Advertisement
Research Article
Cellular response to bacterial infection in the grasshopper Oxya chinensis
Xiaomin Zhang, Keshi Zhang
Biology Open 2019 8: bio045864 doi: 10.1242/bio.045864 Published 22 October 2019

ABSTRACT

Oxya chinensis is one of the most widespread grasshopper species found in China and one of the most common pests against rice. In view of the importance of haemocytes in insect immunity in general, and the lack of information on the haemocytes of O. chinensis, we examined the haemocytes of this species in detail. We challenged the cellular response of this grasshopper with the bacteria Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis. Haemocyte morphology was observed using light, scanning electron and transmission electron microscopy, which revealed distinct morphological varieties of haemocytes. Granulocytes and plasmatocytes responded to the bacterial challenge by phagocytosis. Histochemical staining indicated the presence of acid phosphatase in plasmatocytes and granulocytes. We also observed non-phagocytic prohemocytes and vermicytes, but their functions in the circulation are unclear. Insect haemocytes play a crucial role in cellular immunity, and further research is needed for a comprehensive understanding.

INTRODUCTION

Insect haemocytes have drawn scientists' attention since they were first discovered by Swammerdam (1637–1680) (Jones, 1962), and interest in them has grown with knowledge of their crucial role in the insect immunity. Insects respond to pathogenic challenges through an interplay of two mechanisms, humoral and cellular defences (Charles and Killian, 2015; Urbański et al., 2018). Haemocytes mediate cellular defence by carrying out roles such as phagocytosis, nodulation and encapsulation, and also facilitate humoral defence by synthesising and releasing enzymes and other immune factors (Charles and Killian, 2015; Hillyer, 2016; Urbański et al., 2018).

Insect haemocytes comprise distinct populations, which vary in their morphology and function (Strand, 2008). The origin, function, and classification of these haemocytes are debatable and not fully understood (Duressa and Huybrechts, 2016), partly due to lack of a standardised protocol for insect immune investigation. Direct comparison of the insect immune response is difficult due to the variety of challenges used, life stages examined and methodologies practised (Charles and Killian, 2015). The nomenclature of the haemocytes is not normalised across Insecta (Hillyer, 2016), but recent studies have attempted to generalise variations. Several subtypes have been recognised (Castillo et al., 2006; Grigorian and Hartenstein, 2013; Hillyer and Strand, 2014; King and Hillyer, 2013; Ribeiro and Brehélin, 2006). The most often observed include prohemocytes, which are hypothetical, small, spherical haemocyte progenitors with a high nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio. Plasmatocytes are spindle-shaped cells with cytoplasmic projections and an absence of granules in the cytoplasm. They function in phagocytosis and encapsulation. Granulocytes (or granular cells) are spheroid and oval cells, which contain uniformly sized and electron-dense cytoplasmic granules, and act as phagocytes. Oenocytoids are large, uniformly shaped cells with a low nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio and an eccentrically located nucleus. They contain phenoloxidase, and are responsible for haemolymph darkening (melanisation). Finally, spherulocytes, which may be a source of cuticular components, are irregularly shaped cells packed with large inclusions (spherules). Rarer insect haemocytes, which are only occasionally observed, include cystocytes, adipohemocytes, vermicytes and megakaryocytes (Akai and Sato, 1979; Brehélin et al., 1978; Gillespie et al., 2000; Gupta, 1979; Jones, 1977; Ren et al., 2014; Ribeiro and Brehélin, 2006). Cystocytes (or coagulocytes) are oval or fusiform cells usually lysed or degranulated in vitro, which differ from granulocytes under the periodic acid-Schiff reaction. Adipohemocytes are spherical or oval cells, with the presence of reflective fat droplets, non-lipid granules and vacuoles. Vermicytes (podocytes or vermiform cells) are irregularly shaped cells with multiple cytoplasmic extensions and small electron-dense granules. Megakaryocytes are large cells filled by nuclei, with minimal cytoplasm. Knowledge of the functions of these rarer haemocyte types is limited.

Grasshoppers play an essential role in the grassland ecosystem and have a considerable economic impact on agriculture (Duressa et al., 2015; Latchininsky, 2013). O. chinensis is the most widely distributed grasshopper species in China, and one of the major pests of rice, maize, sorghum and wheat (Liu et al., 1999; Zhang and Huang, 2008). Insect haemocytes have been studied extensively in Drosophila melanogaster and selected lepidopteran species (Lavine and Strand, 2002). However, previously published literature on O. chinensis haemocyte morphology is limited to our early study, Wang et al. (2011), in which we employed three stains to compare their efficiency. Here, we aimed to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the haemocytes of the grasshopper O. chinensis, and insights into standardising insect haemocyte examination methods. The cellular response of O. chinensis was elicited by injection with live Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus. These bacteria are frequently used in insect immune studies due to their non-pathogenicity for insects (Arp et al., 2017). Light microscopy was used with multiple stains to examine haemocyte morphological and histochemical characteristics, and the cellular response to bacterial challenge. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy were used to reveal additional details of the haemocytes.

RESULTS

Haemocyte morphology

The haemocytes from O. chinensis varied regarding their shape, size and cytoplasmic contents. They responded to the bacterial challenges by phagocytosis (Fig. 1). The bacteria E. coli, B. subtilis and S. aureus were bound and digested internally by phagocytes. The phagocytes were capable of digesting the engulfed bacteria while attaching new ones. Between 4 and 8 h after injection, most bacteria were attached to the haemocyte membrane, while some were being ingested. After 12 h, most bacteria inside the phagocytes were broken down into fractions. However, binding of bacteria by phagocytes was still observed at the end of the experiment. Thus, complete removal of the injected bacteria by Oxya’s immune system at the given dose requires more than 2 days. The bacteria B. subtilis formed endospores, as shown by their transparent centre, and were digested by the O. chinensis phagocytes. The unstained centre was not seen in E. coli or B. subtilis.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

The phagocytic response of the grasshopper O. chinensis against E. coli, B. subtilis and S. aureus bacteria at 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h post-injection. The phagocytes shown are plasmatocytes (A–C,H–J,L–O) and granulocytes (D–G,K). Arrows point to bacteria. Scale bars: 5 μm.

The phagocytes of O. chinensis contained two morphological varieties, which were distinguished by the presence of cytoplasmic granules. Round, oval and irregularly shaped granulocytes contained small (<1 µm) basophilic granules (purple), and measured 12–34 µm in diameter (Fig. 2). The centrally located nucleus was stained dark red or bluish purple with Wright-Giemsa and measured 7–20 µm in diameter. The cytoplasm of the granulocytes was stained transparent (neutral), pink (eosinophilic) or light blue (basophilic). The density of the granules ranged from sparse to packed, and their distribution was uniform or erratic.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Wright-Giemsa-stained haemocytes of O. chinensis under the light microscope. (A–C) Polymorphic granulocytes with purple cytoplasmic granules, which vary in density. (D) Oval-shaped plasmatocytes. (E,F) Plasmatocytes with extended pseudopodia (arrows). (G) A spheroid prohemocyte with limited cytoplasm. (H) A worm-shaped vermicyte with elongated cytoplasm and a nucleus containing some cytoplasmic granules (arrows). Scale bars: 5 μm.

Under the scanning electron microscope, granulocytes showed a rough surface (Fig. 3). The small lumps on the cell membrane are likely cytoplasmic granules, and we used the presence of these spherical swellings to distinguish granulocytes from the other haemocytes. Under the transmission electron microscope, the electron-dense and electron-lucent granules in granulocytes were round or oval, and without regular structure (Fig. 4). In addition to the granules, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, phagosome-like vacuole and clumps of small bright inclusions were also visible (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Haemocytes of O. chinensis under the scanning electron microscope. (A) An irregularly shaped granulocyte with lumps on the membrane caused the presence of cytoplasmic granules. (B) An irregularly shaped plasmatocyte with a relatively smooth membrane. (C) A spheroid prohemocyte with smooth membrane. (D) A vermicyte with rough membrane and pseudopodia. Scale bars: 7 μm (A,D), 5 μm (B), 4 μm (D) .

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Granulocytes of O. chinensis under the transmission electron microscope. The slides depict sections of granulocytes with visible granules, indicated by arrows. (A,B) Electron-dense (red arrows) and electron-lucent (black arrows) granules in the cytoplasm are shown. (C) Section of a granulocyte with two clusters of small bright inclusions (arrows). (D) Arrows indicate electron-lucent granules. The nucleus (n), mitochondria (mi) and endoplasmic reticulum (er) are found in the cytoplasm. Scale bars: 0.5 μm (A), 0.8 μm (B), 0.6 μm (C), 1 μm (D).

The phagocytes without granules (plasmatocytes), were polymorphic with a round or oval, irregular, spindle-like shape, and measured 10–32 μm in diameter (Fig. 2). Cytoplasmic projections including pseudopodia were seen under the light, scanning electron and transmission electron microscopes (Figs 3 and 5). The nuclei of plasmatocytes were stained blue or purplish-red with Wright-Giemsa and measured 8–18 μm in diameter. Plasmatocyte cytoplasm was uniformly distributed around the nucleus and stained blue, pinkish-red or transparent. Under the scanning electron microscope, the outer surface of plasmatocyte cell membranes was relatively smooth. Under the transmission electron microscope, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, vacuoles and other inclusions were recognised in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5). Exocytosis-like activities were observed (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Plasmatocytes of O. chinensis under the transmission electron microscope. (A) Many elongated pseudopodia (p) extended outward from the plasmatocytes. (B) Arrows indicate exocytosis-like activity. (C,D) Nuclei (n), mitochondria (mi), endoplasmic reticulum (er), Golgi apparatus (go) and vacuole (va) were observed in the cytoplasm. Scale bars: 1 μm (A), 0.25 μm (B), 0.5 μm (C,D).

Two non-phagocytic varieties of haemocytes, prohemocytes and vermicytes, were sporadically observed in this study. These two cell types were morphologically distinct from plasmatocytes and granulocytes. Prohemocytes were much smaller than the other cell types, and displayed a spheroid shape approximately 8–12 µm in diameter (Fig. 2). The large nucleus was dyed purple or violet with Wright-Giemsa, which almost filled the whole cell. Prohemocytes had a smooth cell membrane under the scanning electron microscope with no pseudopodia or other cytoplasmic projections (Fig. 3). Under the transmission electron microscope, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, vacuoles and other electron-dense and electron-lucent particles were observed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

A prohemocyte and vermicytes of O. chinensis under the transmission electron microscope. (A–C) Prohemocytes (A). B and C are enlarged sections of A (red rectangle). Golgi apparatus (go), nuclei (n), mitochondria (mi), endoplasmic reticulum (er) and vacuole (va) are visible in the cytoplasm. (D–F) Vermicytes of O. chinensis under the transmission electron microscope. (D) Two worm-shaped vermicytes with elongated cytoplasm and nuclei. (E) Arrows indicate some of the vermicytes' cytoplasmic inclusions. (F) An enlarged section of E (red rectangle). Nuclei, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, vacuole, and additional prohemocytes (PR) and plasmatocytes (PL) were also observed. Scale bars: 1 μm (A), 0.5 μm (B,C,E,F), 2.5 μm (D).

Vermicytes, or vermin-formed haemocytes, were found to have distinctive worm-shaped cytoplasm and elongated nuclei (Fig. 2). The span of some vermicyte extensions was over 30 μm. Unlike plasmatocytes with elongated pseudopodia, vermicyte nuclei were attenuated and elongated with the cell. Stained dark blue by Wright-Giemsa, these nuclei were 8–25 μm in diameter. Granules were found in the cytoplasm of many vermicytes examined. Pseudopodia were noticed under the scanning electron microscope (Fig. 3D). Under the transmission electron microscope, vermicyte cytoplasm was abundant in the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria and other inclusions (Fig. 6).

Haemocyte histochemistry

Plasmatocytes and granulocytes were found to contain acid phosphatase (ACP), indicated by a purplish-red colouration of the cytoplasm (Fig. 7). ACP-negative plasmatocytes and granulocytes were also observed with cytoplasm that was clear or filled with clear refractive granules. Chloroacetate Esterase (CAE) staining indicated the presence of a positively reacted compound in the haemolymph and outside the haemocytes. No positively reacted lipid droplets were revealed by Oil Red O (ORO) staining inside haemocytes. The ORO-stained cytoplasm of some haemocytes was distinctively darker than others. A few haemocytes showed a positively reacted pinkish-red substance with periodic periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining.

Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

Histochemically stained haemocytes of O. chineneis. (A–C) Purplish-red colouration indicates a positive reaction in haemocytes stained with ACP. (A) Two ACP-positive plasmatocytes, one of which contains an unstained vacuole (arrow). (B) Two weakly ACP-positive plasmatocytes (black arrows) and two granulocytes with one containing an ACP-positive red granule (red arrow). (C) An ACP-positive plasmatocyte and an ACP-negative granulocyte. The two red arrows point to different sized ACP-positive red granules. (D–F) Haemocytes stained with CAE reaction. The haemocytes are CAE-negative, while the background is positively reacted and red in colour. Plasmatocytes are shown in D and E. (F) A naked nucleus with no conspicuous cytoplasm. (G–I) Haemocytes stained with ORO. (G) Two weakly ORO-positive plasmatocytes (red arrows). (H,L) Granulocyte with clear granules, indicating negative ORO and PAS reactions. (I) A weakly ORO-positive plasmatocyte (arrow) and three nuclei with no defined cytoplasm. (J–L) Haemocytes stained in PAS reaction. (J) One of the two plasmatocytes has PAS-positive purplish-red substances (arrow). (K) Two negatively reacted plasmatocytes. Scale bars: 5 μm.

Differential haemocyte count

Plasmatocytes and granulocytes were the most common haemocytes found in this study, and comprised approximately 90% of the total cells counted (Fig. 8). Slightly more granulocytes were found than plasmatocytes in the untreated grasshopper samples. However, in the bacteria-treated samples, significantly more plasmatocytes were found than granulocytes, especially with grasshoppers injected with E. coli and S. aureus. The changes in amounts of plasmatocytes and granulocytes were inconsistent across the three bacteria-treated groups. The number of plasmatocytes and granulocytes were relatively uniform in the E. coli-treated group. The number of plasmatocytes and granulocytes in individuals treated with B. subtilis and S. aureus varied during the 48-h period. The number of plasmatocytes increased, while granulocytes decreased, in individuals treated with S. aureus. In contrast, granulocytes increased, but plasmatocytes decreased, in the S. aureus-treated group.

Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.

Haemocyte counts from the Wright-Giemsa-stained preparations of normal adults (A), and phagocyte proportion of adults injected with (B) Bacillus subtilis, (C) Escherichia coli and (D) Staphylococcus aureus. (A) Prohemocyte (PR), plasmatocyte (PL), granulocyte (GR) and vermicyte (VE). (B-D) The percentages of plasmatocytes and granulocytes with and without attachment or engulfment of injected bacteria are shown on the y-axes.

DISCUSSION

Haemocytes of O. chinensis can be classified functionally as phagocytes and non-phagocytic haemocytes, or morphologically as granulocytes, plasmatocytes, prohemocytes and vermicytes. Phagocytes, or more specifically, granulocytes and plasmatocytes, account for the majority of haemocytes observed in this study. Phagocytosis is the primary defensive strategy utilised by insects against bacterial infection, and as a result, phagocytes account for a substantial proportion of insect haemocytes (Blandin and Levashina, 2007; Hillyer, 2016). The capacity of Oxya’s plasmatocytes and granulocytes for digesting endocytosed materials was indicated by our observations with hydrolase and acid phosphatase. Hydrolase, located in the lysosomes of haemocytes, is responsible for breaking down endogenous and exogenous macromolecules, including the bacterial cell wall (Callewaert and Michiels, 2010; Wu and Yi, 2015). Additionally, insect haemocytes release acid phosphatase into the haemolymph to modify the pathogens' surface molecular structure, thus enhancing the phagocytotic response (Callewaert and Michiels, 2010).

The phagocytes of O. chinensis are morphologically and functionally similar to those of most other insects. High abundance of plasmatocytes and granulocytes has also been observed in other grasshoppers and locusts (Anggraeni et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2016). Conversely, the structured granules of granulocytes previously observed by transmission electron microscopy (Ribeiro and Brehélin, 2006) were not seen in this study. Granulocytes have mostly been reported to be smaller than plasmatocytes, at 5–9 μm (Hillyer and Strand, 2014; Ribeiro and Brehélin, 2006), but we found them to be similarly sized to plasmatocytes in O. chinensis. In Lepidoptera, plasmatocytes are mostly seen in the role of encapsulation rather than phagocytosis (Ribeiro and Brehélin, 2006).

Granulocytes of Locusta migratoria were found to contain lysozyme in their granules (Zachary and Hoffmann, 1984). However, we observed that the granules of granulocytes did not elicit phagocytosis by haemocytes. In O. chinensis, both plasmatocytes and granulocytes participated in phagocytosis of injected bacteria.

Our findings agree with previous observations that not all plasmatocytes or granulocytes are involved in direct phagocytosis (Yu et al., 2016). Some O. chinensis plasmatocytes and granulocytes contained no acid phosphatase and did not respond to bacterial intruders. Granulocytes have been shown to participate in the activation of the encapsulation response, which releases opsonin-like materials in the presence of foreign objects (Browne et al., 2013; Hillyer, 2016). These materials cause the deformation of plasmatocytes to assist formation of capsules consisting of multiple layers around the unwanted large substances (Ribeiro and Brehélin, 2006). Other functions of granulocytes, such as haemolymph clotting, wound healing and melanisation were reported in the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella, the migratory locust L. migratoria and mosquitoes (Akai and Sato, 1979; Dushay, 2009; Hillyer and Strand, 2014).

Vermicytes are distinguished from plasmatocytes and granulocytes based on their morphology, histochemistry, and function. The small inclusions of vermicytes and their non-phagocytic nature have been used to separate them from the other haemocytes (Ribeiro and Brehélin, 2006). Most studies have considered vermicytes as a sub-class or variant form of plasmatocytes, and they are rarely reported in insects (Gupta, 1979; Jones, 1977; Ribeiro and Brehélin, 2006).

None of the O. chinensis haemocytes we observed morphologically corresponded to adipohemocytes, oenocytoids, podocytes or megakaryocytes. Our ORO experiment found no lipid droplets in the haemocytes of O. chinensis, indicating an absence of adipohemocytes. ORO reveals neutral lipids such as triglycerides and cholesterol esters (Tame et al., 2018). Under the transmission electron microscope, the lipid droplets measuring about 1 μm in diameter that have been observed to fill adipohemocytes from the Chinese grasshopper Acrida cinerea (Yu et al., 1977), were not observed in O. chinensis.

In this study, cystocytes or coagulocytes were not considered a distinct haemocyte type in O. chinensis. Our results are in contrast to those of Costin (1975) in separating cystocytes from plasmatocytes and granulocytes histochemically with the periodic acid-Schiff stain. Structured granules or globules were seen by transmission electron microscopy in a study of Locusta migratoria (Brehélin et al., 1978), but we did not see these in O. chinensis. Early studies described cystocytes or coagulocytes as having fewer granules than granulocytes, and interpreted the cytoplasmic remnants as coagulum or coagulated haemolymph (Costin, 1975; Gillespie et al., 2000; Gupta, 1979), while later studies have not mentioned their existence as a separate type. Cystocytes of L. migratoria have been classified as a subpopulation of granulocytes, which contain less red granules and participate in phagocytosis (Yu et al., 2016). The most reported role of cystocytes is the coagulation of insect haemolymph (Gupta, 1979; Zachary and Hoffmann, 1984). However, the coagulation process has been reported to require the cooperation of haemocytes and the plasma (Dushay, 2009). Granulocytes in many species have been suggested to function in coagulation (Grigorian and Hartenstein, 2013; Hillyer and Strand, 2014).

In O. chinensis, we found more plasmatocytes than granulocytes in bacteria-infected samples, which differs from results in O. japonica, in which more granulocytes were found (Anggraeni et al., 2011). However, this discrepancy may be due to differences in the bacterial challenges used by the two studies. We found that replenished or enhanced abundance of plasmatocytes and granulocytes were associated with the cellular response in O. chinensis. This has also been seen in a study of L. migratoria, in which increases in granulocytes and plasmatocytes after inoculation with the fungus Metarhizium acridum were suggested to result from a release of sessile haemocytes into the circulation (Yu et al., 2016). However, mitosis of circulating haemocytes has been suggested as the primary source of haemocyte replenishment during pathogenic infection in both mosquitoes and locusts (Duressa et al., 2015; King and Hillyer, 2013).

Based on our observations in O. chinensis and other reports, the study of the morphology and histochemistry of haemocytes is essential to the understanding of their function. Plasmatocytes and granulocytes are the primary phagocytic cells of O. chinensis based on their abundance, morphology, histochemistry and phagocytic responses. Our histochemical stains indicate that the haemocytes of O. chinensis are capable of digesting foreign materials, detoxicating haemolymph and regulating metabolism. The importance of non-phagocytic haemocytes found in this study to the cellular response of O. chinensis is questionable due to their low abundance and unknown histochemical properties. Based on our results, we believe light microscopy observation with stained preparations is still convincing in examining the morphology, histology and function of insect haemocytes. The results of this study may contribute to the improvement and standardisation of the staining techniques used in studies of insect haemocytes. Morphological features alone are not sufficient to confirm the classification of insect haemocytes, and combinations of techniques are needed to confirm haemocyte type and function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Species

O. chinensis adult males were collected from Jinyuan District, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China (latitude: 37°42′24.51″; longitude: 112°26′33.05″; altitude: 779.72 m). The collected samples were taken to the laboratory alive, kept in a well-ventilated room and fed with rice. They were maintained for a week before blood sampling and treatment.

Microscopy

Haemolymph was extracted from the prothoracic leg bases of each grasshopper. The ethanol-sterilised leg base skin was pierced and blood was taken with a pipette (MicroPette Plus, Scilogex, Rocky Hill, CT, USA). The blood smears were prepared for light (Olympus BX-51, Tokyo, Japan) and scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi S-570). For light microscopy, smears were prepared conventionally and stained with Wright-Giemsa dye and four histochemical procedures: ACP reaction, PAS reaction, ORO staining and CAE reaction. All dyes were purchased from Baso Diagnostics Inc. (Guangdong, China). After staining, all smears were washed with water, air-dried and mounted with neutral balsam.

For the Wright-Giemsa stain, smears were stained with Wright-Giemsa staining solution for 10–20 min at room temperature. For ACP, smears were fixed in an acetone-methanol buffer for 30 s at 4°C and stained with Acid Phosphatase staining solution for 47 min at room temperature. Washed and air-dried smears were counterstained with Hematoxylin staining solution for 5 min. The positive-reacted particles were purplish red. For PAS, smears were fixed with 95% ethanol for 10 min, and immersed in Periodic Acid solution (10 g/l) for 20 min and Schiff solution for 30 min at room temperature. Smears were then washed with water, air-dried and counterstained with Hematoxylin for 5 min. The presence of red granules or masses in the cytoplasm confirmed a positive reaction. For ORO, smears were fixed with formaldehyde vapour for 10 min and air-dried for 15 min, followed by a 15 min immersion in the Oil Red O dye, then rinsed with 60% isopropyl alcohol and then water. A counterstain with Hematoxylin for 2 min and Disodium Hydrogen Phosphate solution was performed for 1 min. Neutral lipids were stained red, phospholipids were stained pink and nuclei were stained blue. For CAE, the smears were fixed in the Acetone-Methanol buffer for 30 s at 4°C. Washed smears were then stained in the substrate solution for 30 min and counterstained with Hematoxylin staining solution for 10 min at room temperature. Positively reacted cells contained red particles.

For scanning electron microscopy, smears were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde, washed with 0.1 M phosphate (pH 7.4) and post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide. Fixed smears were then dehydrated with ethanol in a graded series (20%, 40%, 60%, 75%, 90%, 95% and 100%) followed by a graded series of tertiary butanol. Dehydrated smears were freeze-dried with an FD-1A-50 freeze dryer (Beijing, China) and coated with gold using an SBC-12 ion sputter coater (Shanghai, China).

For transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1400), extruded blood was fixed in tubes with 5% glutaraldehyde. The tubes were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. Haemocyte pellets were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, and dehydrated in a graded ethanol series followed by acetone, before being embedded in Epon812 resin. Sections were cut with an ultramicrotome (Leica RM2255) and stained with uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate.

Bacterial infection experiment

E. coli, B. subtilis and S. aureus bacteria were purchased from China General Microbiological Culture Collection Centre (Beijing, China). Thirty adult grasshoppers were separated into three groups and injected, respectively, with 10 μl of E. coli, B. subtilis or S. aureus in a (1×105 ml−1) suspension of phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4). Bacteria were injected using a microsyringe between the second and third segments of the abdomen, following ethanol (75%) sterilisation. All grasshoppers were alive at the end of the experiment. Their thoraxes were disinfected with ethanol and pierced with a needle to extract haemolymph at 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after treatment. A gentle squeeze of the thorax was applied to promote bleeding, and a pipette was used to collect blood. Slides were prepared and stained with Wright-Giemsa as described previously.

Haemocyte count and statistical methods

Different haemocyte types were counted on the Wright-Giemsa-stained slides, and their relevant percentages were calculated. Ten untreated grasshoppers were selected, and at least 400 cells were counted from each. The number of phagocytic haemocytes from the bacteria-treated grasshoppers was counted at 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after injection. Statistica 10 data analysis software (StatSoft Inc., 2011) was used to run statistical tests and generate graphs. Data obtained from the differential counts were analysed using ANOVA and Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference test (α=0.05).

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    Conceptualization: X.Z.; Methodology: X.Z., K.Z.; Software: K.Z.; Validation: X.Z.; Formal analysis: X.Z., K.Z.; Investigation: X.Z.; Resources: X.Z.; Data curation: X.Z., K.Z.; Writing - original draft: X.Z., K.Z.; Writing - review & editing: X.Z., K.Z.; Visualization: X.Z.; Supervision: X.Z.; Project administration: X.Z.; Funding acquisition: X.Z.

  • Funding

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 30770239) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province, China (grant number 2009011048).

  • Received June 27, 2019.
  • Accepted September 30, 2019.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Akai, H. and
    2. Sato, S.
    (1979). Surface and internal ultrastructure of hemocytes of some insects. In Insect Hemocytes, Development, Forms, Functions and Techniques (ed. A. P. Gupta), pp. 129-154. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
  2. ↵
    1. Anggraeni, T.,
    2. Melanie, T. and
    3. Putra, R. E.
    (2011). Cellular and humoral immune defenses of Oxya japonica (Orthoptera: Acrididae) to entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae. Entomol. Res. 41, 1-6. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5967.2010.00311.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Arp, A. P.,
    2. Martini, X. and
    3. Pelz-Stelinski, K. S.
    (2017). Innate immune system capabilities of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 148, 94-101. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2017.06.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Blandin, S. A. and
    2. Levashina, E. A.
    (2007). Phagocytosis in mosquito immune responses. Immunol. Rev. 219, 8-16. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00553.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Brehélin, M.,
    2. Zachary, D. and
    3. Hoffmann, J. A.
    (1978). A comparative ultrastructural study of blood cells from nine insect orders. Cell Tissue Res. 195, 45-57. doi:10.1007/BF00233676
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Browne, N.,
    2. Heelan, M. and
    3. Kavanagh, K.
    (2013). An analysis of the structural and functional similarities of insect hemocytes and mammalian phagocytes. Virulence 4, 597-603. doi:10.4161/viru.25906
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Callewaert, L. and
    2. Michiels, C. W.
    (2010). Lysozymes in the animal kingdom. J. Biosci. 35, 127-160. doi:10.1007/s12038-010-0015-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Castillo, J. C.,
    2. Robertson, A. E. and
    3. Strand, M. R.
    (2006). Characterization of hemocytes from the mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 36, 891-903. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.08.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Charles, H. M. and
    2. Killian, K. A.
    (2015). Response of the insect immune system to three different immune challenges. J. Insect Physiol. 81, 97-108. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.07.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Costin, N. M.
    (1975). Histochemical observations of the haemocytes ofLocusta migratoria. Histochem. J. 7, 21-43. doi:10.1007/BF01004830
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Duressa, T. F. and
    2. Huybrechts, R.
    (2016). Development of primary cell cultures using hemocytes and phagocytic tissue cells of Locusta migratoria: an application for locust immunity studies. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 52, 100-106. doi:10.1007/s11626-015-9952-5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Duressa, T. F.,
    2. Vanlaer, R. and
    3. Huybrechts, R.
    (2015). Locust cellular defense against infections: sites of pathogen clearance and hemocyte proliferation. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 48, 244-253. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2014.09.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Dushay, M. S.
    (2009). Insect hemolymph clotting. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66, 2643-2650. doi:10.1007/s00018-009-0036-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Gillespie, J. P.,
    2. Burnett, C. and
    3. Charnley, A. K.
    (2000). The immune response of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria during mycosis of the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae var acridum. J. Insect Physiol. 46, 429-437. doi:10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00128-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Grigorian, M. and
    2. Hartenstein, V.
    (2013). Hematopoiesis and hematopoietic organs in arthropods. Dev. Genes Evol. 223, 103-115. doi:10.1007/s00427-012-0428-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Gupta, A.
    (1979). Hemocyte types: their structures, synonymies, interrelationships, and taxonomic significance. In Insect Hemocytes Development, Forms, Functions, and Techniques (ed. A. P. Gupta), pp. 85-127. USA: Cambridge University Press.
  17. ↵
    1. Hillyer, J. F.
    (2016). Insect immunology and hematopoiesis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 58, 102-118. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2015.12.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Hillyer, J. F. and
    2. Strand, M. R.
    (2014). Mosquito hemocyte-mediated immune responses. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 3, 14-21. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2014.07.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Jones, J. C.
    (1962). Current concepts concerning insect hemocytes. Am. Zool. 2, 209-246. doi:10.1093/icb/2.2.209
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Jones, J. C.
    (1977). The circulatory system of insects. USA: Thomas Springfield.
  21. ↵
    1. King, J. G. and
    2. Hillyer, J. F.
    (2013). Spatial and temporal in vivo analysis of circulating and sessile immune cells in mosquitoes: hemocyte mitosis following infection. BMC Biol. 11, 55. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-11-55
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Latchininsky, A. V.
    (2013). Locusts and remote sensing: a review. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 7, 075099. doi:10.1117/1.JRS.7.075099
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Lavine, M. D. and
    2. Strand, M. R.
    (2002). Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32, 1295-1309. doi:10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00092-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Liu, Z.,
    2. Wu, M.,
    3. Deng, Z.,
    4. Wang, Q.,
    5. Chen, H.,
    6. Zhang, J.-P.,
    7. Launois, M. and
    8. Zheng, Z.
    (1999). Action mode, persistence and control value of Fipronil for rice grasshoppers Oxya (Orthoptera: Cantantopidae). Insect Sci. 6, 62-70. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7917.1999.tb00011.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Ren, C.,
    2. Li, X.,
    3. Wu, Z. and
    4. Zhang, X.
    (2014). Morphology of the hemocytes of Bryodema nigroptera Zheng. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 51, 540-547.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Ribeiro, C. and
    2. Brehélin, M.
    (2006). Insect haemocytes: what type of cell is that? J. Insect Physiol. 52, 417-429. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.01.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    StatSoft Inc. (2011). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), Tulsa, USA: StatSoft, Inc.
  28. ↵
    1. Strand, M. R.
    (2008). The insect cellular immune response. Insect Sci. 15, 1-14. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7917.2008.00183.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Tame, A.,
    2. Ozawa, G.,
    3. Maruyama, T. and
    4. Yoshida, T.
    (2018). Morphological and functional characterization of hemocytes from two deep-sea vesicomyid clams Phreagena okutanii and Abyssogena phaseoliformis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 74, 281-294. doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2017.12.058
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Urbański, A.,
    2. Adamski, Z. and
    3. Rosiński, G.
    (2018). Developmental changes in haemocyte morphology in response to Staphylococcus aureus and latex beads in the beetle Tenebrio molitor L. Micron 104, 8-20. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2017.10.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Wang, Q.,
    2. Cui, Z.,
    3. Wang, Y.,
    4. Sheng, X. and
    5. Zhang, X.
    (2011). Comparison among three staining methods to hemocytes of Oxya chinensis. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 48, 841-844.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Wu, G. and
    2. Yi, Y.
    (2015). Effects of dietary heavy metals on the immune and antioxidant systems of Galleria mellonella larvae. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 167, 131-139. doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2014.10.004
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Yu, C.-H.,
    2. Yang, H.-Y.,
    3. Kim, W.-K. and
    4. Kim, C.-W.
    (1977). An ultrastructural study on larval Hemocytes of Acrida cinerea Thunberg. Appl. Microsc. 7, 13-20.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Yu, Y.,
    2. Cao, Y.,
    3. Xia, Y. and
    4. Liu, F.
    (2016). Wright–Giemsa staining to observe phagocytes in Locusta migratoria infected with Metarhizium acridum. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 139, 19-24. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2016.06.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Zachary, D. and
    2. Hoffmann, D.
    (1984). Lysozyme is stored in the granules of certain haemocyte types in Locusta. J. Insect Physiol. 30, 405-411. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(84)90098-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Zhang, C. and
    2. Huang, Y.
    (2008). Complete mitochondrial genome of Oxya chinensis (Orthoptera, Acridoidea). Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 40, 7-18. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00375.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
Back to top

RSSRSS

Keywords

 Download PDF

Email
Research Article
Cellular response to bacterial infection in the grasshopper Oxya chinensis
Xiaomin Zhang, Keshi Zhang
Biology Open 2019 8: bio045864 doi: 10.1242/bio.045864 Published 22 October 2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article Navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

First person interview – Mary Salcedo

A photo of Mary and a diagram depicting insect wing venation patterns, wing contour and shapes.

Have you seen our interviews with early-career first authors of our papers? In the latest issue, first author Mary Salcedo discusses her latest Methods and Techniques paper in which a newly created method geometrically analyses 789 insect wings.

Highlights from Travelling Fellowship trips

Find out how Pamela Imperadore’s Travelling Fellowship grant from The Company of Biologists took her to Germany, where she used new imaging techniques to investigate the cellular machinery underlying octopus arm regeneration. Don’t miss the next application deadline for 2020 travel, coming up on 29 November. Where will your research take you?

A photo of a mouse snout overlaid with a 3D model in blue and green, derived from computational fluid dynamics simulations of airflow through the nasal passages during respiration.

On the cover, David Coppola, Brent Craven and their colleagues refute a widely-debated theory of olfactory coding first suggested by the Nobel Laureate Lord Adrian over half a century ago.

Biology Open has strong credentials and publishing with us is easy and fast. BiO aims to provide rapid publication for scientifically sound observations and valid conclusions in developmental, cell, experimental and translational biology. Submit your paper here – you’ll be in good company!

Recent cell science highlights in BiO – Masamitsu Sato and colleagues show that the conserved microtubule-associated protein CLASP facilitates bundling of spindle microtubules in early mitosis. 

Transfer to Biology Open

If your submission to one of our sister journals, Development, Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Experimental Biology or Disease Models & Mechanisms, is unsuccessful, you can transfer your paper and any reviews directly to Biology Open. The majority of papers transferred with reviews are accepted for publication - find out more.

BiO joins the Review Commons initiative

Biology Open is pleased to be a part of the new and exciting Review Commons initiative, launched by EMBO and ASAPbio. Streamlining the publishing process, Review Commons enables high-quality peer review to take place before journal submission. Papers submitted to Review Commons will be assessed independently of any journal, focusing solely on the paper’s scientific rigor and merit.

preLights - Mammalian Y RNAs are modified at discrete guanosine residues with N-glycans

preLights logo

Connor Rosen discusses his selected preprint by Carolyn Bertozzi, Ryan Flynn and their co-workers on the glycosylation of small non-coding RNAs in mammalian cells.