Advertisement
Research Article
Cenp-meta is required for sustained spindle checkpoint
Thomas Rubin, Roger E. Karess, Zohra Rahmani
Biology Open 2014 3: 522-528; doi: 10.1242/bio.20148490

ABSTRACT

Cenp-E is a kinesin-like motor protein required for efficient end-on attachment of kinetochores to the spindle microtubules. Cenp-E immunodepletion in Xenopus mitotic extracts results in the loss of mitotic arrest and massive chromosome missegregation, whereas its depletion in mammalian cells leads to chromosome segregation defects despite the presence of a functional spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). Cenp-meta has previously been reported to be the Drosophila homolog of vertebrate Cenp-E. In this study, we show that cenp-metaΔ mutant neuroblasts arrest in mitosis when treated with colchicine. cenp-metaΔ mutant cells display a mitotic delay. Yet, despite the persistence of the two checkpoint proteins Mad2 and BubR1 on unattached kinetochores, these cells eventually enter anaphase and give rise to highly aneuploid daughter cells. Indeed, we find that cenp-metaΔ mutant cells display a slow but continuous degradation of cyclin B, which eventually triggers the mitotic exit observed. Thus, our data provide evidence for a role of Cenp-meta in sustaining the SAC response.

INTRODUCTION

During normal mitosis, faithful chromosome segregation is assured by the robustness of kinetochore attachment to the spindle microtubules (K–MT attachments) and the surveillance mechanism called the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which delays mitotic progression if incorrect K–MT attachments are detected, giving the cell time to correct them. The SAC functions to regulate temporally the activity of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), a ubiquitin ligase (Harper et al., 2002; Peters, 2002; Yu, 2002). By targeting Cyclin B and Securin for degradation by the proteasome, APC/C drives the cell to mitotic exit. Early in mitosis, several checkpoint proteins (including Mad1, Mad2, Bub1, BubR1, Bub3 and Mps1) bind to unattached or inappropriately attached kinetochores. This recruitment to the kinetochore generates a ‘stop anaphase’ signal that diffuses into the cytosol. This signal is composed of the checkpoint proteins Mad2, BubR1 and Bub3 bound to Cdc20, a key co-factor of the APC/C necessary for its activation (Musacchio and Salmon, 2007; Santaguida and Musacchio, 2009). Following correct attachment of all chromosomes to the spindle, the checkpoint is inactivated and Cdc20 is freed to activate the APC/C (Yu, 2002). Several additional factors have been shown to participate in mitotic checkpoint signalling in metazoans. These factors include the RZZ complex (Karess, 2005) and the protein CENP-E (Mao et al., 2003; Mao et al., 2005; Weaver et al., 2003).

Cenp-E is a plus-end directed molecular motor kinesin localized specifically to kinetochores during mitosis (Yen et al., 1991; Yen et al., 1992). Several studies have demonstrated that Cenp-E is required for efficient capture and attachment of microtubules to kinetochores (Lombillo et al., 1995; Wood et al., 1997; Yao et al., 1997; McEwen et al., 2001; Putkey et al., 2002; Kapoor et al., 2006). In mammals, Cenp-E has been shown to be required for chromosome congression to the spindle equator and for stable kinetochore–microtubule attachment. Depletion of Cenp-E by antisense oligonucleotides (Yao et al., 2000) or RNA interference (Tanudji et al., 2004) and inhibition of CENP-E recruitment to kinetochores by antibody microinjection (Schaar et al., 1997; McEwen et al., 2001) in human cells all lead to problems in chromosome congression. In primary mouse fibroblasts, CENP-E depletion results in chromosome segregation defects with a few chromosomes clustered around the spindle poles (Putkey et al., 2002). Similarly, depletion of Cenp-E by siRNA in HeLa cells causes chromosome missegregation with the presence of mono-oriented chromosomes localized close to the spindle pole (Tanudji et al., 2004). More recently, Cenp-E was shown to be phosphorylated in vitro and in vivo by both Aurora kinases A and B at a conserved site close to the CENP-E kinesin neck domain (Kim et al., 2010). This phosphorylation leads to reduced affinity for microtubules in vitro whereas preventing its phosphorylation leads to chromosome alignment defects, thereby demonstrating that Aurora kinases control Cenp-E mediated promotion of chromosome biorientation (Kim et al., 2010). Overall these combined observations indicate that CENP-E stabilizes K–MT attachment and promotes chromosome movement toward the metaphase plate.

Although it is now well established that CENP-E has a role in efficient K–MT capture and chromosome congression, its implication in the signaling cascade of the mitotic checkpoint is more controversial. Inhibition of CENP-E expression in mammalian cells, by antisense oligonucleotides or by RNAi, leads to prolonged mitotic arrest (Yao et al., 2000; Tanudji et al., 2004). On the other hand, depletion of CENP-E in primary mouse fibroblasts does not result in long-term mitotic arrest (Putkey et al., 2002). Similarly, in Xenopus, immunodepletion of Cenp-E from Xenopus extracts results in loss of mitotic arrest in the presence of microtubule-depolymerizing agents (Abrieu et al., 2000). Moreover, CENP-E and BubR1 can form a stoichiometric complex, and the presence of CENP-E can greatly enhance the kinase activity of BubR1 toward itself or an exogenous substrate such as histone H1 (Mao et al., 2003; Weaver et al., 2003; Guo et al., 2012). These observations suggest that the loss of mitotic arrest observed in Xenopus egg extracts depleted of CENP-E is caused by a reduction of BubR1 kinase activity.

In Drosophila, Cenp-meta and Cenp-ana were previously reported to be closely related to Cenp-E (Yucel et al., 2000). While a cenp-ana mutation leads to an increased frequency of anaphase, a cenp-meta mutation leads to an elevated prometaphase frequency (Yucel et al., 2000), reflecting a role in promoting chromosome congression, an observation confirmed by others (Williams et al., 2003; Maia et al., 2007). Moreover, co-depletion of cenp-ana and cenp-meta in Drosophila S2 cells by RNAi yield to a phenotype and a mitotic index identical to the single RNAi depletion of cenp-meta (Goshima and Vale, 2003) strongly suggesting that Cenp-meta is likely to be the Drosophila homolog of vertebrate Cenp-E. Zygotic deletion of Cenp-meta, is lethal at the pupal stage. Homozygous mutants of cenp-meta show an elevated mitotic index, with retarded congression of chromosomes to the metaphase plate (Yucel et al., 2000). Such a phenotype suggests that the checkpoint is functional and activated in these mutants, delaying anaphase onset since the chromosomes are not properly bioriented. Paradoxically, cenp-metaΔ mutants display a very high level of aneuploid cells (Yucel et al., 2000; Williams et al., 2003). This apparent discrepancy has not been further addressed until the present study. Here, we show that Cenp-meta is required for prolonged mitotic checkpoint maintenance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genetic stocks

The strain containing the null allele mutation cenp-metaΔ has already been described previously. Briefly, imprecise excision of the P element deleted ∼5 kb of Cenp-meta genomic DNA just upstream of the 5′ end of the initial P element insertion site (Yucel et al., 2000). Flies expressing GFP-Rod, RFP-Rod, the mutations mad2P and asp, RFP-BubR1, GFP-Mad2, Spc25-mRFP1 transgene were described previously (Buffin et al., 2005; Buffin et al., 2007; Schittenhelm et al., 2007; Rahmani et al., 2009). GFP-cyclin B flies were a gift from J. Raff (Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Cambridge, England, UK).

Western blot

Protein extracts from 5 brains of wild-type and cenp-metaΔ homozygous third instar larvae were loaded onto SDS 8%-acrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Protran BA 85; Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany) using a BioRad electrophoretic blotting device. Membranes were blocked for 1 hour in TBST (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) with 5% dry milk and incubated 1 hour 30 minutes at room temperature with rabbit anti-Drosophila Cenp-meta (a gift from M. L. Goldberg, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) diluted 1:6000 in TBST plus 1% milk. After washing in TBST, the blot was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with secondary antibody of goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish-peroxidase (Promega, Charbonnières, France) diluted 1:5000. Immunodetection was carried out with the SuperSignal Kit (Perbio Science France, Brebières, France).

Cytology

Third instar larval brains were fixed and stained in aceto-orcein as previously described (Rahmani et al., 2009). The mitotic index (mean number of mitotic cells per microscopic field) in response to colchicine-induced depolymerization of microtubules was determined by preincubating brains in 10−4 M colchicine in 0.7% NaCl for 0, 30, or 60 minutes and then transferring them to 0.5% Na citrate hypotonic solution for 4 minutes before staining. Aneuploidy was determined by preincubating the brains in 10−4 M colchicine in 0.7% NaCl for 7 minutes to obtain a readable karyotype, then transferred to 0.5% Na citrate hypotonic solution for 4 minutes before being fixed and stained. Cells were observed with a microscope (Microphot; Nikon) and a 63× NA 1.4 phase contrast objective (Carl Zeiss, Inc.). A cell was reported as aneuploid if it clearly showed at least one extra chromosome.

In vivo imaging

In vivo imaging of living neuroblasts of third instar larval brains were carried out as described previously (Rahmani et al., 2009). Brains were imaged in a temperature-controlled room set at 21°C with a spinning disk confocal head (Ultraview; PerkinElmer) mounted on an inverted microscope (DMI6000; Leica) with a Zeiss 100× NA 1.4 lens and a camera (QuantEM 512SC; Photometrics), all piloted by MetaMorph 7 (MDS Analytical Technologies). At 20-seconds intervals, a z series of images consisting of seven 1-µm steps was acquired with 1× binning. Confocal video frames are maximum intensity projections. Time-lapse image series were converted into videos with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health), and still images were processed using Photoshop (Adobe). NEB was defined as when the RFP-Spc25 or RFP- or GFP-Rod signal began to be visible on kinetochores. Anaphase onset was defined as the moment sister kinetochores (marked with either Spc25 or Rod) began to separate. GFP-cyclin B degradation dynamics was measured as described previously (Rahmani et al., 2009). Briefly, neuroblasts expressing one copy of GFP-cyclin B and RFP-Rod were filmed as above. GFP fluorescence in each z section was quantified for the whole cell and for a central region containing the kinetochores and most of the spindle. This gave a more robust measurement of the OCBD because spindle-associated cyclin B is the first to be degraded during metaphase (Buffin et al., 2007). The signal was adjusted for background and for bleaching relative to the signal of a neighboring non-mitotic cell (assumed to be constant). In the graphs for Fig. 4, the signal levels for the whole cell are displayed as normalized signal relative to the maximal intensity measured for the cell.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± s.d. The P-values were calculated using Student's t-test. Values were considered statistically different whenever P<0.05.

RESULTS

cenp-metaΔ mutant cells are checkpoint competent

Previous studies have shown that Cenp-E depletion leads to either a mitotic arrest in mammalian cells or a loss of mitotic arrest in Xenopus egg extracts. In order to address these apparent conflicting observations, we looked at the mitotic index in cenp-metaΔ mutant larval neuroblasts. The cenp-metaΔ allele is homozygous lethal at the larval stage (for further information on the nature of the cenp-metaΔ mutation, see Materials and Methods and Fig. 1A). No Cenp-meta protein was detected by western blot of cenp-metaΔ mutant protein extracts (Fig. 1B). Karyotypic analysis after staining chromosomes with aceto-orcein revealed a high level of aneuploidy, around 7% (Table 1; supplementary material Fig. S1). The functionality of the checkpoint in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells was tested by first looking if there was a mitotic arrest in the presence of colchicine, a microtubule depolymerizing agent. cenp-metaΔ mutant neuroblasts accumulated in M phase after 1 hour colchicine treatment, as the mitotic index increased by 2.46-fold, comparable to the 3-fold increase observed in wild type. Therefore, the checkpoint appeared to be functional in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells. To further confirm this, we generated a cenp-metaΔ mad2P double mutant and looked at the mitotic index in the presence of colchicine. mad2P is a null mutation that affects the spindle checkpoint but the cells display very little aneuploidy (Buffin et al., 2007). We found that the cenp-metaΔ mad2P double mutant flies were larval/pupal lethals, that the mitotic index no longer increased after treating the cells with colchicine (Table 1), and that the percentage of aneuploid cells was even higher than that observed in cenp-metaΔ single mutant (33.6% vs 6.7%). Therefore, these observations indicate that the spindle checkpoint appears to be functional in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells since removing the spindle checkpoint by removing Mad2 results in an even higher level of aneuploidy and lower mitotic index.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. The cenp-metaΔ gene and gene product.

(A) The Cenp-meta gene locus contains 11 exons and shares 55 nucleotides of 3′ untranslated region (utr) with the 3′ utr of the abrupt gene, which is transcribed in the opposite direction. Exon structure, direction of transcription (arrows), site of P-element insertion, and extent of the 5 Kb deletion in cenp-metaΔ mutation are indicated. (B) Western with Cenp-meta antibody shows one band above 250 kD in wild-type third instar larval brain protein extracts (WT) not found in larval brain protein extracts from cenp-metaΔ homozygous mutant (cenp-metaΔ). This band is consistent with the previously reported predicted size of Cenp-meta protein, which is 257 kD (Yucel et al., 2000). The same blot was stripped and reprobed with tubulin antibody to verify that equal amount of protein extracts were loaded for each lane. Asterisk indicates non-specific bands present in WT and cenp-metaΔ protein extracts.

View this table:
Table 1. Analysis of the mitotic parameters in WT and cenp-meta mutant neuroblasts

To further dissect the phenotype observed in the cenp-metaΔ single mutant, we analysed living cenp-metaΔ neuroblasts by time-lapse microscopy to determine the mitotic timing (i.e. the time that elapses between Nuclear Envelope Breakdown (NEB) and anaphase onset). For this, Spc25, a kinetochore protein that is part of the Ndc80 complex, tagged with the RFP fluorophore was expressed in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells to monitor the kinetochores. Whereas wild-type (wt) neuroblasts spent an average of 9.6±1.6 minutes (Fig. 2A,B; supplementary material Movie 1) between the NEB and the anaphase onset, cenp-metaΔ mutant neuroblasts showed a prolonged prometaphase with an average of 15.1±5.6 minutes (P<0.0001) (Fig. 2A,C; supplementary material Movie 2). We have shown previously that in mad2 mutant cells, in which the spindle checkpoint is abolished, the average mitotic timing was accelerated (7.3 minutes) compared to wt cells (Buffin et al., 2007; Rahmani et al., 2009). To test if the spindle checkpoint was functional in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells, we measured the mitotic timing in cenp-metaΔ mad2 double mutant cells and found that it was similarly accelerated (7.2±1.9 minutes, P<0.0001) (Fig. 2A,D; supplementary material Movie 3), thereby suggesting again that the spindle checkpoint is functioning in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Mitotic timing in cenp-metaΔ mutant and cenp-metaΔ mad2 double mutant neuroblasts.

(A) Comparative mitotic timing of cenp-metaΔ and cenp-metaΔ mad2 double mutant cells. NEB is defined as when RFP-Spc25 begins to be visible on kinetochores. cenp-metaΔ (blue diamonds) are delayed, with an average 15.1 minutes vs 9.6 minutes in WT (yellow diamonds). cenp-metaΔ mad2 (pink diamonds) enter anaphase earlier than WT cells (7.2 minutes vs 9.6 minutes, P<0.005). cenp-metaΔ mad2 double mutant cells (pink diamonds) show the same timing as the one that was previously reported for mad2 alone (Buffin et al., 2007; Rahmani et al., 2009), thereby indicating that the prometaphase delay in cenp-metaΔ is SAC-dependent. (B–D) Still frames extracted from typical movies used for the determination of mitotic timing (from NEB to anaphase). (B) WT, (C) cenp-metaΔ, (D) cenp-metaΔ mad2 double mutant. All cells are marked with RFP-Spc25. See also supplementary material Movies 1, 2, 3. Scale bars: 5 µm.

Paradoxically, despite the fact that the cells have an active checkpoint, the level of aneuploidy was very high in cenp-metaΔ single mutant cells (6.7% vs 0.2% in wt, Table 1). Moreover, the mutant cells treated with colchicine for 30 minutes or 60 minutes also displayed a high percentage of Premature Sister Chromatid Separation (PSCS) around 4.3% and 6.8%, respectively (Table 1; supplementary material Fig. S1). PSCS is generally considered a sign of mitotic exit and spindle checkpoint dysfunction.

To further explore this apparent weakness in the SAC function of cenp-metaΔ, we generated a double mutant of cenp-metaΔ and a null allele of abnormal spindle (asp). The asp mutation, which perturbs spindle assembly, normally causes cells to arrest for hours in mitosis (Ripoll et al., 1985) in a SAC-dependent manner (Basto et al., 2000; Buffin et al., 2007), and results in a very high mitotic index. We found that the mitotic index was significantly reduced in the cenp-metaΔ asp double mutant (3.5 vs 7.4 for asp alone, Table 1). This result confirms that the SAC is not as robust as in asp mutant cells. Therefore, the high level of aneuploid cells observed in cenp-metaΔ cells may be due to an overall reduction (but not elimination) of the SAC intensity or duration caused by the cenp-metaΔ mutation.

The signal for the checkpoint proteins Mad2 and BubR1 persists on unaligned kinetochores present in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells

The possibility that the mitotic checkpoint may not be maintained in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells may be due to a reduced recruitment level of Mad2 and/or BubR1. In order to examine this, we looked at the dynamic behavior of these two checkpoint proteins during mitosis. For this, GFP-tagged Mad2 was expressed in wt or cenp-metaΔ mutant cells. As reported previously in wild-type neuroblasts, GFP-Mad2 was recruited to kinetochores of cenp-metaΔ mutant cells right at NEB (Buffin et al., 2005) and started very quickly to stream continuously toward the spindle poles during prometaphase. By the time, the cell reached anaphase, Mad2 signal was not visible anymore (Fig. 3A; supplementary material Movie 4). However, in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells, while the streaming of Mad2 appeared to be normal, Mad2 signal could still be detected on kinetochores of polar chromosomes by the time mutant cells underwent anaphase, and this signal lasted until late anaphase (Fig. 3B,C; supplementary material Movies 5, 6). The persistence of Mad2 on the unattached polar kinetochores is consistent with an active SAC in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The checkpoint proteins Mad2 and BubR1 remain associated with the kinetochores of unaligned chromosomes in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells entering anaphase.

(A–C) Selected frames from a WT (A) or two different cenp-metaΔ mutant cells (B,C) marked with GFP-Mad2 showing three mitotic stages (Prometaphase, Anaphase, Late anaphase). See the corresponding supplementary material Movies 4, 5, 6. Mad2 streaming during prometaphase is not affected in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells (B,C). While Mad2 signal is totally gone by the time the WT cell enters anaphase (A), it is still visible on kinetochores (arrowhead) of unaligned chromosomes at the poles and lasts until late anaphase in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells (B,C). (D–F) Selected frames from a WT (D) or two different cenp-metaΔ mutant cells (E,F) marked with GFP-Rod (green) and RFP-BubR1 (red). Note that GFP-Rod is used to monitor the anaphase onset since BubR1 signals are gone at this stage. BubR1 signal is no longer visible at metaphase (Met) in the WT cell (D) whereas it persists on unaligned kinetochores (arrowhead) seen in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells (E,F) entering anaphase (Ana). See also supplementary material Movies 7, 8, 9. Scale bars: 5 µm.

We similarly examined RFP-BubR1 in wt and cenp-metaΔ mutant cells. BubR1 signal at metaphase kinetochores was totally undetectable in wt cells (Fig. 3D; supplementary material Movie 7). However, strong BubR1 signals were detected on unaligned kinetochores observed in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells and stayed visible until late anaphase (Fig. 3E,F; supplementary material Movies 8, 9). Based on these observations, it appears that anaphase onset can still occur in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells even if Mad2 and BubR1 are still retained on unattached or misaligned kinetochores.

Cyclin B is continuously degraded in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells

The level of inhibitory signal generated by Mad2 and BubR1 on unattached kinetochores observed in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells may not be high enough over time to efficiently suppress APC/C activation and consequently APC/C-mediated degradation of mitotic substrates such as cyclin B that leads to inactivation of Cdk1 activity and mitotic exit. Thus, measurement of cyclin B degradation during mitosis in wt and cenp-metaΔ mutant cells was used as an in vivo readout of APC/C activation. In agreement with what we showed previously (Buffin et al., 2007; Rahmani et al., 2009), the onset on cyclin B degradation (OCBD) in wt Drosophila neuroblasts expressing GFP-tagged cyclin B started between 4 to 7 minutes after NEB and the timing between OCBD and anaphase onset was relatively constant with an average of 2.9±0.6 minutes (Fig. 4A,C; supplementary material Movie 10). However, in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells, the levels of cyclin B declined gradually but constantly until the cell entered anaphase (Fig. 4B,C; supplementary material Movie 11). This result suggests that in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells, the functional SAC cannot effectively block APC/C mediated cyclin B degradation. Consequently, the continuous degradation of cyclin B mediated by the activated APC/C could eventually reach a threshold for which mitotic arrest could no longer be maintained.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Cyclin B degradation profiles in WT and cenp-metaΔ mutant neuroblasts.

Typical onset of cyclin B degradation (OCBD) in a single neuroblast. (A) WT, (B) cenp-metaΔ mutant neuroblast. (A,B) The frames showing RFP-Rod (red) and GFP-cyclin B (green) at various time points (indicated as a,b,c, on both graphs) in WT (A) and cenp-metaΔ mutant (B) cells were taken from supplementary material Movies 10 and 11, respectively. (C) Mean time of OCBD versus anaphase (ANA) onset. OCBD begins 2.9 minutes before anaphase onset in WT cells (see also Rahmani et al., 2009) whereas it is a slow continuous process in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells. See also supplementary material Movies 10, 11. Scale bars: 5 µm.

DISCUSSION

Here we have provided several lines of evidence that Cenp-meta is required for long-term maintenance of the spindle checkpoint. First, while cenp-metaΔ mutant cells arrested in mitosis when treated with colchicine (as reflected by the increased number of mitotic cells seen in cenp-metaΔ mutant treated cells), the relatively high level of cells with PSCS revealed that these cells were not able to maintain a prolonged arrest when treated with spindle poisons. Second, the high mitotic index caused by the asp mutation is strongly reduced when combined with cenp-metaΔ mutation, thereby suggesting that somehow Cenp-meta helps to maintain the SAC intensity or duration. Third, the persistence of the checkpoint components BubR1 and Mad2 on kinetochores of unaligned chromosomes did not preclude cenp-metaΔ mutant cells from entering anaphase. Fourth, in WT cells, cyclin B levels start to decline rapidly around 2–3 minutes before anaphase onset, whereas, in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells, cyclin B degradation is a slow but continuous process.

Two very recent reports showed that the strength of the SAC response is graded and depends not only on the number of unattached kinetochores but also on the kinetochore levels of Mad2 (Collin et al., 2013; Dick and Gerlich, 2013). Although this may contribute to explain why untreated cenp-metaΔ mutant cells, with only a few mono-oriented kinetochores, may still enter anaphase and produce aneuploid cells, it does not adequately explain some other aspects of the cenp-metaΔ phenotype. Indeed, in colchicine-treated cells, despite the fact that all kinetochores are unattached and so generate a SAC signal, the SAC appears to be less robust in the cenp-metaΔ mutant than in the wt as revealed by the observation of a high percentage of cenp-metaΔ mutant cells with PSCS. Moreover, the reduction of the high mitotic index observed in the cenp-metaΔ asp double mutant provides compelling evidence that Cenp-meta itself may contribute to the SAC response. Therefore, an alternate explanation is that cenp-metaΔ may attenuate SAC signal directly by interfering with its production or its maintenance. Cenp-meta may possibly influence BubR1 kinase activity. In Xenopus mitotic egg extracts and primary mouse fibroblasts, Cenp-E was shown to form a ternary complex that was necessary for the activation of BubR1 kinase activity (Abrieu et al., 2000; Mao et al., 2003; Mao et al., 2005; Weaver et al., 2003). More recently, Guo et al. demonstrated that kinetochore-associated BubR1 phosphorylates itself on T608 in human cells in vivo and that this phosphorylation is dependent on kinetochore-associated Cenp-E (Guo et al., 2012). However, Suijkerbuijk et al. reported that most vertebrate BubR1 (but not Drosophila BubR1) was more likely to be a pseudokinase with no catalytic activity and that the pseudokinase domain was important for BubR1 protein stability (Suijkerbuijk et al., 2012). Thus, whether vertebrate BubR1 possesses real kinase activity still remains a controversial issue. However, the three catalytic residues essential for a conventional kinase are retained in Drosophila BubR1 domain (Suijkerbuijk et al., 2012), and suggest that Drosophila BubR1 may potentially be catalytically active. If it is the case, the absence of Cenp-meta may affect Drosophila BubR1 potential kinase activity in cenp-metaΔ mutant cells, thereby mimicking a phenotype that resembles the one observed with BubR1-KD (Kinase mutated) expressing cells. We showed previously that the potential kinase activity of BubR1 is dispensable for initiating the spindle checkpoint response in Drosophila larval neuroblasts (Rahmani et al., 2009) but the presence of PSCS in BubR1-KD expressing cells treated with colchicine for 60 minutes suggests that the potential BubR1 kinase activity may be needed for long-term maintenance of metaphase arrest (Rahmani et al., 2009). Interestingly, the percentage of cells with PSCS in cenp-metaΔ mutant is much higher when compared to bubR1-KD mutant (6.8±2 vs 1.4±0.7, Table 1; Rahmani et al., 2009; respectively). This indicates that the percentage of cells that display signs of premature mitotic exit (reflected by the presence of PSCS) after colchicine treatment is greater in the absence of Cenp-meta than in the absence of BubR1 potential kinase activity and suggests that Cenp-meta may also affect the SAC independently of its presumed function in modulating BubR1 potential kinase activity. In conclusion, we have shown that Cenp-meta is important for prolonged SAC-dependent mitotic arrest. Whether Cenp-meta acts through BubR1 potential kinase activity and/or an unknown mechanism remains to be tested.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the IJM Imagery department for help in confocal acquisition and Romain Servouze for technical assistance. We are grateful to Christian Lehner and Jordan Raff for providing fly stocks, and Michael Goldberg for providing the Cenp-meta antibody.

Funding

This work was supported by the CNRS (to R.E.K. and Z.R.), the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer–Comité d'Ile de France (to Z.R.). T.R. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-08-BLAN-0006-01 attributed to R.E.K.].

Footnotes

  • Author Contributions R.E.K. and Z.R. designed the experiments. T.R. and Z.R. performed the majority of experiments and data analysis. Z.R. wrote the paper with suggestions from R.E.K.

  • Competing interests The authors have no competing interests to declare.

  • Received April 8, 2014.
  • Accepted April 28, 2014.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abrieu A.,
    2. Kahana J. A.,
    3. Wood K. W.,
    4. Cleveland D. W.
    (2000). CENP-E as an essential component of the mitotic checkpoint in vitro. Cell 102, 817–826. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00070-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Basto R.,
    2. Gomes R.,
    3. Karess R. E.
    (2000). Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 939–943. doi:10.1038/35046592
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Buffin E.,
    2. Lefebvre C.,
    3. Huang J.,
    4. Gagou M. E.,
    5. Karess R. E.
    (2005). Recruitment of Mad2 to the kinetochore requires the Rod/Zw10 complex. Curr. Biol. 15, 856–861. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Buffin E.,
    2. Emre D.,
    3. Karess R. E.
    (2007). Flies without a spindle checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 565–572. doi:10.1038/ncb1570
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Collin P.,
    2. Nashchekina O.,
    3. Walker R.,
    4. Pines J.
    (2013). The spindle assembly checkpoint works like a rheostat rather than a toggle switch. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1378–1385. doi:10.1038/ncb2855
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Dick A. E.,
    2. Gerlich D. W.
    (2013). Kinetic framework of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1370–1377. doi:10.1038/ncb2842
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Goshima G.,
    2. Vale R. D.
    (2003). The roles of microtubule-based motor proteins in mitosis: comprehensive RNAi analysis in the Drosophila S2 cell line. J. Cell Biol. 162, 1003–1016. doi:10.1083/jcb.200303022
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Guo Y.,
    2. Kim C.,
    3. Ahmad S.,
    4. Zhang J.,
    5. Mao Y.
    (2012). CENP-E-dependent BubR1 autophosphorylation enhances chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 198, 205–217. doi:10.1083/jcb.201202152
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Harper J. W.,
    2. Burton J. L.,
    3. Solomon M. J.
    (2002). The anaphase-promoting complex: it's not just for mitosis any more. Genes Dev. 16, 2179–2206. doi:10.1101/gad.1013102
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Kapoor T. M.,
    2. Lampson M. A.,
    3. Hergert P.,
    4. Cameron L.,
    5. Cimini D.,
    6. Salmon E. D.,
    7. McEwen B. F.,
    8. Khodjakov A.
    (2006). Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 311, 388–391. doi:10.1126/science.1122142
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Karess R.
    (2005). Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 386–392. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2005.05.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Kim Y.,
    2. Holland A. J.,
    3. Lan W.,
    4. Cleveland D. W.
    (2010). Aurora kinases and protein phosphatase 1 mediate chromosome congression through regulation of CENP-E. Cell 142, 444–455. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.039
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Lombillo V. A.,
    2. Nislow C.,
    3. Yen T. J.,
    4. Gelfand V. I.,
    5. McIntosh J. R.
    (1995). Antibodies to the kinesin motor domain and CENP-E inhibit microtubule depolymerization-dependent motion of chromosomes in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 128, 107–115. doi:10.1083/jcb.128.1.107
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Maia A. F.,
    2. Lopes C. S.,
    3. Sunkel C. E.
    (2007). BubR1 and CENP-E have antagonistic effects upon the stability of microtubule–kinetochore attachments in Drosophila S2 cell mitosis. Cell Cycle 6, 1367–1378. doi:10.4161/cc.6.11.4271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Mao Y.,
    2. Abrieu A.,
    3. Cleveland D. W.
    (2003). Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell 114, 87–98. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00475-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Mao Y.,
    2. Desai A.,
    3. Cleveland D. W.
    (2005). Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 170, 873–880. doi:10.1083/jcb.200505040
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. McEwen B. F.,
    2. Chan G. K.,
    3. Zubrowski B.,
    4. Savoian M. S.,
    5. Sauer M. T.,
    6. Yen T. J.
    (2001). CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 2776–2789. doi:10.1091/mbc.12.9.2776
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Musacchio A.,
    2. Salmon E. D.
    (2007). The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379–393. doi:10.1038/nrm2163
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Peters J. M.
    (2002). The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol. Cell 9, 931–943. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00540-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Putkey F. R.,
    2. Cramer T.,
    3. Morphew M. K.,
    4. Silk A. D.,
    5. Johnson R. S.,
    6. McIntosh J. R.,
    7. Cleveland D. W.
    (2002). Unstable kinetochore-microtubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENP-E. Dev. Cell 3, 351–365. doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00255-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Rahmani Z.,
    2. Gagou M. E.,
    3. Lefebvre C.,
    4. Emre D.,
    5. Karess R. E.
    (2009). Separating the spindle, checkpoint, and timer functions of BubR1. J. Cell Biol. 187, 597–605. doi:10.1083/jcb.200905026
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Ripoll P.,
    2. Pimpinelli S.,
    3. Valdivia M. M.,
    4. Avila J.
    (1985). A cell division mutant of Drosophila with a functionally abnormal spindle. Cell 41, 907–912. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80071-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Santaguida S.,
    2. Musacchio A.
    (2009). The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28, 2511–2531. doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.173
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Schaar B. T.,
    2. Chan G. K.,
    3. Maddox P.,
    4. Salmon E. D.,
    5. Yen T. J.
    (1997). CENP-E function at kinetochores is essential for chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol. 139, 1373–1382. doi:10.1083/jcb.139.6.1373
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Schittenhelm R. B.,
    2. Heeger S.,
    3. Althoff F.,
    4. Walter A.,
    5. Heidmann S.,
    6. Mechtler K.,
    7. Lehner C. F.
    (2007). Spatial organization of a ubiquitous eukaryotic kinetochore protein network in Drosophila chromosomes. Chromosoma 116, 385–402. doi:10.1007/s00412-007-0103-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Suijkerbuijk S. J.,
    2. van Dam T. J.,
    3. Karagöz G. E.,
    4. von Castelmur E.,
    5. Hubner N. C.,
    6. Duarte A. M.,
    7. Vleugel M.,
    8. Perrakis A.,
    9. Rüdiger S. G.,
    10. Snel B.
    et al. (2012). The vertebrate mitotic checkpoint protein BUBR1 is an unusual pseudokinase. Dev. Cell 22, 1321–1329. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.03.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Tanudji M.,
    2. Shoemaker J.,
    3. L'Italien L.,
    4. Russell L.,
    5. Chin G.,
    6. Schebye X. M.
    (2004). Gene silencing of CENP-E by small interfering RNA in HeLa cells leads to missegregation of chromosomes after a mitotic delay. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 3771–3781. doi:10.1091/mbc.E03-07-0482
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Weaver B. A.,
    2. Bonday Z. Q.,
    3. Putkey F. R.,
    4. Kops G. J.,
    5. Silk A. D.,
    6. Cleveland D. W.
    (2003). Centromere-associated protein-E is essential for the mammalian mitotic checkpoint to prevent aneuploidy due to single chromosome loss. J. Cell Biol. 162, 551–563. doi:10.1083/jcb.200303167
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Williams B. C.,
    2. Li Z.,
    3. Liu S.,
    4. Williams E. V.,
    5. Leung G.,
    6. Yen T. J.,
    7. Goldberg M. L.
    (2003). Zwilch, a new component of the ZW10/ROD complex required for kinetochore functions. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 1379–1391. doi:10.1091/mbc.E02-09-0624
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Wood K. W.,
    2. Sakowicz R.,
    3. Goldstein L. S.,
    4. Cleveland D. W.
    (1997). CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell 91, 357–366. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80419-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Yao X.,
    2. Anderson K. L.,
    3. Cleveland D. W.
    (1997). The microtubule-dependent motor centromere-associated protein E (CENP-E) is an integral component of kinetochore corona fibers that link centromeres to spindle microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 139, 435–447. doi:10.1083/jcb.139.2.435
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Yao X.,
    2. Abrieu A.,
    3. Zheng Y.,
    4. Sullivan K. F.,
    5. Cleveland D. W.
    (2000). CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 484–491. doi:10.1038/35019518
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Yen T. J.,
    2. Compton D. A.,
    3. Wise D.,
    4. Zinkowski R. P.,
    5. Brinkley B. R.,
    6. Earnshaw W. C.,
    7. Cleveland D. W.
    (1991). CENP-E, a novel human centromere-associated protein required for progression from metaphase to anaphase. EMBO J. 10, 1245–1254.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Yen T. J.,
    2. Li G.,
    3. Schaar B. T.,
    4. Szilak I.,
    5. Cleveland D. W.
    (1992). CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis. Nature 359, 536–539. doi:10.1038/359536a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Yu H.
    (2002). Regulation of APC–Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 706–714. doi:10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00382-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Yucel J. K.,
    2. Marszalek J. D.,
    3. McIntosh J. R.,
    4. Goldstein L. S.,
    5. Cleveland D. W.,
    6. Philp A. V.
    (2000). CENP-meta, an essential kinetochore kinesin required for the maintenance of metaphase chromosome alignment in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1–11. doi:10.1083/jcb.150.1.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

RSSRSS

Keywords

 Download PDF

Email
Research Article
Cenp-meta is required for sustained spindle checkpoint
Thomas Rubin, Roger E. Karess, Zohra Rahmani
Biology Open 2014 3: 522-528; doi: 10.1242/bio.20148490
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article Navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Cover article - Apolipoprotein L9 interacts with LC3/GABARAP and is a microtubule-associated protein with a widespread subcellular distribution

ApoL9 is stained with an anti-V5 antibody (red), and nuclei are stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue).

Arvind A. Thekkinghat, Kamlesh K. Yadav and Pundi N. Rangarajan demonstrate the versatile properties of apolipoprotein L9, a lipid-binding protein, and its influence on a variety of activities taking place inside an animal cell.

Two mice as part of a schematic of the ENU-based suppressor screen in a mouse model of NEB-related NM.

James J. Dowling and his colleagues conducted the first large-scale screening efforts for NEBLUN-related nemaline myopathy to address the urgent need for effective treatment for patients affected by the disease.

Arvind Thekkinghat, Shannon Taylor and Daisuke Takao

Have you seen our interviews with the early-career first authors of our papers? Recently, we caught up with first authors Arvind Thekkinghat, Shannon Taylor and Daisuke Takao.

Biology Open has strong credentials and publishing with us is easy and fast. BiO aims to provide rapid publication for scientifically sound observations and valid conclusions in developmental, cell, experimental and translational biology. Submit your paper here – you’ll be in good company!

Defects of the nervous system in Col4a2-mutated mouse - appearance of the forebrain in semitransparent volume model of head and neck.

Recent developmental biology highlights in BiO – Anna Nele Herdina and her colleagues define the spectrum of phenotypic abnormalities linked with Col4a2 disruption, and demonstrate the opportunities the Deciphering the Mechanisms of Developmental Disorders (DMDD) program offers for exploring rare human diseases.

Transfer to Biology Open

Did you know: if your submission to one of our sister journals, Development, Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Experimental Biology or Disease Models & Mechanisms, is unsuccessful, you can transfer your paper and any reviews directly to Biology Open. The majority of papers transferred with reviews are accepted for publication. Read here to find out more.

BiO partners with Publons.

Biology Open is pleased to announce a new partnership with Publons. This allows reviewers to easily track and verify every review by choosing to add the review to their Publons profile when completing the review submission form. Publons makes it simple for reviewers to showcase their peer review contributions in a format that can be included in job and funding applications (without breaking reviewer anonymity). Read the official announcement here!

preLights - preLights reaches 500 posts!

Photo collage of some of our preLighters

The success of preLights is down to the hard work of our preLighters. Head over to the preLights website to find out more about our most active early-career researchers.