Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer option
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Biology Open
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Biology Open

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer option
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
First Person
First person – Daiana Almeida De Souza
Biology Open 2018 7: bio039313 doi: 10.1242/bio.039313 Published 22 November 2018
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

ANSTRACT

First Person is a series of interviews with the first authors of a selection of papers published in Biology Open, helping early-career researchers promote themselves alongside their papers. Daiana Almeida De Souza is first author on ‘Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ’, published in BiO. Daiana is a postdoctoral researcher in the lab of David Tarpy at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA, investigating honey bees.

Embedded Image

Daiana Almeida De Souza

What is your scientific background and the general focus of your lab?

Despite dedicating all my scientific career to honey bee (Apis mellifera) studies, my background could be considered a multi-faceted one. I have worked with honey bees since the beginning. I started with behavioral studies during my scientific initiation from my undergrad to my master's degree, where I had great experiences on this wonderful social insect's behavioral complexity, starting in my home country, Brazil. During my PhD, I began to work with honey bee queen quality, focusing on a genetic improvement program, looking for morphological features that would indicate better reproductive performance both physiologically, genetically and behaviorally. During this time, I noticed that the developmental biology trajectory of immature forms up to adulthood is much more important in how a future queen leads their colony than we were previously considering, due to the intricate caste determination process. This assertion led me to my first country outing to the U.S., where I worked in Robert Page's lab at Arizona State University, studying how the environment drives the fertility and reproductive quality of female bees during immature instar stages. This led me to David Tarpy's lab at North Carolina State University, where I'm currently working.

Tarpy's lab focuses on understanding the proximate and ultimate mechanisms of honey bee queen behavior and reproduction, in order to integrate a general understanding of bee biology to help improve overall colony health and productivity. My job there is to study the many morphological and physiological characteristics of honey bee queen quality, specifically investigating potential means of boosting queen quality through hormonal and nutritional augmentation during ontogenic development.

How would you explain the main findings of your paper to non-scientific family and friends?

The queen is the only individual within a colony of honey bees who is fully able to lay eggs. Her function in the colony ranges from egg production to the maintenance of colony order, which is reflected in the overall condition of her colony and, consequently, the productivity of the thousands of worker bees that make up a honey bee colony. By productivity, it's not only the honey and others bee products, but also the pollination activity that improves yields for thousands of crops. In this scenario my role is to find the best ways to improve the queen quality in order to improve the colony as a whole. This has led me to study biological features, such as morphology, physiology and genetics, which could potentially contribute to managing and improving the quality of the colony system.

“[…] external morphological traits cannot be fully translated into bee quality.”

What are the potential implications of these results for your field of research?

In this work we found that external morphological traits cannot be fully translated into bee quality. It's an interesting result since most of features we analyzed are commonly used as a bee quality reference. Moreover, our physiological and gene expression data suggest that protein, lipid and glucose metabolisms are regulated independently during the honey bee larval stage. That is helpful information for further investigations, especially in an ascending field such as the developmental biology applied to honey bee queen quality for beekeeping.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Honey bees (Apis mellifera).

What has surprised you the most while conducting your research?

It's general knowledge that the food quantity and quality drive the caste determination in honey bee females. However, when I did this work raising honey bees in an in vitro environment, I realized to my surprise that this conceptual dogma is not as pervasive as I thought. After doing some replication in which all larvae were raised in exactly the same food environment, I continued to have adults emerge presenting a degree of phenotypes from queens to workers. This shows us how the caste determination could be widely variable and how not just quality and quantity of food are involved in this adult phenotype determination.

What, in your opinion, are some of the greatest achievements in your field and how has this influenced your research?

The growth of epigenetic knowledge is greatly contributing to resolving some old issues and also clarifying how the social environment works by mediating changes in gene expression levels.

What changes do you think could improve the professional lives of early-career scientists?

Opportunity, and in some countries it should be considered as a real job. In some countries, such as Brazil, scientific research is not a career, which hugely reduces the opportunities to do science in these environments.

What's next for you?

Now that we know more about the intricate feeding dynamics that orchestrate reproductive traits of honey bee females, the next steps are to further investigate how it could be managed in way to improve the honey bee queen quality in practice. I've been working on ovary ontogenic development, and some physiology pathways involved in that in order to check the effects on further reproductive quality features that affect the colony as a whole.

Footnotes

  • Daiana Almeida De Souza's contact details: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613, USA.

    E-mail: daianasouz{at}usp.br

  • © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. De Souza, D. A.,
    2. Kaftanoglu, O.,
    3. De Jong, D.,
    4. Page, R. E.,
    5. Amdam, G. V. and
    6. Wang, Y.
    (2018). Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ. Biol. Open 7, bio036616. doi:10.1242/bio.036616
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Biology Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
First person – Daiana Almeida De Souza
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Biology Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Biology Open web site.
Share
First Person
First person – Daiana Almeida De Souza
Biology Open 2018 7: bio039313 doi: 10.1242/bio.039313 Published 22 November 2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
First Person
First person – Daiana Almeida De Souza
Biology Open 2018 7: bio039313 doi: 10.1242/bio.039313 Published 22 November 2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article Navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ANSTRACT
    • Footnotes
    • Reference
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • First person – Ling Wang
  • First person – Antonio Barral and Isabel Rollan
  • First person – Kim Anh Nguyen
Show more FIRST PERSON

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advertisement

First person interviews — Kim, Isabel and Antonio

Kim, Isabel and Antonio

In the latest interviews with early-career authors of our papers, Antonio Barral, Isabel Rollan and Kim Nguyen discuss their scientific backgrounds, research and future directions.


Review Commons launches

We're excited to be an affiliate journal for Review Commons, the ASAPbio/EMBO platform for high-quality journal-independent peer-review in the life sciences, which went live on 09 December.


Cover article — Molecular profiling of stem cell-like female germ line cells in Drosophila delineates networks important for stemness and differentiation

On the cover of issue 11, Tawari, Wodarz et al. identify CG4038 as a gene downregulated in bam mutant ovaries in an RNA-seq transcriptome analysis.


Dates for 2020 — Grants, Meetings and Workshops

Get ahead and update your 2020 diary with our meeting grant deadlines! The Company of Biologists also has a fantastic line-up of Workshops with funded places for early-career researchers and larger Journal Meetings from our sister journals Development, Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Experimental Biology and Disease, Models & Mechanisms.


Why publish with BiO?

Biology Open aims to provide rapid publication for scientifically sound observations and valid conclusions in developmental, cell, experimental and translational biology. Submit your paper for an easy and fast publication process. Recent highlights in BiO by Maldonado, Morillo-Velarde et al. discuss Octopus insularis as a new marine model for evolutionary developmental biology.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About BiO
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer option

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact BiO
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2019   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992