Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Biology Open
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Biology Open

Advanced search

RSS   Twitter   Facebook   YouTube

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About BiO
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact BiO
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Compartment and cell-type specific hypoxia responses in the developing Drosophila brain
Martin Baccino-Calace, Daniel Prieto, Rafael Cantera, Boris Egger
Biology Open 2020 9: bio053629 doi: 10.1242/bio.053629 Published 18 August 2020
Martin Baccino-Calace
1Developmental Neurobiology, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin Baccino-Calace
Daniel Prieto
1Developmental Neurobiology, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel Prieto
Rafael Cantera
1Developmental Neurobiology, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
2Zoology Department, Stockholm University, Stockholm 106 91, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Egger
3Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg CH-1700, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Boris Egger
  • For correspondence: boris.egger@unifr.ch
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Tracheoles and undifferentiated cells are spatially segregated within the larval brain. (A) The central brain (left part of the hemisphere shown in this image) contains most tracheoles (shown in A and B with chitin-derived autofluorescence) and synapses (B, stained with anti-Bruchpilot), but the optic lobe (right part of the hemisphere in A and B, see also C) has very few tracheoles and synapses (n=6). The larval optic lobe is enriched in proliferative progenitors and immature cells while most terminally differentiated neurons are found in the central brain (schematically illustrated in C). At the border between the central brain and the optic lobe a boundary can be observed between differentiated neurons and progenitors (C, dashed square). Transmission electron microscopy of a region similar to that squared in C reveals the boundary (arrowheads in D) between central brain differentiated neurons with a low nucleus/cytoplasm ratio (left in D, pseudo-coloured in magenta) and undifferentiated cells in the optic lobe, with much less cytoplasm (right in D, pseudo-coloured in yellow) (n=5). Differentiated neurons are larger and contain more a well-differentiated cytoplasm, enriched in organelles like mitochondria (E, pseudo-coloured in orange), rough endoplasmic reticulum cisternae (pseudo-coloured in light green), Golgi cisternae (pseudo-coloured in cyan) and other organelles. Immature neurons in the optic lobe (F) are less differentiated than central brain neurons and show a thin ring of cytoplasm around the nucleus. CB, central brain; OL, optic lobe; OPC, outer proliferation centre; IPC, inner proliferation centre; Nu, nucleus; Cy, cytoplasm; sNB, secondary neuroblasts; pNr, primary neurons; GMC, ganglion mother cells; sNr, secondary neurons; NE, neuroepithelium; NB, neuroblasts; uNr, undifferentiated neurons. Scale bars: A,B: 50 µm; D: 5 µm; E,F: 500 nm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    The tracheole length grows as the optic lobe volume increases during larval development. Tracheolar trees of the optic lobe were reconstructed in brains stained with Calcofluor and anti-Discs large (not shown) at 12 h intervals from 24 to 96 h ALH. Dashed lines indicate the brain hemisphere and its corresponding optic lobe (identified by morphological landmarks visualised by anti-Discs large staining). Both the optic lobe (A–G) and its tracheoles (A–F,H) grow continuously along larval life. Analysis of the ratio of total tracheolar length in the optic lobe and optic lobe volume showed a decline in the proportion of optic lobe tracheolation (I). Scale bars: 20 µm for panels A–C, 50 µm for panels D–F. *P<0.05, **P<0.001, Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon test. ns., non-significant; ALH, after larval hatching; CB, central brain. Sample sizes for time points from 24 h to 96 h ALH, n=4, 6, 6, 6, 6, 5, 6, respectively.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    The hypoxia response in central brain and optic lobe is differentially regulated throughout larval development. (A,C,E) Ratiometric images of single frontal confocal sections of a brain hemisphere of larvae expressing the green (ubi-GFP-ODD) and red (ubi-mRFP-nls) fluorescent proteins of the biosensor. The colour code (upper right) indicates average GFP-ODD/mRFP-nls ratios for each nucleus, which were segmented based on the mRFP-nls signal. (A′,C′,E′) Maximum intensity projection of the brain tracheal system (white). The dotted line denotes the border between central brain and optic lobe. (B,D,F) Histograms representing the frequency distribution of GFP-ODD/mRFP-nls ratios (normalised to whole-brain average) for the central brain and the optic lobe, showing a clear difference in the distribution of values between the two brain compartments. (B′,D′,F′) Box plots showing the non-normalised mean of the GFP-ODD/mRFP-nls ratios, showing maximum and minimum observation, upper and lower quartile, and median. Scale bars: 15 µm (A,A′), 20 µm (C,C′), 40 µm (E,E′). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon test. Sample size n=6, 6, 8.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    The hypoxia response correlates with the distance between a cell and its closest tracheole. (A) Ratiometric image of a larval hemisphere at 84 h ALH superimposed with a maximum projection of the tracheal system (Calcofluor). (A′) Magnified view of the brain area framed by the yellow square in (A), which points to cells (nuclei) within the optic lobe volume surrounding the optic lobe lateral tracheole (OLTl, white arrow in A). Inset showing a single nucleus (inside dotted circle) for which the corresponding ratio value and distance to tracheole are shown (bottom right). (B) ratio−1 plotted against distance to OLTl tracheole. The black line shows the exponential fit to the data (n=6). (C) ratio−1 plotted against minimum distance to tracheole for every nucleus in the brain (purple: central brain, orange: optic lobe; n=6). The black dotted line is an exponential fit to the data. (D) Exponential fits (grey lines) for values of eight different brains; the black dotted line shows the average fit for these brains. (E) The function resulting of the exponential fit to the data was used to calculate a predicted ratio value for each cell according to the distance from the cell to its closest tracheole. The values are depicted with a colour codescale from predicted high ratios (bright colours) to predicted low ratios (dark colours). Scale bars: 40 µm.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    GFP-ODD degradation is driven by oxygen availability. Ratiometric images for larvae exposed to hyperoxia (A, n=7) and hypoxia (D, n=7) and the corresponding maximum projection of their tracheal system (Calcofluor; A′,D′). Larvae reared in ambient hyperoxia show a left-shift (higher oxygen) in the distribution of optic lobe ratio values (B). Brains of larvae exposed to hyperoxia show lower ratio values both for central brain and optic lobe (B′). (E) Larvae reared in hypoxia showed two distinct populations of values for central brain and optic lobe as observed in normoxia (see Fig. 3E). (E′) Hypoxia-reared larvae showed increased non-normalized mean ratio values (i.e. lower oxygen) as compared to normoxia. (C,F) ratio−1 (oxygenation) plotted against minimum distance to tracheoles. Sky blue lines (C) and orange lines (F) show exponential fits for different brains from larvae reared in hyperoxia and hypoxia, respectively. Dotted lines show average of all fits for normoxia (black), hyperoxia (dark blue) and hypoxia (red). Scale bar is applicable to all panels and is 40 µm. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon test.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    The biosensor reveals cell-type specific hypoxia states in central brain and optic lobe. (A–E) Dorsal views (in relation to the neuraxis) of immunostained brains for cell-type specific markers (gray): (A) anti-Deadpan (neuroblasts, NB), (B) anti-Prospero (ganglion mother cells, GMC), (C) anti-Elav (neurons), (D) anti-Repo (glial cells). The cell-specific nuclear staining shown in (A–D) was utilized as segmentation signal to create a mask to obtain the corresponding ratiometric analysis of each cell type (A′–D′). The anti-Discs large staining (E) was used to outline neuroepithelial cells. The corresponding ratiometric analysis (E′) was based on manual segmentation of the IPC and OPC using TrakEM2. (F) Mean ratio−1 (oxygenation) for each cell type in central brain and optic lobe, represented as a function of mean distance to tracheoles. The dotted line shows the average trend, obtained by averaging the fits of all normoxic brains. (G) Decaying exponential fits for all cell types. (H) Boxplot comparing ratiometric values of all cell types both in central brain and optic lobe (n=4). (I) Exposure to hyperoxia has a stronger effect in neuroblasts than in neuroepithelial cells (n=6). (J) Cell-type specific hypoxia response in the central brain and optic lobe based on biosensor data. Scale bar is applicable to all panels and is 40 µm. Error bars in (F) show s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon test.

  • Table 1.
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Drosophila
  • Brain development
  • Hypoxia
  • Neural stem cell
  • Tracheolation

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Biology Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Compartment and cell-type specific hypoxia responses in the developing Drosophila brain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Biology Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Biology Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Compartment and cell-type specific hypoxia responses in the developing Drosophila brain
Martin Baccino-Calace, Daniel Prieto, Rafael Cantera, Boris Egger
Biology Open 2020 9: bio053629 doi: 10.1242/bio.053629 Published 18 August 2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Compartment and cell-type specific hypoxia responses in the developing Drosophila brain
Martin Baccino-Calace, Daniel Prieto, Rafael Cantera, Boris Egger
Biology Open 2020 9: bio053629 doi: 10.1242/bio.053629 Published 18 August 2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article Navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Smoking flies: Testing the effect of tobacco cigarettes on heart function of Drosophila melanogaster
  • Bisphenol A promotes stress granule assembly and modulates the integrated stress response
  • Variation in alarm calls during different breeding stages of the common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus)
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Advertisement

Biology Open and COVID-19

We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.

Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.


2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite 2020’s challenges, we achieved a lot at The Company of Biologists. In the midst of the pandemic, we have seen long-term projects and new ventures come to fruition. Read our full lowdown of 2020.


Interview- Sebastian Markert

Sebastian Markert is first author of a paper in BiO using C. elegans to model amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In an interview, he talks about the potential implications of his work and his future plans.


Three communities to support biologists to everywhere

Online communities have never been more important. If you’re looking for somewhere to meet fellow scientists, take part in topical discussions and find virtual events in your field, take a look at each of our community sites:

  • The Node: the community site for and by developmental biologists
  • preLights: the preprint highlights service run by the biological community
  • FocalPlane: the community site for microscopists and biologists alike

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About BiO
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact BiO
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992