Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Biology Open
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Biology Open

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
A novel assessment of the traction forces upon settlement of two typical marine fouling invertebrates using PDMS micropost arrays
Kang Xiao, Wen-Bin Cao, Cu-Huang Rong, Lian-Guo Chen, Xiao-Xue Yang, Wei-Jia Wen, Pei-Yuan Qian, Zhang-Li Hu, Ying Xu, Yu Zhang
Biology Open 2018 7: bio030262 doi: 10.1242/bio.030262 Published 5 January 2018
Kang Xiao
1Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresource and Eco-environmental Science, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Marine Algal Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P.R. China
2Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kang Xiao
Wen-Bin Cao
3Department of Physics, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cu-Huang Rong
1Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresource and Eco-environmental Science, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Marine Algal Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lian-Guo Chen
4Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiao-Xue Yang
4Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei-Jia Wen
3Department of Physics, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pei-Yuan Qian
4Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhang-Li Hu
1Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresource and Eco-environmental Science, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Marine Algal Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ying Xu
1Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresource and Eco-environmental Science, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Marine Algal Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ying Xu
  • For correspondence: boxuying@szu.edu.cn biozy@szu.edu.cn
Yu Zhang
1Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresource and Eco-environmental Science, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Marine Algal Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yu Zhang
  • For correspondence: boxuying@szu.edu.cn biozy@szu.edu.cn
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Marine biofouling poses a severe threat to maritime and aquaculture industries. To prevent the attachment of marine biofouling organisms on man-made structures, countless cost and effort was spent annually. In particular, most attention has been paid on the development of efficient and environmentally friendly fouling-resistant coatings, as well as larval settlement mechanism of several major biofouling invertebrates. In this study, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) micropost arrays were utilized as the settlement substrata and opposite tractions were identified during early settlement of the barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite and the bryozoan Bugula neritina. The settling A. amphitrite pushed the periphery microposts with an average traction force of 376.2 nN, while settling B. neritina pulled the periphery microposts with an average traction force of 205.9 nN. These micropost displacements are consistent with the body expansion of A. amphitrite during early post-settlement metamorphosis stage and elevation of wall epithelium of B. neritina during early pre-ancestrula stage, respectively. As such, the usage of micropost array may supplement the traditional histological approach to indicate the early settlement stages or even the initiation of larval settlement of marine fouling organisms, and could finally aid in the development of automatic monitoring platform for the real-time analysis on this complex biological process.

INTRODUCTION

Marine biofouling refers to the undesirable accumulation of living organisms including microorganisms, seaweeds, and animals on submerged surfaces (Callow and Callow, 2002). Among which, fouling invertebrates cause major damage to ship hulls and propulsors, block mariculture cages and water pipes, increase fuel consumption of marine transport, and therefore are one of the most serious problems of maritime and aquaculture industries (Yebra et al., 2004; Schultz et al., 2011; Clare, 1995). For instance, US navy vessels spend 180 to 260 million US dollars annually to control and prevent biofouling (Schultz et al., 2011). Historically, a variety of physical and chemical antifouling methods have been implemented (Qian et al., 2013). In particular, the most commonly employed practice is to coat submerged surfaces with biocidal paints, such as organotin, tributyltin (TBT), Irgarol 1051 and Sea-Nine 211 (Qian et al., 2013). Due to the threat to the marine environment revealed after a long-term application, e.g. toxicity on non-target marine organisms, some biocides were banned or restricted in recent years (Cresswell et al., 2006; Qian et al., 2013). The development of effective and environmentally friendly antifouling technique requires a more in-depth understanding of environmental risk and working mechanisms of antifouling compounds.

In previous studies, multiple omics and biological approaches have been utilized to reveal the detailed developmental process (Qian et al., 2013), the key biomarkers and major signaling pathways in larval settlement of the major marine biofouling species, including the barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite, the polychaete Hydroides elegans and the bryozoan Bugula neritina. In particular, the temporal and spatial metamorphic changes of fouling organisms were mainly examined by histological studies. Through these, the unique developmental patterns of different species, such as A. amphitrite (Bernard and Lane, 1962; Maruzzo et al., 2012) and B. neritina (Reed and Woollacott, 1983; Wong et al., 2012), have been revealed. Furthermore, the histological staining, which showed the anatomy of B. neritina during metamorphosis, served as the reference map to precisely interpret the spatial gene expression patterns and the involvement of certain signaling pathways underlying metamorphosis (Wong et al., 2012). Although the current techniques such as light sheet microscopy have enabled the non-destructive slide-free observations on thick intact tissues or organisms (Cella Zanacchi et al., 2011; Cresswell et al., 2006), the histological studies require a complex sample preparation and data acquisition process and cannot be analyzed in a real-time manner. Therefore, supplementary simple and real-time approaches are demanded for high-throughput developmental pattern exploration of marine fouling organisms.

Researchers have adopted a variety of physical and chemical approaches to examine the settlement preference, strength and elemental characterization for a better understanding of the settlement mechanisms. For instance, the adhesion strength of adult A. amphitrite has already been measured by applying a mechanical shear force to the organism base (Swain et al., 1992; Conlan et al., 2008). To overcome the drawbacks of the shear-force method, Aldred et al. assessed the attachment strength of A. amphitrite cyprids by a calibrated water jet, and the settlement preference of A. amphitrite on the textures sized from 0 to 512 μm on PDMS microtextured matrix was also examined (Aldred et al., 2010). Also, protein deposits of A. amphitrite during surface exploration on model surfaces with variable hydrophilicities were studied by Atomic Force Microscope, revealing a positive relationship between protein deposits and hydrophobicity (Guo et al., 2014). More recently, the elemental distributions during the early attachment phase of A. amphitrite larvae and juvenile A. amphitrite were established by synchrotron radiation-based μ-XRF, which may inspire further functional investigations on the previously unrecognized elements, including bromine, iron, and selenium identified in the cyprid permanent adhesive (Senkbeil et al., 2016). However, the assessment on the dynamic morphological changes of settling fouling organisms using physical approaches has not been reported.

Because of the advantages in mechanical application and quantitative measurements, PDMS micropost arrays have been employed in a wide spectrum of biological and chemical studies, including assessing macromolecular transport (Chien et al., 2017) and designing dielectrophoretic trapping (Mohammadi et al., 2016). Comparable studies were performed to assess the mechanics of adhesive mammalian cells and to clarify the correlation of biochemical and mechanical signals (Beussman et al., 2016; Rodriguez et al., 2014; Tan et al., 2003; Saez et al., 2007). In particular, the contractile forces of cardiomyocytes were measured through calculating the twitch force of bending cylindrical posts by beam-bending theory (Beussman et al., 2016; Rodriguez et al., 2014). Therefore, in this study, PDMS micropost arrays were utilized as the settlement substrata to assess the horizontal movements caused by morphological changes of settling fouling organisms. The assessment results may assist to develop a real-time observation method supplementing traditional histological approaches.

RESULTS

Different basal tractions upon Amphibalanus amphitrite and Bugula neritina settlement

In both A. amphitrite and B. neritina, displacements of micropost tips surrounding the settling individuals were observed (Fig. 1). However, the directions of displacements in these two fouling species were opposite. The settled A. amphitrite pushed the periphery microposts in the centrifugal direction (Fig. 1B,C). In contrast, the settled B. neritina pulled the periphery microposts in centripetal direction (Fig. 1E,F). To ensure the accuracy of the measurement of tip displacement, the initial tip positions of displaced microposts were determined by the alignment (dark lines) of micropost tips, and then the displacements were indicated in red lines by the comparison between initial and displaced positions and measured twice by ImageJ (Fig. 2A). As measured from hundreds of tilt microposts, the absolute values of micropost tip displacements caused by settled A. amphitrite and B. neritina were 11.00±0.84 μm (n=188) and 6.02±1.19 μm (n=277), respectively (Fig. 2B). Assuming that the outward micropost displacement and the pushing force of settling A. amphitrite individuals are positive values, then the inward micropost displacement and the pulling force of settling bryozoan individuals are negative. As calculated according to formula (Eqn 8), the average traction forces of settled A. amphitrite and B. neritina were 376.2 nN and −205.9 nN, suggesting A. amphitrite may exert much stronger traction force than bryozoan. The values of traction forces of settled fouling species are 10 times more than the reported contractile forces of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) (Rodriguez et al., 2014), which is possibly due to the difference in the body mass of different organisms.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Microscopic images of settling the barnacle A. amphitrite and the bryozoan B. neritina cyprids. (A) Early settled A. amphitrite cyprid. (B) Settled A. amphitrite juvenile. (D) Early pre-ancestrula 4 h stage of B. neritina. (E) Early pre-ancestrula 1 h stage of B. neritina. The regions marked with rectangles in B and E were enlarged and shown in panels C and F, respectively. The arrows indicate the directions of micropost tip displacements. Micropost intervals: 40 μm (A), 35 μm (B,C), 15 μm (D) and 20 μm (E,F). Scale bars: 40 μm (A), 35 μm (B), 10 μm (C), 15 μm (D), 40 μm (E) and 20 μm (F).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

The quantitative analysis on PDMS micropost displacements caused by settling the barnacle A. amphitrite and the bryozoan B. neritina cyprids. (A) A figure illustrating how micropost displacements were measured. Black and red lines represent micropost alignment for determination of initial positions and micropost displacements respectively. Post intervals: 35 μm. (B) The comparison of micropost displacements caused by settling A. amphitrite and B. neritina cyprids. Data is displayed as mean±s.d.

Images of settling A. amphitrite individuals were captured by stereomicroscope at 48 h after sample loading (juvenile stage). As shown in Fig. 1A,B, two types of morphologies were observed among the settling A. amphitrite individuals, which could be classified into early settlement stage (also called ‘settled pad’, Fig. 1A) and juvenile stage (Fig. 1B), and this is due to the asynchronous development of each individual. In contrast to bryozoan, only A. amphitrite individuals in juvenile stage but not in early settlement stage pushed the periphery microposts away from their own bodies, as micropost displacement could only be observed in the juvenile stage but not in the early settlement stage. In early settlement stage, A. amphitrite cyprids loosely attached to the substrata and body expansion was not observed (Fig. 3A, middle panel). At 48 h post sample loading, the just-settled individuals developed into juveniles with obvious body expansions in bilateral directions. The periphery microposts were centrifugally pushed by the expanding body, leading to the observation of outward micropost displacements (Fig. 3A, right panel). As such, metamorphic difference between two developmental stages can be identified and distinguished by micropost displacement.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Diagrams of the correlation between micropost displacements and the metamorphic changes of A. amphitrite and B. neritina cyprids during early post-attachment development. (A) Diagrams showing A. amphitrite cyprids developed from swimming stage (left panel, side view), early settlement stage (middle panel, side view) to juvenile (right panel, front view). Micropost interval: 20 μm. (B) Side view diagrams showing B. neritina cyprids developed from swimming stage (left panel) to two pre-ancestrula stages (middle and right panels). The arrows indicate the elevation of wall epithelium. Micropost interval: 35 μm.

Similarly, settling B. neritina individuals were imaged by stereomicroscope at 4 h after sample loading, which were within the early pre-ancestrula stage according to the previous reported histological study (Wong et al., 2012). As shown in Fig. 1D,E, two types of morphologies were observed from the settling individuals, which could be classified into early pre-ancestrula 1-h stage (Fig. 1E) and early pre-ancestrula 4-h stage (Fig. 1D). Interestingly, only individuals in the early pre-ancestrula 1-h stage, but not 4-h stage, pulled the periphery microposts toward their own bodies. At early pre-ancestrula 1-h stage, the wall epithelium rose slowly over the aboral hemisphere (Reed and Woollacott, 1983), so the periphery microposts were centripetally pulled by the rising tissue, leading to the observation of inward micropost displacements (Fig. 3B, middle panel). In early pre-ancestrula 4-h stage, the elevation of wall epithelium has completed, therefore the periphery microposts were no longer pulled and no displacement could be observed (Fig. 3B, right panel). Therefore, these observations agree well with those of the previously reported histology studies and reveal the relation of micropost displacement and the metamorphic change of settling B. neritina individuals.

DISCUSSION

Rectangular posts versus cylindrical posts

Polydimethylsiloxane micropost arrays have already been utilized to assess the contractile forces of cardiomyocytes (Beussman et al., 2016; Rodriguez et al., 2014). However, these studies employed cylindrical microposts instead of rectangular microposts used in the current study. As the influence of twitch force angle needs to be taken into consideration, the calculation of the twitch forces in this study becomes more complicated. Project the twitch force Fxy to the x-axis and the y-axis to create Fx and Fy in perpendicular directions. Regardless of the micropost shape, the relation formula between twitch force Fxy and Fx is Embedded Image (1)The theoretical maximum influence of twitch force angle lies in Fxy, in which twitch force angle θ is equal to 45°. Therefore, the maximum Fxy approximates to Embedded ImageFx and the maximum error to calculate Fxy by Eqn 1, in which the twitch force angle was ignored is roughly 41%.

On the other hand, as shown in Fig. 5B, the range of Fxy can be determined as Fx=Fy<Fxy<FD, in which FD is the twitch force of a cylindrical micropost with the diameter D of the cross section equal to Embedded ImageL. Fx and Fy are calculated by Eqn 7. Therefore, the relation formula between FD and Fx is Embedded Image (2)Thus FD is roughly 2.36 times over Fx, while Fxy is less than 2.36 times of Fx. Since the standard deviations are less than 20% of the measured displacement values, the influence of twitch force angle did not significantly reduce the importance of the estimation/calculation method of this study and the drawback of rectangular posts compared with cylindrical posts can be neglected. Yet, cylindrical posts will be used in future experiments to improve the accuracy of the estimation and calculation.

Large deflections versus small deflections

The tip deflection ratio βx is introduced as follows: Embedded Image (3)The measured micropost tip displacements caused by settling B. neritina and A. amphitrite were roughly 6 and 11 μm, so the deflection ratios were 24% and 44% respectively. Eqns 4 to 8, based on beam-bending theory, can merely be applied for small deflections within the linear range. Therefore, a proper non-linear modification for calculating large deflections should be employed. With regard to the evaluation of large deflections of cantilever beams, a few studies have proposed analytical analysis of the nonlinear deformation of beams based on elliptic integrals and functions in a variety of complex ways (Kimiaeifar et al., 2014; Ghaffarzadeh and Nikkar, 2013). However, according to Beléndez's work, when βx are 24% and 44%, the corresponding deviations between the linear approximations and non-linear exact solutions are roughly 7.6% and 24.1% (Beléndez et al., 2002). Therefore, the importance and accuracy of the calculation method of this study were not significantly reduced although the micropost deflections caused by settling B. neritina and A. amphitrite were beyond linear range.

Alternatively, small deflections caused by settling fouling organisms can be realized by applying PDMS microposts with increased size or stiffness in the future work. Thus, the linear calculation method will be applicable. Furthermore, the most accurate approach is to measure the relation curve between exerted forces and micropost displacements, and then simulate the calculation equation, so the certain exerted forces corresponding to micropost displacements can be calculated accordingly. Through this, the accuracy of the calculated traction forces will be remarkably enhanced.

Advantages of PDMS micropost in assessing the dynamic settlement

Polydimethylsiloxane has also been successfully utilized in the study of marine fouling organisms, e.g. the settlement preference of marine fouling organisms on PDMS with different texture profiles and sizes was examined (Aldred et al., 2010; Vucko et al., 2014). However, most of these studies did not focus on the dynamic post-attachment metamorphic changes of marine fouling organisms. In this study, we proposed a novel application of PDMS chips or devices in the fouling mechanism studies. Compared with the abundance of technical approaches in cell experiments, tools for studying marine biofouling organisms are very limited, mainly due to the poor understanding of genetic information and signaling pathways, as well as the auto-fluorescence in many marine invertebrates. For instance, fluorescent microposts and cellular biomarkers were both used to enhance the convenience and accuracy of the assessment on cardiomyocytes (Beussman et al., 2016; Rodriguez et al., 2014). However, this may be unfeasible for assessing B. neritina or A. amphitrite because the observed strong auto-fluorescence of B. neritina or A. amphitrite (Kamiya et al., 2012) will conceal the fluorescent microposts underneath settling individuals. Nevertheless, PDMS micropost array used in the current study possesses many advantages as compared with other platforms. For example, the observation of micropost displacement and the following calculation of traction force have allowed us to determine the settlement status of two representative fouling species, which have distinct morphological and histological changes. In addition, the transparent nature of PDMS makes it possible to record the morphological changes from both the dorsal and ventral sides. As such, real time imaging the morphological changes from both dorsal and ventral views of the settling organism could be implemented in future studies, to improve the quantitative accuracy and broaden the applications of this PDMS chip.

The prospective applications of PDMS micropost array in marine biofouling and antifouling studies

This study represents the first report of calculating the traction force of the common settling marine biofouling invertebrates (the bryozoan B. neritina and the barnacle A. amphitrite) during early post-attachment metamorphosis. The findings in this study may assist the design of a powerful real-time platform for both fouling mechanism studies and anti-fouling drug screening. In particular, in the mechanism studies, micropost displacements caused by the settling of individuals at certain time points can serve as temporal markers to indicate the corresponding developmental stages of both explored and unexplored fouling species. On basis of this, the application of micropost, together with imaging and recording techniques, can serve as an automatic platform to calculate the settlement rate of fouling invertebrates, and subsequently being used as a high-throughput system to determine the efficiency and/or toxicity of antifouling chemicals.

Conclusions

In summary, the settling bryozoan B. neritina and the barnacle A. amphitrite in early settlement stages caused opposite displacements of PDMS microposts, which were correlated with the respective wall epithelium elevation and body expansion during their early post-attachment metamorphosis. This method may provide an intuitional tool to supplement the traditional histological approach for a mechanism study of marine biofouling organisms, and to assist the development of a powerful real-time analysis platform for anti-fouling drug screening in the future.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Design and fabrication of PDMS micropost arrays

The 25-μm height micropost substrate was fabricated on a silicon wafer by the standard photolithographic methods (Duffy et al., 1998; Zhou et al., 2015). The fabrication processing flow charts of the patterned Si mold and PDMS micropost arrays were illustrated in Fig. 4. Briefly, the mold with an integrated array of 5-microwell was fabricated by standard UV photolithography and deep reactive-ion etching (DRIE) on a clean silicon wafer. The depth of the microwell was etched to ∼25 μm. Next, the silicon mold was silanized with (tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)-1-trichloro silane for days in a sealed vacuum chamber. After UV exposure (SUSS Microtec MA6, Garching bei München, Germany) of photoresist on Si wafer and pattern developing, the oxide layer without photoresist cover was further etched by the advanced oxide etch (STS-AOE Etcher, Surface Technology Systems, Coventry, UK), and undergone deep reactive ion etching (ICP DRIE, Surface Technology Systems, Coventry, UK) to generate vertical wells. Finally, the photoresist layer and oxide layer were removed by plasma cleaning process (PS210 Photo Resist Asher) and oxide etcher respectively. Then, as shown in Fig. 4B, PDMS was produced with Sylgard 184 silicone elastomer mixture (Dow Corning Corporation, Miland, USA) at a Base to Curing agent ratio of 10:1. This PDMS mixture was then slowly poured over the patterned region of the mold and placed in a vacuum oven for degasification. The PDMS and the mold were then placed on the hotplate to cure at 70°C for 4 h. After curing, the PDMS layer was gently peeled off in ethanol solution and kept inside the ethanol for ease of releasing and sustaining the microposts at the same time. The PDMS chip was then dried in a CO2 supercritical point dryer machine (Automegamdri-916B series C, Tousimis) to prevent the microposts from collapsing during the drying process induced by the capillary force. Finally, each PDMS micropost has a cross section length of either 5 or 10 μm and a height of 25 μm. And the center-to-center interval of 20, 25, 35 or 45 μm was fabricated for assessment. A representative SEM (scanning electron microscope, Tabletop Microscope TM3000, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) image of PDMS micropost array is shown in Fig. 4C. The Young's modulus of as-fabricated PDMS was measured by MTS electromechanical universal testing machine CMT4204 (Tianjin, China).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Flowchart of PDMS micropost array fabrication. (A) Silicon mold fabrication process. (B) Fabrication of PDMS microposts on silicon mold. (C) A representative SEM image of fabricated PDMS micropost array. Post interval: 25 μm.

Amphibalanus amphitrite and Bugula neritina larval sample preparation

A. amphitrite larval sample was prepared following procedures of Zhang et al. (2010). Briefly, adult A. amphitrite were collected from the concrete pier posts at Pak Sha Wan in Hong Kong (22°21′45″N, 114°15′35″E), the released naupliar larvae induced by light were kept in 0.22-μm filtered seawater (FSW) for 3 h. The nauplii developed into cyprids on day 4 when reared on a diet of Chaetoceros gracilis Schuttat (1.0×106 cells ml−1) at 28°C. Once the larvae reached the cyprid stage, they were transferred into a petri-dish containing PDMS micropost arrays immersed in FSW (roughly 50 cyprids per square centimeter).

B. neritina larval sample was prepared according to the procedures of Wong et al. (2012). Briefly, adult colonies of B. neritina were collected from the floating rafts of a fish farm in San Shing Wan, Hong Kong (22°21′19″N, 114°16′15″E) and maintained in an aquarium with 21°C flow-through seawater for less than 7 days before use. Adults were induced to spawn under a bright artificial light and the larvae were collected for experiments using a mesh with 100-μm pore size (Wang et al., 2010; Wong et al., 2012). The sample loading process was similar to that of A. amphitrite.

Image acquisition and analysis

Three experimental replicates were performed. The images of B. neritina and A. amphitrite settlement experiments were taken by a stereomicroscope (Olympus IX61, Tokyo, Japan) at 4 h and 48 h after sample loading, respectively. The displacements of micropost tips were measured by comparing their current and initial positions. The acquired images were further processed by Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems), and the value of microposts displacement was measured and analyzed by ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, NIH). Quantitative data in the text were reported as mean±standard error.

Calculation of the traction forces by beam-bending theory

At 4 h and 48 h after sample loading, B. neritina and A. amphitrite settled on top of the micropost arrays and underwent dramatic morphological changes, and consequently drove the tilt of the microposts. As the settling organisms merely contact the top of the microposts, microposts are modeled as cantilever beams which are fixed at one end and undergo deflections at the free end, the pulling or pushing force (or the point load) at the free end can be calculated by beam-bending theory. The reported calculation of twitch force of bending cylindrical post was performed by following equation (Rodriguez et al., 2014): Embedded Image (4)where D is the diameter, E is the Young's modulus (3.42 MPa), H is the height (25 μm) of each micropost and X is the tip displacement of the micropost (Fig. 5A). Since the microposts are fabricated in rectangular instead of cylindrical, the rectangle section modulus is: Embedded Image (5)which substitutes the section modulus of the circular section: Embedded Image (6)to generate the equation for calculating the twitch force of bending rectangular post: Embedded Image (7)After the values of the parameter E, L and H are applied in Eqn 7, the formula for calculating twitch force of bending rectangular post becomes: Embedded Image (8)where F and X are in the scales of nano-newton (nN) and micrometer (μm), respectively.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Diagrams of calculation of micropost twitch force by beam-bending theory. (A) Diagram of a tilt micropost caused by the point load at the free end exerted by settling cyprid. L is the cross section length of microposts (5 μm), H is the height of microposts (25 μm), X is the tip displacement of microposts, and F is the twitch force. (B) Diagram of the comparison of twitch forces in different directions or micropost shapes. Fx and Fy, equal to F in (A), represent the twitch forces in perpendicular directions with the force angle of 0° or 90°. Fxy represents the twitch forces with a force angle θ (0°<θ<90°). FD is the twitch force of a cylindrical micropost with the diameter D of the circular cross section which is equal to Embedded ImageL.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    Conceptualization: K.X., W.-B.C., Y.Z.; Methodology: K.X., W.-B.C., L.-G.C., X.Y.; Software: K.X.; Validation: K.X.; Formal analysis: K.X., W.-B.C.; Investigation: K.X., W.-B.C.; Data curation: K.X., W.-B.C.; Writing - original draft: K.X., W.-B.C., C.-H.R.; Writing - review & editing: K.X., C.-H.R., Y.X., Y.Z.; Supervision: W.-J.W., P.-Y.Q., Z.-L.H., Y.X., Y.Z.; Project administration: Y.X., Y.Z.; Funding acquisition: W.-J.W., P.-Y.Q., Z.-L.H., Y.X., Y.Z.

  • Funding

    This work was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 41576146]; Scientific and Technical Innovation Council of Shenzhen Government [grant numbers 827000012, 827000041, JCYJ20150625102622556]; Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [grant number 2014A030310230].

  • Received September 29, 2017.
  • Accepted November 28, 2017.
  • © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aldred, N.,
    2. Scardino, A.,
    3. Cavaco, A.,
    4. de Nys, R. and
    5. Clare, A. S.
    (2010). Attachment strength is a key factor in the selection of surfaces by barnacle cyprids (Balanus amphitrite) during settlement. Biofouling 26, 287-299. doi:10.1080/08927010903511626
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Beléndez, T.,
    2. Neipp, C. and
    3. Beléndez, A.
    (2002). Large and small deflections of a cantilever beam. Eur. J. Phys. 23, 371. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/23/3/317
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Bernard, F. J. and
    2. Lane, C. E.
    (1962). Early settlement and metamorphosis of barnacle balanus amphitrite niveus. J. Morphol. 110, 19-39. doi:10.1002/jmor.1051100103
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Beussman, K. M.,
    2. Rodriguez, M. L.,
    3. Leonard, A.,
    4. Taparia, N.,
    5. Thompson, C. R. and
    6. Sniadecki, N. J.
    (2016). Micropost arrays for measuring stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte contractility. Methods 94, 43-50. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.09.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Callow, M. E. and
    2. Callow, J. E.
    (2002). Marine biofouling: a sticky problem. Biologist (London) 49, 10-14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Cella Zanacchi, F.,
    2. Lavagnino, Z.,
    3. Perrone Donnorso, M.,
    4. Del Bue, A.,
    5. Furia, L.,
    6. Faretta, M. and
    7. Diaspro, A.
    (2011). Live-cell 3D super-resolution imaging in thick biological samples. Nat. Methods 8, 1047-1049. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1744
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Chien, F.-T.,
    2. Lin, P.-K.,
    3. Chien, W.,
    4. Hung, C.-H.,
    5. Yu, M.-H.,
    6. Chou, C.-F. and
    7. Chen, Y.-L.
    (2017). Crowding-facilitated macromolecular transport in attractive micropost arrays. Sci. Rep. 7, 1340. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01248-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Clare, A.
    (1995). Natural ways to banish barnacles. New Sci. 145, 38-41.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Conlan, S. L.,
    2. Mutton, R. J.,
    3. Aldred, N. and
    4. Clare, A. S.
    (2008). Evaluation of a fully automated method to measure the critical removal stress of adult barnacles. Biofouling 24, 471-481. doi:10.1080/08927010802353716
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cresswell, T.,
    2. Richards, J. P.,
    3. Glegg, G. A. and
    4. Readman, J. W.
    (2006). The impact of legislation on the usage and environmental concentrations of Irgarol 1051 in UK coastal waters. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 52, 1169-1175. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.01.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Duffy, D. C.,
    2. Mcdonald, J. C.,
    3. Schueller, O. J. A. and
    4. Whitesides, G. M.
    (1998). Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 70, 4974-4984. doi:10.1021/ac980656z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Ghaffarzadeh, H. and
    2. Nikkar, A.
    (2013). Explicit solution to the large deformation of a cantilever beam under point load at the free tip using the variational iteration method-II. JMST 27, 3433-3438. doi:10.1007/s12206-013-0866-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Guo, S.,
    2. Puniredd, S. R.,
    3. Jańczewski, D.,
    4. Lee, S. S.,
    5. Teo, S. L.,
    6. He, T.,
    7. Zhu, X. and
    8. Vancso, G. J.
    (2014). Barnacle larvae exploring surfaces with variable hydrophilicity: influence of morphology and adhesion of “footprint” proteins by AFM. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 13667-13676. doi:10.1021/am503147m
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Kamiya, K.,
    2. Yamashita, K.,
    3. Yanagawa, T.,
    4. Kawabata, T. and
    5. Watanabe, K.
    (2012). Cypris larvae (Cirripedia: Balanomorpha) display auto-fluorescence in nearly species-specific patterns. Zoolog. Sci. 29, 247-253. doi:10.2108/zsj.29.247
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kimiaeifar, A.,
    2. Tolou, N.,
    3. Barari, A. and
    4. Herder, J. L.
    (2014). Large deflection analysis of cantilever beam under end point and distributed loads. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 37, 438-445. doi:10.1080/02533839.2013.814991
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Maruzzo, D.,
    2. Aldred, N.,
    3. Clare, A. S. and
    4. Høeg, J. T.
    (2012). Metamorphosis in the cirripede crustacean Balanus amphitrite. PLoS ONE 7, e37408. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Mohammadi, M.,
    2. Zare, M. J.,
    3. Madadi, H.,
    4. Sellarès, J. and
    5. Casals-Terré, J.
    (2016). A new approach to design an efficient micropost array for enhanced direct-current insulator-based dielectrophoretic trapping. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 408, 5285-5294. doi:10.1007/s00216-016-9629-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Qian, P.-Y.,
    2. Chen, L. and
    3. Xu, Y.
    (2013). Mini-review: molecular mechanisms of antifouling compounds. Biofouling 29, 381-400. doi:10.1080/08927014.2013.776546
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Reed, C. G. and
    2. Woollacott, R. M.
    (1983). Mechanisms of rapid morphogenetic movements in the metamorphosis of the bryozoan bugula-neritina (Cheilostomata, Cellularioidea). II. The role of dynamic assemblages of microfilaments in the pallial epithelium. J. Morphol. 177, 127-143. doi:10.1002/jmor.1051770202
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Rodriguez, M. L.,
    2. Graham, B. T.,
    3. Pabon, L. M.,
    4. Han, S. J.,
    5. Murry, C. E. and
    6. Sniadecki, N. J.
    (2014). Measuring the contractile forces of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes with arrays of microposts. J. Biomech. Eng. 136, 051005. doi:10.1115/1.4027145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Saez, A.,
    2. Ghibaudo, M.,
    3. Buguin, A.,
    4. Silberzan, P. and
    5. Ladoux, B.
    (2007). Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8281-8286. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702259104
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Schultz, M. P.,
    2. Bendick, J. A.,
    3. Holm, E. R. and
    4. Hertel, W. M.
    (2011). Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling 27, 87-98. doi:10.1080/08927014.2010.542809
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Senkbeil, T.,
    2. Mohamed, T.,
    3. Simon, R.,
    4. Batchelor, D.,
    5. Di Fino, A.,
    6. Aldred, N.,
    7. Clare, A. S. and
    8. Rosenhahn, A.
    (2016). In vivo and in situ synchrotron radiation-based mu-XRF reveals elemental distributions during the early attachment phase of barnacle larvae and juvenile barnacles. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 408, 1487-1496. doi:10.1007/s00216-015-9253-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Swain, G. W.,
    2. Griffith, J. R.,
    3. Bultman, J. D. and
    4. Vincent, H. L.
    (1992). The use of barnacle adhesion measurements for the field evaluation of non-toxic foul release surfaces. Biofouling 6, 105-114. doi:10.1080/08927019209386216
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Tan, J. L.,
    2. Tien, J.,
    3. Pirone, D. M.,
    4. Gray, D. S.,
    5. Bhadriraju, K. and
    6. Chen, C. S.
    (2003). Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1484-1489. doi:10.1073/pnas.0235407100
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Vucko, M. J.,
    2. Poole, A. J.,
    3. Carl, C.,
    4. Sexton, B. A.,
    5. Glenn, F. L.,
    6. Whalan, S. and
    7. De Nys, R.
    (2014). Using textured PDMS to prevent settlement and enhance release of marine fouling organisms. Biofouling 30, 1-16. doi:10.1080/08927014.2013.836507
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Wang, H.,
    2. Zhang, H.,
    3. Wong, Y. H.,
    4. Voolstra, C.,
    5. Ravasi, T.,
    6. Bajic, V. B. and
    7. Qian, P.-Y.
    (2010). Rapid transcriptome and proteome profiling of a non-model marine invertebrate, Bugula neritina. Proteomics 10, 2972-2981. doi:10.1002/pmic.201000056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Wong, Y.,
    2. Wang, H.,
    3. Ravasi, T. and
    4. Qian, P.-Y.
    (2012). Involvement of Wnt signaling pathways in the metamorphosis of the bryozoan Bugula neritina. PLoS ONE 7, e33323. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033323
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Yebra, D. M.,
    2. Kiil, S. and
    3. Dam-Johansen, K.
    (2004). Antifouling technology-past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 50, 75-104. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2003.06.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Zhang, Y.,
    2. Xu, Y.,
    3. Arellano, S. M.,
    4. Xiao, K. and
    5. Qian, P.-Y.
    (2010). Comparative proteome and phosphoproteome analyses during cyprid development of the barnacle Balanus (=Amphibalanus) amphitrite. J. Proteome Res. 9, 3146-3157. doi:10.1021/pr1000384
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Zhou, B.,
    2. Xu, W.,
    3. Syed, A. A.,
    4. Chau, Y.,
    5. Chen, L.,
    6. Chew, B.,
    7. Yassine, O.,
    8. Wu, X.,
    9. Gao, Y.,
    10. Zhang, J. et al.
    (2015). Design and fabrication of magnetically functionalized flexible micropillar arrays for rapid and controllable microfluidic mixing. Lab. Chip 15, 2125-2132. doi:10.1039/C5LC00173K
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Marine biofouling
  • Barnacle
  • Bryozoan
  • Metamorphosis
  • PDMS micropost arrays
  • Traction force

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Biology Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A novel assessment of the traction forces upon settlement of two typical marine fouling invertebrates using PDMS micropost arrays
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Biology Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Biology Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
A novel assessment of the traction forces upon settlement of two typical marine fouling invertebrates using PDMS micropost arrays
Kang Xiao, Wen-Bin Cao, Cu-Huang Rong, Lian-Guo Chen, Xiao-Xue Yang, Wei-Jia Wen, Pei-Yuan Qian, Zhang-Li Hu, Ying Xu, Yu Zhang
Biology Open 2018 7: bio030262 doi: 10.1242/bio.030262 Published 5 January 2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
A novel assessment of the traction forces upon settlement of two typical marine fouling invertebrates using PDMS micropost arrays
Kang Xiao, Wen-Bin Cao, Cu-Huang Rong, Lian-Guo Chen, Xiao-Xue Yang, Wei-Jia Wen, Pei-Yuan Qian, Zhang-Li Hu, Ying Xu, Yu Zhang
Biology Open 2018 7: bio030262 doi: 10.1242/bio.030262 Published 5 January 2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article Navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIAL AND METHODS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Stability of amino acids and related amines in human serum under different preprocessing and pre-storage conditions based on iTRAQ®-LC-MS/MS
  • Tetraspanin18 regulates angiogenesis through VEGFR2 and Notch pathways
  • Segregation of brain and organizer precursors is differentially regulated by Nodal signaling at blastula stage
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advertisement

Biology Open and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Future Leader Review – early neurodegeneration of Alzheimer’s disease

A new Future Leader Review from Olayemi Olajide, Marcus Suvanto and Clifton Andrew Chapman evaluates the molecular mechanisms that may explain the vulnerability and susceptibility of the entorhinal cortex to early neurodegeneration during the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease.

Find out more about our Future Leader Reviews – they are an exclusive opportunity for early-career researchers who want to establish themselves in their field.


First author interviews

Catch up on our latest first author interviews to go behind the scenes of our latest research, find out more about the authors and hear from early-career researchers themselves how they’re finding life at the bench.


Retinal degeneration in Drosophila

Thank you to Elisabeth Knust and her team for their confocal image of a longitudinal section of an adult Drosophila retina, which brightens the cover of our latest issue. Read the research behind the cover.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About BiO
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact BiO
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992