Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Biology Open
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Biology Open

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
METHODS & TECHNIQUES
Model-based serial blood sampling protocol for minimal mortality and better recovery in small to medium sized tilapia
Chris Sihoka, Ina Wagenaar
Biology Open 2018 7: bio037978 doi: 10.1242/bio.037978 Published 27 November 2018
Chris Sihoka
Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chris Sihoka
Ina Wagenaar
Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ina Wagenaar
  • For correspondence: inaw@uj.ac.za
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Serial blood sampling involving sampling blood from the same individual at different time points is essential in time-based studies including xenobiotic toxicokinetics and biochemical studies. However, high fish mortality due to phlebotomy-induced anaemia (PIA) constrains serial blood sampling in small to medium sized fish. The aim of the study was to develop and implement a model-based serial blood sampling protocol that minimises fish mortality by regulating anaemia within levels that sustain fish survival and recovery. A model simulating the reduction in haemoglobin was developed from blood sampling data of sixteen (N=16) medium sized Oreochromis mossambicus. The model was incorporated into a serial blood sampling protocol whose performance was tested on eight (N=8) fish. The protocol avoided fish mortality and the fish recovered from PIA within three weeks of the post-sampling period. Therefore, managing anaemia minimises mortality and improves the applicability of serial blood sampling in small to medium sized fish.

This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper..

INTRODUCTION

Fish are increasingly being used as model animals in scientific studies as they are metabolically similar to higher vertebrates in many aspects. The Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) has several attributes which have increased its usage as a biological model. It has a rapid rate of reproduction, is euryhaline and tolerates a wider range of temperatures in the tropical and warm temperate climates (Davis et al., 2009). Blood sampling forms an important component of many studies. Serial blood sampling in which the same individual is sampled at different time points is useful in time-based studies. Time-based studies have been used to study xenobiotic toxicokinetics to understand the disposition and metabolism of a xenobiotic in the fish's body (Carbonell and Tarazona, 1994; Newby et al., 2006; Feng and Jia, 2009; Lim et al., 2010). They have also been used in biochemical studies to study fish nutrient utilization and blood acid-base state in response to stressors such as hypercapnia and hypoxia (Toews et al., 1983; Deng et al., 2000; Zang et al., 2013; Cadiz et al., 2017).

In small to medium sized fish (30–100 g tilapia) serial blood sampling is challenging to execute as smaller fish have less amounts of blood (estimated 3.9% of body weight) (Okimoto et al., 1994). Therefore, the repeated blood withdrawal often disposes the fish to severe anaemia. Anaemia reduces the supply of oxygen to the tissues leading to poor fish health (Witeska, 2015). Hence most fish fail to recover, and death often results (Department of Fisheries and Oceans, 2004). Consequently, parallel blood sampling where a different individual is sampled at each sampling time point has often been used as a substitute to serial blood sampling (Feng and Jia, 2009; Yang et al., 2014; Teles et al., 2016). Being a composite sampling technique, parallel blood sampling overlooks individual variations and therefore cannot be used in mixed effect modelling, which accurately represents toxicological processes (Tang et al., 2008; Kurawattimath et al., 2012; Sahota et al., 2015). Therefore, its application in toxicological risk assessment is limited. There is a growing advocacy for limiting the number of animals used in a scientific research (Festing and Wilkinson, 2007; Kilkenny et al., 2009). On the contrary, parallel blood sampling increases the animal sample size since a different set of individuals are sampled at each time point. This causes animal wastage on objectives that can be achieved with few animals using serial blood sampling.

Studies involving serial blood sampling are often restricted to larger fish as they have a higher blood volume and conventional blood sampling methods such as cannulation can easily be applied (Yang et al., 2014; Teles et al., 2016). A technique developed for sampling zebrafish (AB strain) with a 2.3% mortality is a rare study involving serial blood sampling in small fish (Zang et al., 2013, 2015). This study focused on the technical aspects of applying a minimally invasive blood sampling technique on zebrafish. To our knowledge, no study has attempted to model and incorporate the relationship between experimental variables (weight, sampled volume and sampling time) and a physiological parameter (blood haemoglobin concentration) responsible for fish mortality into a sampling technique. This approach offers some control on the physiological response of the fish in relation to sampling and hence can minimise mortality.

Studies have shown that repeated blood withdrawal causes a decrease in blood haemoglobin concentration in fish (Ogilvy et al., 1988; Zang et al., 2013, 2015). Haemoglobin concentration is a physiological indicator of anaemia (Witeska, 2015). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and implement a model-based serial blood sampling protocol that minimises mortality of smaller fish by regulating anaemia within levels that sustain fish survival and recovery. The use of anaesthetics to sedate fish has been shown to alter haematological parameters (Smith et al., 1979; Tort et al., 2002; Trushenski et al., 2012; Gressler et al., 2014). This can confound the results in a toxicological study. Therefore, to avoid confounding errors in the model, a non-anaesthetic blood sampling technique was used.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Model development and validation

Table 1 shows the outcome models for the mixed effect regression analysis. The model diagnostic plots for each of the tabulated models are shown in Fig. 2. Only models which accounted for interaction among variables had unbiased (homoscedastic) plots (Fig. 2A,B). All their variables [cumulative volume (Vc), time (t), cummulative volume to mass ratio (Vc/m)] were significant (P<0.01) determinants of Hbp (Table 1). Conversely, models which did not account for interaction among variables produced biased plots (Fig. 2C,D) with insignificant (P>0.05) variable influence on Hbp except for t (Table 1). Therefore, the plots showed that only models 2 and 4 were valid.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Linear mixed effect models and estimated parameters

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Blood sampling and preparation for haemoglobin measurement procedure. (A) The needle was inserted below the scales at 4–13 mm from anal fin. (B) The needle was positioned at approximately 45° ventral to caudal region and blood drawn from caudal vein. (C) A soft tissue was held over the pricked tissue for few seconds to halt the bleeding following needle withdrawal. (D) A drop of sampled blood was drawn into a Hemo Control Microcuvette in preparation for Hb measurement with a Hemo Control Hb Analyzer.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Diagnostic plots for outcome models of linear mixed effect regression. (A) Model 2 had a homoscedastic distribution. (B) Model 4 had a homoscedastic distribution. (C) Model 1 had a heteroscedastic distribution. (D) Model 3 had a heteroscedastic distribution.

According to the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), a model with a lower BIC value predicts a relationship better than one with a higher value (Schwarz, 1978). Model 4 had the lowest BIC value indicating that it was the best fit Model and hence was selected. This Model showed that Vc to m ratio (Vc/m) and t were significant (P<0.01) determinants of Hbp. The incorporation of an interaction factor among the variables in this Model improved its performance as evidenced by a further lowering of the BIC value below that of Model 3 which did not account for interaction (Table 1). This observation strongly suggests that the parameters (Hb, Vc, m, t) influence Hbp in association rather than independently. It follows that how low Hb dropped with sampling was not only dependent on the amount of blood sampled, but also on the interval of sampling and the fish's mass.

The selected Model shows that t and Vc to m ratio correlated inversely with Hbp. This trend is consistent with what was observed in a related study on zebrafish (Zang et al., 2013). However, this study found a further association between Vc to m ratio and t which correlated positively with Hbp. The Vc to m ratio had the largest negative coefficient. This indicates that Vc to m ratio had the largest effect in reducing Hb concentration compared to other variables in the Model. Based on the Model, increasing the amount of blood sampled raises Vc, hence increasing the Vc to m ratio leading to a lowering of Hb. Conversely, an increase in fish weight (m) lowers the ratio and stabilizes Hb. This phenomenon is physiologically plausible in that blood withdrawal reduces red blood cells ultimately leading to lowering of Hb (Witeska, 2015), while a larger fish is expected to have a higher total blood volume (Okimoto et al., 1994). Therefore, in a sampling exercise, optimal blood amounts ought to be drawn in relation to fish weight.

The Model accounted for approximately 0.81 g dl−1 residual (variation) arising from random effects which also affect Hb trend with sampling (Table 1). In this case, the most anticipated random effect is intraspecies physiological variations. It is important to note that blood withdrawal is met by various physiological responses such as those aimed at regaining optimal blood volume and osmolality. These responses could be uniquely expressed in each fish leading individual variability in Hbp.

Blood withdrawal in teleost species has been found to cause haemodilution due to an influx of extravascular fluid in a quest to retain optimal blood volume (Carroll et al., 1984; Ogilvy et al., 1988; Takei, 1988). A study has shown that when subjected to repeated blood withdrawal, O. mossambicus restores blood volume partly by drinking environmental water (Leedom et al., 2003). The haemodilution can cause a drop in Hb. The drop in Hb as represented by the Model was consistent with these physiological responses.

Fish mortality and recovery

Table 2 shows the odds for survival for each model variable and the mortality rate in each experiment. Haemoglobin had very high odds for survival compared to the other variables. Its odds were approximately sixfold higher than Vc to m ratio and eightfold higher than t. This shows that the chances of the fish surviving during sampling largely depended on the level of Hb. This notion was further complemented by a significantly lower Hbp (P<0.05) in the fish that failed to recover (died) compared to those that survived (Fig. 3A).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Survival odds for model variables and fish mortality in experiments 1 and 2

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Post-sampling haemoglobin level in the fish that died and those that survived. (A) A boxplot showed a generally lower Hbp in fish that died, 1.4 (1.3–1.4), compared to the fish that survived, 2.1 (1.6–2.3), Med (IQR) (N=8). (B) Kruskal–Wallis test shows that weekly Hbp in surviving fish (N=8) increased with time and full Hb recovery was attained at 21 days as no significant difference (P=0.89) existed between the Hbi and Hbp at day 21.

In the fish that died, the Hbp dropped below 1.4 g/dl and this was significantly different from the fish that survived where Hbp values were mostly above 1.4 g/dl. This trend suggests that fish recovery was immensely compromised at concentrations below 1.4 g/dl. It further affirms that fish recovery largely depended on how low the Hb level dropped. The Model-based sampling avoided fish mortality by yielding Hbp concentrations that where mostly above 1.4 g/dl. We propose 1.4 g/dl as a critical threshold below which O. mossambicus Hb should not be allowed to drop if recovery chances are to be enhanced.

There was 50% fish mortality in the first experiment, while no mortality occurred in the Model test experiment. The mortality occurred in the first two weeks of the post-sampling period. This observation complements the findings in a related study on zebrafish where 40% mortality was recorded during a week of repeated blood sampling (Zang et al., 2013). However, mortality occurred days after sampling in our study. There was no significant variation between the Hbi and Hbp (P<0.05) by the third week (Fig. 3B). All the surviving fish had regained their normal Hb level. However, the recovery period in our study was longer than the one week found in zebrafish by Zang et al. (2013). Recovery is expected to be different in various fish species as it depends on various antianemia compensatory mechanisms which vary among species and are largely influenced by fish nutritional condition and environmental factors such as temperature and dissolved oxygen (Witeska, 2013, 2015). Lower temperature has been found to slow erythropoiesis and recovery from anaemia in Cyprinus carpio (Rothmann et al., 2000). Although fish may be alive a few days after sampling, our results showed that the impact of the risk imposed by the sampling on fish survival may extend for about two weeks. Therefore, we propose that fish being used for repeated blood sampling experiments should be allowed a recovery period of at least a month before being used in another blood sampling experiment.

Model testing

Fig. 4 compares the predicted and observed Hb concentration. There was a good fit between the predicted and observed Hb as indicated by a higher coefficient of determination (R2=0.8217; adjusted R2=0.8168). This indicates that approximately 82% of the variation in Hb during sampling was accounted for by the Model. Therefore, the Model can form a reliable tool for managing Hb to tolerable limits in experimental design.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Goodness of fit plot between model predicted and observed Hb. There was approximately 82% (R2=0.8217, adjusted R2=0.8168) fit between the predicted and observed Hb.

Conclusions

Severe anaemia exemplified by a drop in Hb is among the primary causes of post sampling mortality in serially blood sampled, small to medium sized fish. A model which simulated the drop in Hb in relation to sampling experimental variables (Vc, m and t) was developed and implemented in a serial blood sampling protocol. By regulating the Hb drop to tolerable levels the protocol minimised fish mortality. This protocol allows for less experimental animals to be used, accounts for individual variations (more accurate models) and assures recovery of sampled fish. Therefore, unnecessary killing of fish can be avoided.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental animals

Adult O. mossambicus (Peters, 1852) aged 8 months, with a mean body mass of 55.4±17.8 g and a mean standard length of 135.9±14.8 mm (mean±s.d.) were purchased from Hartbeespoort Fisheries in Johannesburg, Gauteng province, South Africa. The fish were acclimated in the University of Johannesburg Research Aquarium in an 1000 l holding tank connected to a flow-through system containing borehole water for 30 days.

Experimental design

After the 30 day acclimation period, 24 fish (N=12 males, N=12 females) were transferred from the 1000 l holding tank to an environmental room maintained at 26±1°C with a 12 h photoperiod. The fish were divided into two groups of 16 fish (N=16) and 8 fish (N=8), with an equal number of males and females in each group. Each fish was housed in an 100 l glass tank in a flow-through system supplied with borehole water to further acclimate for 7 days (OECD, 1992; Van Dyk, et al., 2007). Fish were fed on tilapia pellets (FFTI320, Avi-products, Durban, South Africa) twice a day at about 07:30 am and 04:30 pm. Each fish was fed approximately 1% of its body weight per day. The 16 fish (N=16) were used for the first experiment (model development) which involved developing and validating a blood sampling model. The other fish group (N=8) was used for the second experiment (model testing) which involved testing the applicability of the developed model. This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Johannesburg Faculty of Science Ethics Committee (Ref. 2016-02-001).

Model development

Blood sampling

An 8 inch handheld scoop net was used to pick up the fish from the water. To minimise stress caused by prolonged handling, fish were never held out of the water for a period exceeding 1 min and weighing was carried out 24 h prior to blood sampling using an electronic balance (BEB 61, BOECO, Germany). The fish were serially sampled for blood at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h time points. Blood was drawn from the caudal vein using a 0.45 mm×16 mm hypodermal needle fitted to a 2 ml graduated syringe. The needle was inserted below the scales at approximately 45° to the body axis ventral to the tail (Fig. 1A,B). The region 4 mm to 13 mm from the anal fin was used to insert the needle. A different spot was used to insert the needle at each successive sampling interval. After withdrawing the needle, a soft tissue (Wypall X50, Kimberly Clark, Bedfordview, South Africa) was held over the pricked spot for few seconds to stop the bleeding (Fig. 1C).

Volume and haemoglobin measurement

At each sampling time point, the volume of sampled blood was read from the graduated syringe after withdrawing the needle by holding the syringe in a vertical position. Approximately 1% body mass (0.5–1 ml) of blood was sampled at each time point. A drop of blood (approximately 50 µl) was drawn into a Hemo Control Microcuvette (REF 3000-3012-0765, EKF-diagnostic GmbH, Barleben, Germany) (Fig. 1D) to measure the blood haemoglobin concentration using a Hemo Control Analyzer (Model 3000-0031-6801, EKF diagnostic, Barleben, Germany). The sampled blood was transferred to a heparin vacutainer. The blood volume (V) sampled at each time interval (t) (0, 24, 48 and 72 h intervals) and haemoglobin (Hb) concentration were recorded. The post-sampling haemoglobin (Hbp) was measured 24 h after the last sampling interval by drawing a minimal volume of blood not exceeding the base of the needle hub (approximately 100 µl) (Fig. 1D).

Monitoring recovery

The sampled fish were maintained in their individual tanks and monitored for recovery for 3 weeks. Any fish mortalities were recorded and the percentage mortality at the end of each week was calculated as follows: Embedded Image (1)The blood Hb concentration of each fish was monitored at the end of each week. To monitor Hb, a minimal volume of blood (approximately 100 µl) was drawn as previously described.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out in R environment (R statistical software version 3.3.2) at 95% confidence level. All continuous variables (m, V, Hb) were checked for normality using visual examination with Q-Q plots and the Shapiro–Wilk test.

Modelling and model validation

Linear mixed effect regression was used to model the relationship between Hbp concentration and cumulative blood volume (Vc) sampled at each time point, with m and t as fixed effects while fish identity code as a random effect. To develop the best fit model, all variables (m, Vc, t) were first tried as possible independent predictors (assuming no association among variables) of Hbp and then as associated predictors (assuming association among variables). All models developed were examined for validity using goodness of fit plots. The best fit model was selected based on the BIC value generated by the statistical software.

Mortality

Logistic regression was performed to determine which variables among t, Hbp and Vc/m influenced mortality and the results are reported as odds in favour of survival. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the Hbp between the fish that survived and those that died if data were skewed and the results reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Conversely, the unpaired t-test was used to compare the Hbp if the data were normally distributed and results reported as mean and standard deviation (s.d.).

Recovery

To evaluate recovery, weekly Hbp were compared to the initial Hb prior to sampling (Hbi). The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed if data were nonparametric while the one-way ANOVA was used if data were parametric. The results are reported as median and IQR or mean and s.d., respectively.

To examine the goodness of fit between the predicted and measured Hb in the test experiment, linear regression was used to plot the predicted Hb against the measured Hb. The coefficient of determination (R2) is reported.

Model testing

A minimal blood volume (approximately 2 drops) was drawn from each fish. The drawn blood was used to measure the Hbi concentration of the fish as previously explained (see the volume and haemoglobin measurement section). The fish were then acclimated for 7 days. Using the measured Hbi, the selected Model was used to simulate two different sampling schedules lasting 24 h. In simulation, the Vc was adjusted to allow the predicted Hbp not to fall below a critical value (median Hbp of fish that died in the first experiment) and the V sampled over 24 h to be ≤1 ml. In the first sampling schedule, 0.2 ml was respectively sampled from four fish (blood sampling group 1) at 0, 2, 3, 8, and 24 h time points. In the second sampling schedule 0.6 ml was respectively sampled from the other four fish (blood sampling group 2) at 0, and 24 h time points. The sampled fish were monitored for recovery for 3 weeks. Fish mortality and Hb concentration were monitored as previously explained (see the monitoring recovery section of the Materials and Methods).

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff at the University of Johannesburg Research Aquarium for their technical support. We also wish to thank Mr Mwila Mulubwa for the advice in statistical modelling.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    Conceptualization: I.W.; Methodology: C.S.; Validation: C.S.; Investigation: C.S.; Resources: I.W.; Writing - original draft: C.S.; Writing - review & editing: I.W.; Supervision: I.W.; Project administration: I.W.; Funding acquisition: I.W.

  • Funding

    This work was funded by the National Research Foundation of South Africa [grant no. 111564] and the University of Johannesburg Global Excellence and Stature student scholarship to C.S.

  • Data availability

    Raw data underlying the study is available and can be seen upon request to the corresponding author.

  • Received August 21, 2018.
  • Accepted September 19, 2018.
  • © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Cadiz, L.,
    2. Servili, A.,
    3. Quazuguel, P.,
    4. Madec, L.,
    5. Zambonino-Infante, J.-L. and
    6. Mazurais, D.
    (2017). Early exposure to chronic hypoxia induces short- and long-term regulation of hemoglobin gene expression in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). J. Exp. Biol. 220, 3119-3126. doi:10.1242/jeb.160713
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Carbonell, G. and
    2. Tarazona, J. V.
    (1994). Toxicokinetics of copper in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat. Toxicol. 29, 213-221. doi:10.1016/0166-445X(94)90069-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Carroll, R. G.,
    2. Opdyke, D. F. and
    3. Keller, N. E.
    (1984). Vascular recovery following hemorrhage in the dogfish shark Squalus acanthias. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 246, R825-R828. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.1984.246.5.R825
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Davis, L. K.,
    2. Fox, B. K.,
    3. Lim, C.,
    4. Hiramatsu, N.,
    5. Sullivan, C. V.,
    6. Hirano, T. and
    7. Grau, E. G.
    (2009). Induction of vitellogenin production in male tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) by commercial fish diets. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 154, 249-254. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.06.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Deng, D. F.,
    2. Refstie, S.,
    3. Hemre, G.-I.,
    4. Crocker, C. E.,
    5. Chen, H. Y.,
    6. Cech, J. J., Jr.. and
    7. Hung, S. S. O.
    (2000). A new technique of feeding, repeated sampling of blood and continuous collection of urine in white sturgeon. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 22, 191-197. doi:10.1023/A:1007803307617
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    Department of Fisheries and Oceans. (2004). Blood sampling of finfish.Ottawa: Canadian Council of Animal Care. Available from: https://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Education/DFO/4_Blood_Sampling_of_Finfish.pdf.
  7. ↵
    1. Feng, J. and
    2. Jia, X.
    (2009). Single dose pharmacokinetic study of flofenicol in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus×O. aureus) held in freshwater at 22°C. Aquaculture 289, 129-133. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.12.023
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Festing, S. and
    2. Wilkinson, R.
    (2007). The ethics of animal research. Talking point on the use of animals in scientific research. EMBO Rep. 8, 526-530. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400993
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Gressler, L. T.,
    2. Riffel, A. P. K.,
    3. Parodi, T. V.,
    4. Saccol, E. M. H.,
    5. Koakoski, G.,
    6. Da Costa, S. T.,
    7. Pavanato, M. A.
    8. Heinzmann, B. M.,
    9. Caron, B.,
    10. Schmidt, D. et al.
    (2014). Silver catfish Rhamdia quelen immersion anaesthesia with essential oil of Aloysia triphylla (L'hérit) britton or tricaine methanesulfonate: effect on stress response and antioxidant status. Aquacult. Res. 45, 1061-1072. doi:10.1111/are.12043
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Kilkenny, C.,
    2. Parsons, N.,
    3. Kadyszewski, E.,
    4. Festing, M. F. W.,
    5. Cuthill, I. C.,
    6. Fry, D.,
    7. Hutton, J. and
    8. Altman, D. G.
    (2009). Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS ONE 4, e7824. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007824
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kurawattimath, V.,
    2. Pocha, K.,
    3. Mariappan, T. T.,
    4. Trivedi, R. K. and
    5. Mandlekar, S.
    (2012). A modified serial blood sampling technique and utility of dried-blood spot technique in estimation of blood concentration: application in mouse pharmacokinetics. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 37, 23-30. doi:10.1007/s13318-011-0066-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Leedom, T. A.,
    2. Hirano, T. and
    3. Grau, E. G.
    (2003). Effect of blood withdrawal and angiotensin II on prolactin release in the tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 135, 155-163. doi:10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00046-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Lim, J.-H.,
    2. Kim, M.-S.,
    3. Hwang, Y.-H.,
    4. Song, I.-B.,
    5. Park, B.-K. and
    6. Yun, H.-I.
    (2010). Plasma and tissue depletion of florfenicol in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) after oral administration. Aquaculture 307, 71-74. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.07.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Newby, N. C.,
    2. Mendonça, P. C.,
    3. Gamperl, K. and
    4. Stevens, E. D.
    (2006). Pharmacokinetics of morphine in fish: Winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) and seawater-acclimated rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 143, 275-283. doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2006.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Ogilvy, C. S.,
    2. Tremml, P. G. and
    3. Dubois, A. B.
    (1988). Pressor and hemodilution responses compensate for acute hemorrhage in bluefish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 91, 807-813. doi:10.1016/0300-9629(88)90968-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Okimoto, D. K.,
    2. DiStefano, J. J.,
    3. Kuwaye, T. T.,
    4. Ron, B.,
    5. Weber, G. M.,
    6. Nguyen, T. T. and
    7. Grau, E. G.
    (1994). On plasma volume measurement and the effect of experimental stress in the male tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus, maintained in fresh water. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 12, 431-438. doi:10.1007/BF00004307
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1992). OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (203): Fish, Acute Toxicity Test. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  18. ↵
    1. Rothmann, C.,
    2. Levinshal, T.,
    3. Timan, B.,
    4. Avtalion, R. R. and
    5. Malik, Z.
    (2000). Spectral imaging of red blood cells in experimental anemia of Cyprinus carpio. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 125, 75-83. doi:10.1016/S1095-6433(99)00157-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Sahota, T.,
    2. Danhof, M. and
    3. Della Pasqua, O.
    (2015). The impact of composite AUC estimates on the prediction of systemic exposure in toxicology experiments. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 42, 251-261. doi:10.1007/s10928-015-9413-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Schwarz, G.
    (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6, 461-464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Smith, G. L.,
    2. Hattingh, J. and
    3. Burger, A. P.
    (1979). Haematological assessment of the effects of the anaesthetic MS 222 in natural and neutralized form in three freshwater fish species: interspecies differences. J. Fish Biol. 15, 633-643. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1979.tb03672.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Takei, Y.
    (1988). Changes in blood volume after alteration of hydromineral balance in conscious eels, Anguilla japonica. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. 91, 293-297. doi:10.1016/0300-9629(88)90419-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Tang, J.,
    2. Olson, J.,
    3. Xiao, Y.,
    4. Kazavchinskaya, P.,
    5. Stringham, K.,
    6. Kennedy, K. and
    7. Wu, C.
    (2008). Comparison of serial and parallel blood sampling techniques in mouse pharmacokinetics study. Drug Metab. Rev. 40, 161-161.
  24. ↵
    1. Teles, J. A.,
    2. Castello Branco, L. C.,
    3. Del Bianchi, M.,
    4. Pilarski, F. and
    5. Reyes, F. G. R.
    (2016). Pharmacokinetic study of enrofloxacin in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) after a single oral administration in medicated feed. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 39, 205-208. doi:10.1111/jvp.12257
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Toews, D. P.,
    2. Holetonj, G. F. and
    3. Heisler, N.
    (1983). Regulation of the acid-base status during environmental hypercapnia in the marine teleost fish Conger conger. J. Exp. Biol. 107, 9-20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Tort, L.,
    2. Puigcerver, M.,
    3. Crespo, S. and
    4. Padrós, F.
    (2002). Cortisol and haematological response in sea bream and trout subjected to the anaesthetics clove oil and 2-phenoxyethanol. Aquacult. Res. 33, 907-910. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2109.2002.00741.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Trushenski, J. T.,
    2. Bowker, J. D.,
    3. Gause, B. R. and
    4. Mulligan, B. L.
    (2012). Chemical and electrical approaches to sedation of hybrid striped bass: Induction, recovery, and physiological responses to sedation. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 141, 455-467. doi:10.1080/00028487.2012.664603
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Van Dyk, J. C.,
    2. Pieterse, G. M. and
    3. Van Vuren, J. H. J.
    (2007). Histological changes in the liver of Oreochromis mossambicus (Cichlidae) after exposure to cadmium and zinc. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 66, 432-440. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.10.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Witeska, M.
    (2013). Erythrocytes in teleost fishes: a review. Zool. Ecol. 23, 275-281. doi:10.1080/21658005.2013.846963
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Witeska, M.
    (2015). Anemia in teleost fishes. Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol. 35, 149-160.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Yang, F.,
    2. Li, Z. L.,
    3. Shan, Q. and
    4. Zeng, Z. L.
    (2014). Pharmacokinetics of doxycycline in tilapia (Oreochromis aureus×Oreochromis niloticus) after intravenous and oral administration. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 37, 388-393. doi:10.1111/jvp.12095
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Zang, L.,
    2. Shimada, Y.,
    3. Nishimura, Y.,
    4. Tanaka, T. and
    5. Nishimura, N.
    (2013). A novel, reliable method for repeated blood collection from aquarium fish. Zebrafish 10, 425-432. doi:10.1089/zeb.2012.0862
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Zang, L.,
    2. Shimada, Y.,
    3. Nishimura, Y.,
    4. Tanaka, T. and
    5. Nishimura, N.
    (2015). Repeated blood collection for blood tests in adult zebrafish. JoVE 102, e53272. doi:10.3791/53272
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Serial blood sampling
  • Model-based
  • Fish

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Biology Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Model-based serial blood sampling protocol for minimal mortality and better recovery in small to medium sized tilapia
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Biology Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Biology Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
METHODS & TECHNIQUES
Model-based serial blood sampling protocol for minimal mortality and better recovery in small to medium sized tilapia
Chris Sihoka, Ina Wagenaar
Biology Open 2018 7: bio037978 doi: 10.1242/bio.037978 Published 27 November 2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
METHODS & TECHNIQUES
Model-based serial blood sampling protocol for minimal mortality and better recovery in small to medium sized tilapia
Chris Sihoka, Ina Wagenaar
Biology Open 2018 7: bio037978 doi: 10.1242/bio.037978 Published 27 November 2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article Navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Fiji plugin for annotating movies with custom arrows
  • Assessing methods to quantitatively validate TGFβ-dependent autophagy
  • Efficient and crucial quality control of HAP1 cell ploidy status
Show more METHODS & TECHNIQUES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advertisement

Biology Open and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020’s challenges, we achieved a lot at The Company of Biologists. In the midst of the pandemic, we have seen long-term projects and new ventures come to fruition. Read our full lowdown of 2020.


Interview- Sebastian Markert

Sebastian Markert is first author of a paper in BiO using C. elegans to model amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In an interview, he talks about the potential implications of his work and his future plans.


Three communities to support biologists to everywhere

Online communities have never been more important. If you’re looking for somewhere to meet fellow scientists, take part in topical discussions and find virtual events in your field, take a look at each of our community sites:

  • The Node: the community site for and by developmental biologists
  • preLights: the preprint highlights service run by the biological community
  • FocalPlane: the community site for microscopists and biologists alike

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About BiO
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact BiO
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992