Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Biology Open
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Biology Open

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Regulatory RNPs: a novel class of ribonucleoproteins that potentially contribute to ribosome heterogeneity
Aaron R. Poole, Ian Vicino, Hironori Adachi, Yi-Tao Yu, Michael D. Hebert
Biology Open 2017 6: 1342-1354; doi: 10.1242/bio.028092
Aaron R. Poole
1Department of Biochemistry, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216-4505, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Vicino
1Department of Biochemistry, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216-4505, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hironori Adachi
2Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, The University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi-Tao Yu
2Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, The University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael D. Hebert
1Department of Biochemistry, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216-4505, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael D. Hebert
  • For correspondence: mhebert@umc.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Box C/D and box H/ACA RNPs. (A) Schematic representation of box C/D scaRNA guide interaction with target RNAs promoting methylation (m). (B) Schematic representation of box H/ACA guide interaction with target RNA promoting pseudouridylation (Ψ). In humans, box H/ACA scaRNAs contain a cis element known as the CAB box, which facilitates the interaction of these RNAs with the protein WRAP53 and subsequent localization to CBs. (C) Schematic representation of scaRNA 2, 9, and 17. Both guide domains are shown for each scaRNA and fragments generated from each scaRNA are colored. The locations of the probes used for Northern blotting are indicated by A, B, or C, and the location of the probe used for RNA FISH to detect scaRNA9 is indicated by D. The GU-rich repeat region in scaRNA 2 and 9 is indicated. Also shown is the leader sequence at the 5′ end of scaRNA9 and the AGUG sequence at the beginning of the scaRNA2 mgU2-61 domain. This AGUG sequence was mutated to UCAC.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    The 28 nt leader sequence of scaRNA9 is important for stability and protein interactions. (A) RNA pulldown of WT and mutant scaRNA2 and scaRNA9. Proteins recovered in the pulldown reactions were subjected to SDS-PAGE, western blot transfer, and probing with the indicated antibodies. Background binding of proteins was determined using reactions containing beads alone without RNA bait (lane 2). The input lane (lane 1) accounts for 3% of the lysate used in the pulldown reactions. The location of coilin and coilp1 are indicated, and the relative amount of these proteins recovered by scaRNA9 with the deleted leader sequence (lane 6) compared to WT scaRNA9 (lane 5) is shown in the histogram (n=5 experimental repeats, ***P<0.0005, data are mean±s.e.m.). (B) Northern blotting of RNA isolated from untransfected cells (lane 1) or cells transfected with a DNA construct expressing WT scaRNA9 (lane 2) or scaRNA9 with a deleted leader sequence (lane 3). Probe B, shown in Fig. 1, was used to detect full-length scaRNA9 and the mgU2-30 domain. The blot was also probed for 5S rRNA to verify that equal amounts of RNA were present. (C) RNA FISH/IF was used to localize WT scaRNA9 and scaRNA9ΔLeader. Probe D, shown in Fig. 1, was used to detect full-length scaRNA9 and the mgU2-30 domain by RNA FISH. Arrows indicate Cajal bodies (detected by coilin localization) and arrowheads demarcate nucleoli (determined by DAPI negative regions). The relative intensity of nucleolar to nucleoplasmic RNA FISH signal was quantified for each RNA (histogram, *P<0.05, data are mean±s.e.m., n=20 cells). Scale bars: 2 μm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Coilp1 contributes to the processing of scaRNA 9 and 17. For coilp1 reduction experiments, cells were treated for 24 h with control or coilp1 siRNA, followed by transfection with DNA constructs expressing scaRNA 9 or 17 and harvest/RNA isolation 24 h later (A,C). For coilp1 overexpression experiments, cells were co-transfected with plasmids expressing scaRNA 9 or 17 with GFP-coilp1 or GFP alone (B,D). The RNA was then subjected to Northern blotting using the probes indicated in Fig. 1. Original, as well as adjusted, images are shown. Adjustments were made to images using the High and Low transformation settings of the QuantityOne software. Gamma levels were not changed and the transformation was applied evenly across the entire image for each individual panel. Histograms were generated from the adjusted images and display the quantification of the processed fragment relative to the full-length scaRNA normalized to the control condition. *P<0.05, ***P<0.0005, data are mean±s.e.m., n=3 experimental repeats; scaRNA9 (A,B), scaRNA17 (C,D). Note that ectopic scaRNA9 is expressed from a construct containing an intron. Consequently, full-length ectopic scaRNA9 is the same size as endogenous scaRNA9, which is encoded within an intron. Full-length endogenous scaRNA17 is difficult to detect using Dig probes.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Regulatory RNPs. Base pairing between the nucleolus-enriched fragments of scaRNA2, 9 and 17 with snoRNA. Also shown is the potential for the 3′ loop of mgU2-30 (top right) to base pair with 28S rRNA, possibly blocking ACA3 binding to this site, as well as serve as a binding site for U20 snoRNA. The 5′ loop of scaRNA17-derived mgU4-8 (bottom right), which contains a sequence found in U6 snRNA, might serve as a binding sink for U94 and HBII-166 (not shown) snoRNAs, thereby altering C60 and C62 methylation of U6 snRNA. We propose that these fragments derived from scaRNA 2, 9 and 17 form regulatory RNPs (regRNPs) that influence the modification of sites within 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA and the nucleolar trafficked U6 snRNA.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Methylation of 18S A484 is increased upon reduction of scaRNA17. RNA from control or scaRNA17 siRNA treated cells was subjected to primer extension using 5 different dNTP amounts (indicated) during the reverse transcription step with a radioactive primer complementary to nucleotides 524-544 of 18S rRNA. Samples were run on a denaturing acrylamide gel followed by detection of the radioactive signals. Quantification demonstrates that the A484 pause signal is 1.7-fold more abundant in the scaRNA17 knockdown condition compared to control knockdown (n=6 experimental repeats, P<0.005).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Disruption of the snoRD16/18S rRNA interaction by a fragment of scaRNA17. (A) Extra base paring (shown in amber) (van Nues et al., 2011) between snoRD16 and 18S rRNA predicted to facilitate the methylation of A484 (shown in purple) is shown. (B) The looped region of snoRD16 (from nt 30-40) base pairs with scaRNA17 (regRNP17) from nt 412-402 (Fig. 4). The binding of the nucleolus-enriched fragment derived from scaRNA17, mgU4-8 (regRNP17), may disrupt the interaction of snoRD16 with 18S rRNA, resulting in decreased A484 methylation. (C) RNase protection assays using fragments of snoRD16, 18S rRNA (31 nt, 3′ Dig labeled) and scaRNA17. Reactions containing the indicated RNA were denatured, followed by annealing and incubation with RNase A/T1. The reactions were then resolved on a 15% TBE-urea polyacrylamide gel, followed by Northern blot transfer and detection with anti-Dig antibodies. Because of the intensity of the signal, only 20% of the reaction with 18S rRNA fragment lacking RNase A/T1 was run on the gel (lanes 1 and 6), and the exposure of these lanes is shorter than that for lanes 2-5. Additionally, the reaction sample in lane 6 was supplemented with Dig-labeled DNA oligonucleotides to serve as size markers (indicated by bands at 22 and 18 nt). A protected fragment is observed in lane 4 but not in lane 5.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    The A484 region of 18S rRNA, and snoRD16 associated RNAs. (A) A schematic of 18S rRNA is shown, along with interacting snoRNAs. Note that snoRD16 can form extra base pairing with 18S rRNA (amber nt) by the formation of a loop within snoRD16 (van Nues et al., 2011). Modification of G509, A512 and C517 involves guide snoRNAs that have an overlapping binding site. The underlined sequence in 18S rRNA including C517 is found exactly in snoRD16, which means that snoRD56 can associate with snoRD16. (B) Schematic of snoRD16, which is 101 nt long. The looped region of snoRD16, which interacts with regRNP17, is indicated. The sequence in snoRD16 that is exactly identical to that found in 18S rRNA is indicated by a yellow rectangle. The locations of the snoRD16 C/D and C′/D′ boxes are shown, as well as associations with other snoRNAs.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Model of box C/D scaRNP 2, 9 and 17 biogenesis. Box C/D core proteins (blue) bind scaRNAs after transcription from independent genes (scaRNA2 and scaRNA17) or host gene (scaRNA9). GU dinucleotide repeats (yellow box) in scaRNA2 and 9 are indicated. Nucleolus-enriched RNAs derived from scaRNA2 (mgU2-61), scaRNA9 (mgU2-19 and mgU2-30) and scaRNA17 (mgU4-8), which we propose form regulatory RNPs, are shown. Coilin, SMN and WRAP53 may regulate the activity of Coilp1. It is possible that these interactions take place in the CB (or the nucleoplasm in cells lacking CBs). It is also possible that coilp1 participates in the transport of regRNPs to the nucleolus. Note that the color coding here is the same as that in Fig. 1.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Methylation
  • Cajal body
  • Nucleolus
  • ScaRNA
  • snoRNP

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Biology Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulatory RNPs: a novel class of ribonucleoproteins that potentially contribute to ribosome heterogeneity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Biology Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Biology Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Regulatory RNPs: a novel class of ribonucleoproteins that potentially contribute to ribosome heterogeneity
Aaron R. Poole, Ian Vicino, Hironori Adachi, Yi-Tao Yu, Michael D. Hebert
Biology Open 2017 6: 1342-1354; doi: 10.1242/bio.028092
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Regulatory RNPs: a novel class of ribonucleoproteins that potentially contribute to ribosome heterogeneity
Aaron R. Poole, Ian Vicino, Hironori Adachi, Yi-Tao Yu, Michael D. Hebert
Biology Open 2017 6: 1342-1354; doi: 10.1242/bio.028092

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article Navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Biophysical and biochemical properties of Deup1 self-assemblies: a potential driver for deuterosome formation during multiciliogenesis
  • Conditional targeting of phosphatidylserine decarboxylase to lipid droplets
  • Stability of amino acids and related amines in human serum under different preprocessing and pre-storage conditions based on iTRAQ®-LC-MS/MS
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advertisement

Biology Open and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.


Future Leader Review - Cardiac myosin super relaxation

A new Future Leader Review by Manuel Schmid and Christopher Toepfer discusses the rapidly-expanding field of myosin super relaxation in the context of cardiovascular disease. Read the full Review and their accompanying interview.

Find out more about our Future Leader Reviews – they are an exclusive opportunity for early-career researchers who want to establish themselves in their field.


An interview with Roberta Azzarelli

In an interview, first author Roberta Azzarelli discusses her 3D model of glioblastoma and shares her thoughts on how to improve the professional lives of early-career researchers: formal mentorship programmes, a clearly structured career path and taking part in initiatives such as the Node Network.


News from our sister journals

Development continues to run a successful new webinar series, Development presents…, while Journal of Cell Science has recently welcomed Esperanza Agullo-Pascual as FocalPlane’s new Community Manager. Journal of Experimental Biology’s new special issue highlights the role of comparative biology in tackling climate change and Liz Patton, the new Editor-in-Chief of Disease Models & Mechanisms, sets out her visions and priorities.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About BiO
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact BiO
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992