White pre-pupae were then collected and subjected to a one-hour 37°C heat pulse and returned to 25°C until times indicated prior to preparation for dissection and immunohistochemistry.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Justin Kumar (University of Indiana), Ernesto Sanchez-Herrero (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), Laurent Fasano (CNRS, Marseille), Ian Duncan (Washington University), Adi Salzberg (Rappaport Institute, Haifa) and the Bloomington Stock Center (Indiana University) for reagents and fly stocks, and J. O'Donnell for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by Grant IOS-0919891 from the National Science Foundation (to J.H.Y.).

Footnotes

  • Competing interests The authors have no competing interests to declare.

  • Received August 22, 2012.
  • Accepted September 24, 2012.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alexandre E.,
    2. Graba Y.,
    3. Fasano L.,
    4. Gallet A.,
    5. Perrin L.,
    6. De Zulueta P.,
    7. Pradel J.,
    8. Kerridge S.,
    9. Jacq B.
    (1996). The Drosophila teashirt homeotic protein is a DNA-binding protein and modulo, a HOM-C regulated modifier of variegation, is a likely candidate for being a direct target gene. Mech. Dev. 59, 191–204. doi:10.1016/0925-4773(96)00594-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Andrew D. J.,
    2. Horner M. A.,
    3. Petitt M. G.,
    4. Smolik S. M.,
    5. Scott M. P.
    (1994). Setting limits on homeotic gene function: restraint of Sex combs reduced activity by teashirt and other homeotic genes. EMBO J. 13, 1132–1144.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Aspland S. E.,
    2. White R. A.
    (1997). Nucleocytoplasmic localisation of extradenticle protein is spatially regulated throughout development in Drosophila. Development 124, 741–747.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. ↵
    1. Azpiazu N.,
    2. Morata G.
    (2000). Function and regulation of homothorax in the wing imaginal disc of Drosophila. Development 127, 2685–2693.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    1. Bessa J.,
    2. Casares F.
    (2005). Restricted teashirt expression confers eye-specific responsiveness to Dpp and Wg signals during eye specification in Drosophila. Development 132, 5011–5020. doi:10.1242/dev.02082
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Bessa J.,
    2. Gebelein B.,
    3. Pichaud F.,
    4. Casares F.,
    5. Mann R. S.
    (2002). Combinatorial control of Drosophila eye development by eyeless, homothorax, and teashirt. Genes Dev. 16, 2415–2427. doi:10.1101/gad.1009002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Bessa J.,
    2. Carmona L.,
    3. Casares F.
    (2009). Zinc-finger paralogues tsh and tio are functionally equivalent during imaginal development in Drosophila and maintain their expression levels through auto- and cross-negative feedback loops. Dev. Dyn. 238, 19–28. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21808
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Bhojwani J.,
    2. Singh A.,
    3. Misquitta L.,
    4. Mishra A.,
    5. Sinha P.
    (1995). Search for Drosophila genes based on patterned expression of mini-white reporter gene of a P lacW vector in adult eyes. Dev. Genes Evol. 205, 114–121.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Casares F.,
    2. Mann R. S.
    (2000). A dual role for homothorax in inhibiting wing blade development and specifying proximal wing identities in Drosophila. Development 127, 1499–1508.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  10. ↵
    1. Celniker S. E.,
    2. Keelan D. J.,
    3. Lewis E. B.
    (1989). The molecular genetics of the bithorax complex of Drosophila: characterization of the products of the Abdominal-B domain. Genes Dev. 3, 1424–1436. doi:10.1101/gad.3.9.1424
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Celniker S. E.,
    2. Sharma S.,
    3. Keelan D. J.,
    4. Lewis E. B.
    (1990). The molecular genetics of the bithorax complex of Drosophila: cis-regulation in the Abdominal-B domain. EMBO J. 9, 4277–4286.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Chan S. K.,
    2. Mann R. S.
    (1996). A structural model for a homeotic protein-extradenticle-DNA complex accounts for the choice of HOX protein in the heterodimer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 5223–5228. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.11.5223
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Chan S. K.,
    2. Pöpperl H.,
    3. Krumlauf R.,
    4. Mann R. S.
    (1996). An extradenticle-induced conformational change in a HOX protein overcomes an inhibitory function of the conserved hexapeptide motif. EMBO J. 15, 2476–2487.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Coiffier D.,
    2. Charroux B.,
    3. Kerridge S.
    (2008). Common functions of central and posterior Hox genes for the repression of head in the trunk of Drosophila. Development 135, 291–300. doi:10.1242/dev.009662
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Culi J.,
    2. Aroca P.,
    3. Modolell J.,
    4. Mann R. S.
    (2006). jingis required for wing development and to establish the proximo-distal axis of the leg in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173, 255–266. doi:10.1534/genetics.106.056341
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Datta R. R.,
    2. Lurye J. M.,
    3. Kumar J. P.
    (2009). Restriction of ectopic eye formation by Drosophila teashirt and tiptop to the developing antenna. Dev. Dyn. 238, 2202–2210. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21927
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. de Zulueta P.,
    2. Alexandre E.,
    3. Jacq B.,
    4. Kerridge S.
    (1994). Homeotic complex and teashirt genes co-operate to establish trunk segmental identities in Drosophila. Development 120, 2287–2296.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  18. ↵
    1. Duncan I.
    (1987). The bithorax complex. Annu. Rev. Genet. 21, 285–319. doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.21.120187.001441
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Ekker S. C.,
    2. Jackson D. G.,
    3. von Kessler D. P.,
    4. Sun B. I.,
    5. Young K. E.,
    6. Beachy P. A.
    (1994). The degree of variation in DNA sequence recognition among four Drosophila homeotic proteins. EMBO J. 13, 3551–3560.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Erkner A.,
    2. Gallet A.,
    3. Angelats C.,
    4. Fasano L.,
    5. Kerridge S.
    (1999). The role of Teashirt in proximal leg development in Drosophila: ectopic teashirt expression reveals different cell behaviours in ventral and dorsal domains. Dev. Biol. 215, 221–232. doi:10.1006/dbio.1999.9452
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Fasano L.,
    2. Röder L.,
    3. Coré N.,
    4. Alexandre E.,
    5. Vola C.,
    6. Jacq B.,
    7. Kerridge S.
    (1991). The gene teashirt is required for the development of Drosophila embryonic trunk segments and encodes a protein with widely spaced zinc finger motifs. Cell 64, 63–79. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90209-H
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Gallet A.,
    2. Erkner A.,
    3. Charroux B.,
    4. Fasano L.,
    5. Kerridge S.
    (1998). Trunk-specific modulation of wingless signalling in Drosophila by teashirt binding to armadillo. Curr. Biol. 8, 893–902. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00369-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Gallet A.,
    2. Angelats C.,
    3. Erkner A.,
    4. Charroux B.,
    5. Fasano L.,
    6. Kerridge S.
    (1999). The C-terminal domain of armadillo binds to hypophosphorylated teashirt to modulate wingless signalling in Drosophila. EMBO J. 18, 2208–2217. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.8.2208
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. ↵
    1. Gebelein B.,
    2. McKay D. J.,
    3. Mann R. S.
    (2004). Direct integration of Hox and segmentation gene inputs during Drosophila development. Nature 431, 653–659. doi:10.1038/nature02946
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Gehring W. J.,
    2. Qian Y. Q.,
    3. Billeter M.,
    4. Furukubo–Tokunaga K.,
    5. Schier A. F.,
    6. Resendez–Perez D.,
    7. Affolter M.,
    8. Otting G.,
    9. Wüthrich K.
    (1994). Homeodomain-DNA recognition. Cell 78, 211–223. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90292-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. González–Crespo S.,
    2. Morata G.
    (1995). Control of Drosophila adult pattern by extradenticle. Development 121, 2117–2125.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  27. ↵
    1. González–Reyes A.,
    2. Morata G.
    (1990). The developmental effect of overexpressing a Ubx product in Drosophila embryos is dependent on its interactions with other homeotic products. Cell 61, 515–522. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90533-K
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Gyurkovics H.,
    2. Gausz J.,
    3. Kummer J.,
    4. Karch F.
    (1990). A new homeotic mutation in the Drosophila bithorax complex removes a boundary separating two domains of regulation. EMBO J. 9, 2579–2585.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Herke S. W.,
    2. Serio N. V.,
    3. Rogers B. T.
    (2005). Functional analyses of tiptop and Antennapedia in the embryonic development of Oncopeltus fasciatus suggests an evolutionary pathway from ground state to insect legs. Development 132, 27–34. doi:10.1242/dev.01561
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Hittinger C. T.,
    2. Stern D. L.,
    3. Carroll S. B.
    (2005). Pleiotropic functions of a conserved insect-specific Hox peptide motif. Development 132, 5261–5270. doi:10.1242/dev.02146
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Hoey T.,
    2. Levine M.
    (1988). Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila. Nature 332, 858–861. doi:10.1038/332858a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Jeong S.,
    2. Rokas A.,
    3. Carroll S. B.
    (2006). Regulation of body pigmentation by the Abdominal-B Hox protein and its gain and loss in Drosophila evolution. Cell 125, 1387–1399. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Karch F.,
    2. Weiffenbach B.,
    3. Peifer M.,
    4. Bender W.,
    5. Duncan I.,
    6. Celniker S.,
    7. Crosby M.,
    8. Lewis E. B.
    (1985). The abdominal region of the bithorax complex. Cell 43, 81–96. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(85)90014-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Karch F.,
    2. Bender W.,
    3. Weiffenbach B.
    (1990). abdA expression in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 4, 1573–1587. doi:10.1101/gad.4.9.1573
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Kellerman K. A.,
    2. Mattson D. M.,
    3. Duncan I.
    (1990). Mutations affecting the stability of the fushi tarazu protein of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 4, 1936–1950. doi:10.1101/gad.4.11.1936
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Kopp A.,
    2. Duncan I.
    (2002). Anteroposterior patterning in adult abdominal segments of Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 242, 15–30. doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0529
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Kopp A.,
    2. Muskavitch M. A.,
    3. Duncan I.
    (1997). The roles of hedgehog and engrailed in patterning adult abdominal segments of Drosophila. Development 124, 3703–3714.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  38. ↵
    1. Kopp A.,
    2. Duncan I.,
    3. Godt D.,
    4. Carroll S. B.
    (2000). Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosophila. Nature 408, 553–559. doi:10.1038/35046017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Kurant E.,
    2. Pai C. Y.,
    3. Sharf R.,
    4. Halachmi N.,
    5. Sun Y. H.,
    6. Salzberg A.
    (1998). Dorsotonals/homothorax, the Drosophila homologue of meis1, interacts with extradenticle in patterning of the embryonic PNS. Development 125, 1037–1048.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  40. ↵
    1. Laugier E.,
    2. Yang Z.,
    3. Fasano L.,
    4. Kerridge S.,
    5. Vola C.
    (2005). A critical role of teashirt for patterning the ventral epidermis is masked by ectopic expression of tiptop, a paralog of teashirt in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 283, 446–458. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Lewis E. B.
    (1978). A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276, 565–570. doi:10.1038/276565a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Madhavan M. M.,
    2. Madhavan K.
    (1980). Morphogenesis of the epidermis of adult abdomen of Drosophila. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 60, 1–31.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Mann R. S.,
    2. Chan S. K.
    (1996). Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. Trends Genet. 12, 258–262. doi:10.1016/0168-9525(96)10026-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Mann R. S.,
    2. Lelli K. M.,
    3. Joshi R.
    (2009). Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 88, 63–101. doi:10.1016/S0070-2153(09)88003-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. McGinnis W.,
    2. Krumlauf R.
    (1992). Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68, 283–302. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-N
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Neumann C. J.,
    2. Cohen S. M.
    (1996). Distinct mitogenic and cell fate specification functions of wingless in different regions of the wing. Development 122, 1781–1789.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  47. ↵
    1. Ng M.,
    2. Diaz–Benjumea F. J.,
    3. Vincent J. P.,
    4. Wu J.,
    5. Cohen S. M.
    (1996). Specification of the wing by localized expression of wingless protein. Nature 381, 316–318. doi:10.1038/381316a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Ni J.–Q.,
    2. Zhou R.,
    3. Czech B.,
    4. Liu L.–P.,
    5. Holderbaum L.,
    6. Yang–Zhou D.,
    7. Shim H.–S.,
    8. Tao R.,
    9. Handler D.,
    10. Karpowicz P.
    et al. (2011). A genome-scale shRNA resource for transgenic RNAi in Drosophila. Nat. Methods 8, 405–407. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1592
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Ninov N.,
    2. Chiarelli D. A.,
    3. Martín–Blanco E.
    (2007). Extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms directing epithelial cell sheet replacement during Drosophila metamorphosis. Development 134, 367–379. doi:10.1242/dev.02728
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Ninov N.,
    2. Manjón C.,
    3. Martín–Blanco E.
    (2009). Dynamic control of cell cycle and growth coupling by ecdysone, EGFR, and PI3K signaling in Drosophila histoblasts. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000079. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000079
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Pan D.,
    2. Rubin G. M.
    (1998). Targeted expression of teashirt induces ectopic eyes in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 15508–15512. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.26.15508
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Papadopoulos D. K.,
    2. Skouloudaki K.,
    3. Adachi Y.,
    4. Samakovlis C.,
    5. Gehring W. J.
    (2012). Dimer formation via the homeodomain is required for function and specificity of Sex combs reduced in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 367, 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.04.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Rauskolb C.,
    2. Smith K. M.,
    3. Peifer M.,
    4. Wieschaus E.
    (1995). extradenticle determines segmental identities throughout Drosophila development. Development 121, 3663–3673.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  54. ↵
    1. Rideout E. J.,
    2. Dornan A. J.,
    3. Neville M. C.,
    4. Eadie S.,
    5. Goodwin S. F.
    (2010). Control of sexual differentiation and behavior by the doublesex gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 458–466. doi:10.1038/nn.2515
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Rieckhof G. E.,
    2. Casares F.,
    3. Ryoo H. D.,
    4. Abu–Shaar M.,
    5. Mann R. S.
    (1997). Nuclear translocation of extradenticle requires homothorax, which encodes an extradenticle-related homeodomain protein. Cell 91, 171–183. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80400-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    1. Robertson L. K.,
    2. Bowling D. B.,
    3. Mahaffey J. P.,
    4. Imiolczyk B.,
    5. Mahaffey J. W.
    (2004). An interactive network of zinc-finger proteins contributes to regionalization of the Drosophila embryo and establishes the domains of HOM-C protein function. Development 131, 2781–2789. doi:10.1242/dev.01159
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Röder L.,
    2. Vola C.,
    3. Kerridge S.
    (1992). The role of the teashirt gene in trunk segmental identity in Drosophila. Development 115, 1017–1033.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  58. ↵
    1. Ryoo H. D.,
    2. Mann R. S.
    (1999). The control of trunk Hox specificity and activity by Extradenticle. Genes Dev. 13, 1704–1716. doi:10.1101/gad.13.13.1704
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Ryoo H. D.,
    2. Marty T.,
    3. Casares F.,
    4. Affolter M.,
    5. Mann R. S.
    (1999). Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound Homothorax/Hox/Extradenticle complex. Development 126, 5137–5148.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  60. ↵
    1. Sánchez–Herrero E.,
    2. Vernós I.,
    3. Marco R.,
    4. Morata G.
    (1985). Genetic organization of Drosophila bithorax complex. Nature 313, 108–113. doi:10.1038/313108a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Shippy T. D.,
    2. Tomoyasu Y.,
    3. Nie W.,
    4. Brown S. J.,
    5. Denell R. E.
    (2008). Do teashirt family genes specify trunk identity? Insights from the single tiptop/teashirt homolog of Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Genes Evol. 218, 141–152. doi:10.1007/s00427-008-0212-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Singh A.,
    2. Kango–Singh M.,
    3. Sun Y. H.
    (2002). Eye suppression, a novel function of teashirt, requires Wingless signaling. Development 129, 4271–4280.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Singh A.,
    2. Kango–Singh M.,
    3. Choi K.–W.,
    4. Sun Y. H.
    (2004). Dorso-ventral asymmetric functions of teashirt in Drosophila eye development depend on spatial cues provided by early DV patterning genes. Mech. Dev. 121, 365–370. doi:10.1016/j.mod.2004.02.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Soanes K. H.,
    2. MacKay J. O.,
    3. Coré N.,
    4. Heslip T.,
    5. Kerridge S.,
    6. Bell J. B.
    (2001). Identification of a regulatory allele of teashirt (tsh) in Drosophila melanogaster that affects wing hinge development. An adult-specific tsh enhancer in Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 105, 145–151. doi:10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00397-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Taghli–Lamallem O.,
    2. Gallet A.,
    3. Leroy F.,
    4. Malapert P.,
    5. Vola C.,
    6. Kerridge S.,
    7. Fasano L.
    (2007). Direct interaction between Teashirt and Sex combs reduced proteins, via Tsh's acidic domain, is essential for specifying the identity of the prothorax in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 307, 142–151. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.04.028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Yoder J. H.
    (2011). Drosophila pupal abdomen immunohistochemistry. J. Vis. Exp. 56, e3139. doi:10.3791/3139
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Yoder J. H.
    (2012). Hox-mediated regulation of doublesex sculpts sex-specific abdomen morphology in Drosophila. Dev. Dyn. 241, 1076–1090. doi:10.1002/dvdy.23791
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Kidd B. J.,
    3. Carroll S. B.,
    4. Yoder J. H.
    (2011). Sexually dimorphic regulation of the Wingless morphogen controls sex-specific segment number in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11139–11144. doi:10.1073/pnas.1108431108
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. White R. A.,
    2. Wilcox M.
    (1984). Protein products of the bithorax complex in Drosophila. Cell 39, 163–171. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90202-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. ↵
    1. Williams T. M.,
    2. Selegue J. E.,
    3. Werner T.,
    4. Gompel N.,
    5. Kopp A.,
    6. Carroll S. B.
    (2008). The regulation and evolution of a genetic switch controlling sexually dimorphic traits in Drosophila. Cell 134, 610–623. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    1. Wu J.,
    2. Cohen S. M.
    (1999). Proximodistal axis formation in the Drosophila leg: subdivision into proximal and distal domains by Homothorax and Distal-less. Development 126, 109–117.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  72. ↵
    1. Wu J.,
    2. Cohen S. M.
    (2000). Proximal distal axis formation in the Drosophila leg: distinct functions of teashirt and homothorax in the proximal leg. Mech. Dev. 94, 47–56. doi:10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00311-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Wu J.,
    2. Cohen S. M.
    (2002). Repression of Teashirt marks the initiation of wing development. Development 129, 2411–2418.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    1. Zirin J. D.,
    2. Mann R. S.
    (2004). Differing strategies for the establishment and maintenance of teashirt and homothorax repression in the Drosophila wing. Development 131, 5683–5693. doi:10.1242/dev.01450
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

RSSRSS

Keywords

 Download PDF

Email
Research Article
Homeotic functions of the Teashirt transcription factor during adult Drosophila development
Wei Wang, Neil Tindell, Shun Yan, John H. Yoder
Biology Open 2013 2: 18-29; doi: 10.1242/bio.20122915
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article Navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Biology Open and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.

News from Biology Open in 2020

A photo of the Editors

Managing Editor Rachel Hackett summarises the recent BiO Editor meeting, discussing peer review, new Meeting Reviews and how BiO is responding to challenges in the ever-evolving publishing ecosystem.

New interactive timeline for landmark COVID-19 preprints

A screenshot of the timline

In three months, over 1,000 coronavirus preprints have been posted. A group of preLighters has now created a new website to feature landmark studies and place them on a timeline of the pandemic.

Interviews – David and Jie

Photos of David and Jie

BiO first authors David Pirovich and Jie Sun discuss their journeys into science, the implications of their research and what’s coming up next in their careers.